Precision HER2: a comprehensive AI system for accurate and consistent evaluation of HER2 expression in invasive breast Cancer

被引:1
|
作者
Xiong, Zhongtang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Liu, Kai [4 ]
Liu, Shaoyan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Feng, Jiahao [4 ]
Wang, Jin [4 ]
Feng, Zewen [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lai, Boan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Qingxin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Jiang, Qingping [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Wei [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Guangzhou Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 3, Dept Pathol, 63 Duobao Rd, Guangzhou 510150, Peoples R China
[2] Guangzhou Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 3, Guangdong Prov Key Lab Major Obstet Dis, 63 Duobao Rd, Guangzhou 510150, Peoples R China
[3] Guangzhou Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 3, Guangdong Prov Clin Res Ctr Obstet & Gynecol, 63 Duobao Rd, Guangzhou 510150, Peoples R China
[4] Cells Vis Guangzhou Med Technol Inc, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
HER2; Breast cancer; Artificial intelligence; DCIS; ADCs; ANTIBODY-DRUG CONJUGATE; TRASTUZUMAB; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; STATISTICS; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-024-12980-6
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundWith the development of novel anti-HER2 targeted drugs, such as ADCs, it has become increasingly important to accurately interpret HER2 expression in breast cancer. Previous studies have demonstrated high intra-observer and inter-observer variabilities in evaluating HER2 staining by human eyes. There exists a strong requirement to develop artificial intelligence (AI) systems to achieve high-precision HER2 expression scoring for better clinical therapy.MethodsIn the present study, we collected breast cancer tissue samples and stained consecutive sections with anti-Calponin and anti-HER2 antibodies. High-quality digital images were selected from immunohistochemical slides and interpreted as HER2 3+, 2+, 1+, and 0. AI models were trained and assessed using annotated training and testing sets. The AI model was trained to automatically identify ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) by Calponin staining and myoepithelial annotation and filter out DCIS components in HER2-stained slides using image-overlapping techniques. Furthermore, we organized two-phase validation studies. In phase one, pathologists interpreted 112 HER2 whole-slide images (WSIs) without AI assistance, whereas in phase two, pathologists read the same slides using the AI system after a washing period of 2 weeks.ResultsOur AI model greatly improved the accuracy of reading (0.902 vs. 0.710). The number of HER2 1 + patients misdiagnosed as HER2 0 was significantly reduced (32/279 vs. 65/279), and they benefitted from ADC drugs. In addition, the AI algorithm improved the intra-group consistency of HER2 readings by pathologists with different years of experience (intra-class correlation coefficient [ICC]: 0.872-0.926 vs. 0.818-0.908), with the improvement most pronounced among junior pathologists (0.885 vs. 0.818).ConclusionsWe proposed a high-precision AI system to identify and filter out DCIS components and automatically evaluate HER2 expression in invasive breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Tissue Microarray Is a Reliable Tool for the Evaluation of HER2 Amplification in Breast Cancer
    Furrer, Daniela
    Jacob, Simon
    Caron, Chantal
    Sanschagrin, Francois
    Provencher, Louise
    Diorio, Caroline
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 36 (09) : 4661 - 4666
  • [32] SLC35A2 expression is associated with HER2 expression in breast cancer
    Wang, Yiran
    Peng, Xiaobo
    Wu, Meihong
    Wang, Bin
    Chen, Tianran
    Zhan, Xianbao
    DISCOVER ONCOLOGY, 2024, 15 (01)
  • [33] HER2 Testing in Gastric Cancer
    Albarello, Luca
    Pecciarini, Lorenza
    Doglioni, Claudio
    ADVANCES IN ANATOMIC PATHOLOGY, 2011, 18 (01) : 53 - 59
  • [34] Comparison of Central HER2 Testing With Quantitative Total HER2 Expression and HER2 Homodimer Measurements Using a Novel Proximity-Based Assay
    Huang, Weidong
    Reinholz, Monica
    Weidler, Jodi
    Lie, Yolanda
    Paquet, Agnes
    Whitcomb, Jeannette
    Lingle, Wilma
    Jenkins, Robert B.
    Chen, Beiyun
    Larson, Jeffrey S.
    Tan, Yuping
    Sherwood, Thomas
    Bates, Michael
    Perez, Edith A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2010, 134 (02) : 303 - 311
  • [35] In situ detection of HER2:HER2 and HER2:HER3 protein–protein interactions demonstrates prognostic significance in early breast cancer
    Melanie Spears
    Karen J. Taylor
    Alison F. Munro
    Carrie A. Cunningham
    Elizabeth A. Mallon
    Chris J. Twelves
    David A. Cameron
    Jeremy Thomas
    John M. S. Bartlett
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2012, 132 : 463 - 470
  • [36] HER2 and lung cancer
    Landi, Lorenza
    Cappuzzo, Federico
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2013, 13 (10) : 1219 - 1228
  • [37] HER2 FISH classification of equivocal HER2 IHC breast cancers with use of the 2013 ASCO/CAP practice guideline
    Fan, Yao-Shan
    Casas, Carmen E.
    Peng, Jinghong
    Watkins, Melanie
    Fan, Lynn
    Chapman, Jennifer
    Ikpatt, Offiong Francis
    Gomez, Carmen
    Zhao, Wei
    Reis, Isildinha M.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2016, 155 (03) : 457 - 462
  • [38] ER and HER2 expression are positively correlated in HER2 non-overexpressing breast cancer
    Isabel Pinhel
    Margaret Hills
    Suzanne Drury
    Janine Salter
    Georges Sumo
    Roger A'Hern
    Judith M Bliss
    Ivana Sestak
    Jack Cuzick
    Peter Barrett-Lee
    Adrian Harris
    Mitch Dowsett
    Breast Cancer Research, 14
  • [39] HER2/neu expression correlates with vasculogenic mimicry in invasive breast carcinoma
    Liu, Tieju
    Sun, Baocun
    Zhao, Xiulan
    Gu, Qiang
    Dong, Xueyi
    Yao, Zhi
    Zhao, Nan
    Chi, Jiadong
    Liu, Ning
    Sun, Ran
    Ma, Yuemei
    JOURNAL OF CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR MEDICINE, 2013, 17 (01) : 116 - 122
  • [40] Impact of the 2018 ASCO/CAP HER2 guidelines update for HER2 testing by FISH in breast cancer
    Xu, Bin
    Shen, Jianguo
    Guo, Wenhao
    Zhao, Wenhe
    Zhuang, Yiyu
    Wang, Linbo
    PATHOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2019, 215 (02) : 251 - 255