Quantitative Risk Assessment of an Oil-Gas-Hydrogen-Electricity Integrated Energy Station in China

被引:0
作者
Zhao, Jianbo [1 ]
Wu, Mingkun [1 ]
Lu, Hongpeng [1 ]
Li, Guidong [1 ]
Xu, Yuzhi [1 ]
Tian, Mengkui [1 ]
机构
[1] Guizhou Univ, Coll Chem & Chem Engn, Guiyang 550025, Guizhou, Peoples R China
来源
ACS OMEGA | 2024年 / 9卷 / 37期
关键词
MANAGEMENT; ACCIDENTS;
D O I
10.1021/acsomega.4c05050
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
This paper presents a quantitative risk assessment (QRA) study of an oil-gas-hydrogen-electricity integrated energy station in China. A comprehensive assessment of the station was made in terms of consequences and risks, respectively. Consequence analysis shows that the severity of hazardous chemical leakage accidents in the station is in the order of natural gas, hydrogen, gasoline, and diesel fuel, especially in the liquefied natural gas (LNG) and compressed natural gas (CNG) storage tank areas, which may cause major accidents in the event of leakage. The results of the risk assessment showed that the individual and societal risks of the integrated oil-gas-hydrogen-electricity energy station exceeded the risk acceptance criteria. Moreover, the catastrophic rupture of LNG and CNG storage tanks is the main cause of the unacceptable risk. Additional mitigation measures for them, mainly including the installation of emergency manual shut-off valves, the installation of combustible gas detection and alarm devices, and pressure relief protection devices, can effectively reduce the risk to an acceptable level.
引用
收藏
页码:38887 / 38896
页数:10
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Using the ALARP principle for safety management in the energy production sector of chemical industry
    Abrahamsen, Eirik Bjorheim
    Abrahamsen, Hakon Bjorheim
    Milazzo, Maria Francesca
    Selvik, Jon Tommeras
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2018, 169 : 160 - 165
  • [2] A literature review on hydrogen refuelling stations and infrastructure. Current status and future prospects
    Apostolou, D.
    Xydis, G.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2019, 113
  • [3] Assael M. J., 2010, FIRES EXPLOSIONSAND
  • [4] Fire risk assessment in fire hazardous zones of gasoline stations
    Chaiklieng, Sunisa
    Dacherngkhao, Thawatchai
    Suggaravetsiri, Pornnapa
    Pruktharathikul, Vichai
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH, 2020, 62 (01)
  • [5] The hazards and risks of hydrogen
    Crowl, Daniel A.
    Jo, Young-Do
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2007, 20 (02) : 158 - 164
  • [6] Ehrhart B. D., 2021, HYDROGEN RISK ASSESS
  • [7] Ehrhart B. D., 2020, HYDROGEN RISK ASSESS
  • [8] Hydrogen refueling station: Overview of the technological status and research enhancement
    Genovese, M.
    Fragiacomo, P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE, 2023, 61
  • [9] HyRAM: A methodology and toolkit for quantitative risk assessment of hydrogen systems
    Groth, Katrina M.
    Hecht, Ethan S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2017, 42 (11) : 7485 - 7493
  • [10] Quantitative risk assessment of an urban hydrogen refueling station
    Gye, Hye-Ri
    Seo, Seung-Kwon
    Bach, Quang-Vu
    Ha, Daeguen
    Lee, Chul-Jin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2019, 44 (02) : 1288 - 1298