Precision HER2: a comprehensive AI system for accurate and consistent evaluation of HER2 expression in invasive breast Cancer

被引:1
|
作者
Xiong, Zhongtang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Liu, Kai [4 ]
Liu, Shaoyan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Feng, Jiahao [4 ]
Wang, Jin [4 ]
Feng, Zewen [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lai, Boan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Qingxin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Jiang, Qingping [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Wei [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Guangzhou Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 3, Dept Pathol, 63 Duobao Rd, Guangzhou 510150, Peoples R China
[2] Guangzhou Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 3, Guangdong Prov Key Lab Major Obstet Dis, 63 Duobao Rd, Guangzhou 510150, Peoples R China
[3] Guangzhou Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 3, Guangdong Prov Clin Res Ctr Obstet & Gynecol, 63 Duobao Rd, Guangzhou 510150, Peoples R China
[4] Cells Vis Guangzhou Med Technol Inc, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
HER2; Breast cancer; Artificial intelligence; DCIS; ADCs; ANTIBODY-DRUG CONJUGATE; TRASTUZUMAB; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; STATISTICS; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-024-12980-6
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundWith the development of novel anti-HER2 targeted drugs, such as ADCs, it has become increasingly important to accurately interpret HER2 expression in breast cancer. Previous studies have demonstrated high intra-observer and inter-observer variabilities in evaluating HER2 staining by human eyes. There exists a strong requirement to develop artificial intelligence (AI) systems to achieve high-precision HER2 expression scoring for better clinical therapy.MethodsIn the present study, we collected breast cancer tissue samples and stained consecutive sections with anti-Calponin and anti-HER2 antibodies. High-quality digital images were selected from immunohistochemical slides and interpreted as HER2 3+, 2+, 1+, and 0. AI models were trained and assessed using annotated training and testing sets. The AI model was trained to automatically identify ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) by Calponin staining and myoepithelial annotation and filter out DCIS components in HER2-stained slides using image-overlapping techniques. Furthermore, we organized two-phase validation studies. In phase one, pathologists interpreted 112 HER2 whole-slide images (WSIs) without AI assistance, whereas in phase two, pathologists read the same slides using the AI system after a washing period of 2 weeks.ResultsOur AI model greatly improved the accuracy of reading (0.902 vs. 0.710). The number of HER2 1 + patients misdiagnosed as HER2 0 was significantly reduced (32/279 vs. 65/279), and they benefitted from ADC drugs. In addition, the AI algorithm improved the intra-group consistency of HER2 readings by pathologists with different years of experience (intra-class correlation coefficient [ICC]: 0.872-0.926 vs. 0.818-0.908), with the improvement most pronounced among junior pathologists (0.885 vs. 0.818).ConclusionsWe proposed a high-precision AI system to identify and filter out DCIS components and automatically evaluate HER2 expression in invasive breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Targeting HER2 heterogeneity in breast cancer
    Hamilton, Erika
    Shastry, Mythili
    Shiller, S. Michelle
    Ren, Rongqin
    CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 2021, 100
  • [22] Her2 positive breast cancer: practices
    Campone, Mario
    Berton-Rigaud, Dominique
    Bourbouloux, Emmanuelle
    Sophie, Sadot
    Zanetti, Alain
    Frenel, Jean-Sebastien
    BULLETIN DU CANCER, 2011, 98 (02) : 154 - 163
  • [23] Genetic heterogeneity of HER2 in breast cancer: impact on HER2 testing and its clinicopathologic significance
    Yang, Yi-ling
    Fan, Yu
    Lang, Rong-gang
    Gu, Feng
    Ren, Mei-Jing
    Zhang, Xin-Min
    Yin, Dong
    Fu, Li
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2012, 134 (03) : 1095 - 1102
  • [24] The Effect of Prolonged Fixation on the Immunohistochemical Evaluation of Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor, and HER2 Expression in Invasive Breast Cancer: A Prospective Study
    Tong, Leung Chu
    Nelson, Nahid
    Tsourigiannis, Jim
    Mulligan, Anna Marie
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2011, 35 (04) : 545 - 552
  • [25] HER2 Signaling in Breast Cancer
    Shin, Incheol
    TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH IN BREAST CANCER, 2021, 1187 : 53 - 79
  • [26] Assessment of HER2 status in breast cancer
    Penault-Llorca, F
    Cayre, A
    BULLETIN DU CANCER, 2004, 91 : S211 - S215
  • [27] Diagnostic Value of Automated Her2 Evaluation in Breast Cancer A Study on 272 Equivocal (score 2+) Her2 Immunoreactive Cases Using an FDA Approved System
    Cantaloni, Chiara
    Tonini, Eugenia
    Eccher, Claudio
    Morelli, Luca
    Leonardi, Elena
    Bragantini, Emma
    Aldovini, Daniela
    Fasanella, Silvia
    Ferro, Antonella
    Cazzolli, Daniela
    Berlanda, Gabriella
    Dalla Palma, Paolo
    Barbareschi, Mattia
    APPLIED IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR MORPHOLOGY, 2011, 19 (04) : 306 - 312
  • [28] HER2 breast cancer therapies: a review
    Murphy, Conleth G.
    Modi, Shanu
    BIOLOGICS-TARGETS & THERAPY, 2009, 3 : 289 - 301
  • [29] HER2 equivocal breast cancer that is positive by alternative probe HER2 FISH are classified as HER2 negative by Oncotype DX
    Tozbikian, Gary H.
    Zynger, Debra L.
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2018, 24 (04) : 535 - 540
  • [30] Is HER2 ultra-low breast cancer different from HER2 null or HER2 low breast cancer? A study of 1363 patients
    Chen, Zhaoxu
    Jia, Huiqing
    Zhang, Huina
    Chen, Lifang
    Zhao, Peng
    Zhao, Jing
    Fu, Guangming
    Xing, Xiaoming
    Li, Yujun
    Wang, Chengqin
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2023, 202 (02) : 313 - 323