Development of a text mining algorithm for identifying adverse drug reactions in electronic health records

被引:3
作者
van de Burgt, Britt W. M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wasylewicz, Arthur T. M. [2 ]
Dullemond, Bjorn [4 ]
Jessurun, Naomi T. [5 ]
Grouls, Rene J. E.
Bouwman, R. Arthur [3 ,6 ]
Korsten, Erik H. M. [2 ,3 ]
Egberts, Toine C. G. [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Catharina Hosp, Div Clin Pharm, NL-5623 EJ Eindhoven, Netherlands
[2] Catharina Hosp, Div Healthcare Intelligence, NL-5623 EJ Eindhoven, Netherlands
[3] Tech Univ Eindhoven, Dept Elect Engn, Signal Proc Grp, NL-5612 AP Eindhoven, Netherlands
[4] Tech Univ Eindhoven, Dept Math & Comp Sci, NL-5612 AP Eindhoven, Netherlands
[5] Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Ctr LAREB, NL-5237 MH Shertogenbosch, Netherlands
[6] Catharina Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, NL-5623 EJ Eindhoven, Netherlands
[7] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Clin Pharm, NL-3584 CX Utrecht, Netherlands
[8] Univ Utrecht, Fac Sci, Utrecht Inst Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Pharmacoepidemiol & Clin Pharmacol, NL-3584 CX Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
adverse drug reaction; text mining; free-text; natural language processing; clinical decision support systems; electronic health record; EXTRACTION; INFORMATION; MEDICATION; EVENTS; HOSPITALIZATION; DOCUMENTATION;
D O I
10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae070
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are a significant healthcare concern. They are often documented as free text in electronic health records (EHRs), making them challenging to use in clinical decision support systems (CDSS). The study aimed to develop a text mining algorithm to identify ADRs in free text of Dutch EHRs.Materials and Methods In Phase I, our previously developed CDSS algorithm was recoded and improved upon with the same relatively large dataset of 35 000 notes (Step A), using R to identify possible ADRs with Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) terms and the related Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms (SNOMED-CT) (Step B). In Phase II, 6 existing text-mining R-scripts were used to detect and present unique ADRs, and positive predictive value (PPV) and sensitivity were observed.Results In Phase IA, the recoded algorithm performed better than the previously developed CDSS algorithm, resulting in a PPV of 13% and a sensitivity of 93%. For The sensitivity for serious ADRs was 95%. The algorithm identified 58 additional possible ADRs. In Phase IB, the algorithm achieved a PPV of 10%, a sensitivity of 86%, and an F-measure of 0.18. In Phase II, four R-scripts enhanced the sensitivity and PPV of the algorithm, resulting in a PPV of 70%, a sensitivity of 73%, an F-measure of 0.71, and a 63% sensitivity for serious ADRs.Discussion and Conclusion The recoded Dutch algorithm effectively identifies ADRs from free-text Dutch EHRs using R-scripts and MedDRA/SNOMED-CT. The study details its limitations, highlighting the algorithm's potential and significant improvements. The study addressed the challenge of identifying adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in the free-text notes of Dutch electronic health records (EHRs). ADRs are crucial to monitor because they can harm patients and increase healthcare costs. However, they are often documented in an unstructured manner, making it difficult for clinical decision support systems (CDSS) to detect them effectively. To address this, a text mining (TM) algorithm was developed using R programming to identify possible ADRs from these free-text notes. In the first phase, we improved and recoded the existing CDSS algorithm into the TM algorithm and tested it on a large dataset of 35 000 EHR notes. This new algorithm showed better performance in identifying ADRs compared to the old one, with a sensitivity of 86% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 10%. In the second phase, additional text-mining scripts were used, which significantly improved the algorithm's accuracy. The final results showed a PPV of 70% and a sensitivity of 73%, indicating a substantial improvement in the algorithm's ability to detect ADRs. The study concludes that the new algorithm is effective in identifying ADRs from Dutch EHRs, highlighting its potential to enhance patient safety.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Methods for causality assessment of adverse drug reactions - A systematic review [J].
Agbabiaka, Taofikat B. ;
Savovic, Jelena ;
Ernst, Edzard .
DRUG SAFETY, 2008, 31 (01) :21-37
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, IHI Global Trigger Tool for Measuring Adverse Events, V2nd
[3]   Extraction of Adverse Drug Effects from Clinical Records [J].
Aramaki, Eiji ;
Miura, Yasuhide ;
Tonoike, Masatsugu ;
Ohkuma, Tomoko ;
Masuichi, Hiroshi ;
Waki, Kayo ;
Ohe, Kazuhiko .
MEDINFO 2010, PTS I AND II, 2010, 160 :739-743
[4]   Improving drug safety with adverse event detection using natural language processing [J].
Botsis, Taxiarchis ;
Kreimeyer, Kory .
EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY, 2023, 22 (08) :659-668
[5]  
Breden A, 2020, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:2005.06634
[6]   A simple algorithm for identifying negated findings and diseases in discharge summaries [J].
Chapman, WW ;
Bridewell, W ;
Hanbury, P ;
Cooper, GF ;
Buchanan, BG .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2001, 34 (05) :301-310
[7]   From narrative descriptions to MedDRA: automagically encoding adverse drug reactions [J].
Combi, Carlo ;
Zorzi, Margherita ;
Pozzani, Gabriele ;
Moretti, Ugo ;
Arzenton, Elena .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2018, 84 :184-199
[8]  
De Langhe L., 2024, Comput Linguist Nether J, V13, P63
[9]   Machine learning models to detect and predict patient safety events using electronic health records: A systematic review [J].
Deimazar, Ghasem ;
Sheikhtaheri, Abbas .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2023, 180
[10]   Integrating existing natural language processing tools for medication extraction from discharge summaries [J].
Doan, Son ;
Bastarache, Lisa ;
Klimkowski, Sergio ;
Denny, Joshua C. ;
Xu, Hua .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2010, 17 (05) :528-531