Learning When to Treat Business Processes: Prescriptive Process Monitoring with Causal Inference and Reinforcement Learning

被引:7
作者
Bozorgi, Zahra Dasht [1 ]
Dumas, Marlon [2 ]
La Rosa, Marcello [1 ]
Polyvyanyy, Artem [1 ]
Shoush, Mahmoud [2 ]
Teinemaa, Irene [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
[2] Univ Tartu, Narva Mnt 18, EE-51009 Tartu, Estonia
[3] DeepMind, London, England
来源
ADVANCED INFORMATION SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, CAISE 2023 | 2023年 / 13901卷
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会; 欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
prescriptive process monitoring; causal inference; reinforcement learning;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-031-34560-9_22
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Increasing the success rate of a process, i.e. the percentage of cases that end in a positive outcome, is a recurrent process improvement goal. At runtime, there are often certain actions (a.k.a. treatments) that workers may execute to lift the probability that a case ends in a positive outcome. For example, in a loan origination process, a possible treatment is to issue multiple loan offers to increase the probability that the customer takes a loan. Each treatment has a cost. Thus, when defining policies for prescribing treatments to cases, managers need to consider the net gain of the treatments. Also, the effect of a treatment varies over time: treating a case earlier may be more effective than later in a case. This paper presents a prescriptive monitoring method that automates this decision-making task. The method combines causal inference and reinforcement learning to learn treatment policies that maximize the net gain. The method leverages a conformal prediction technique to speed up the convergence of the reinforcement learning mechanism by separating cases that are likely to end up in a positive or negative outcome, from uncertain cases. An evaluation on two real-life datasets shows that the proposed method outperforms a state-of-the-art baseline.
引用
收藏
页码:364 / 380
页数:17
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Recursive partitioning for heterogeneous causal effects
    Athey, Susan
    Imbens, Guido
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2016, 113 (27) : 7353 - 7360
  • [2] Batoulis K., 2014, 1 INT WORKSH MOD INT
  • [3] Prescriptive process monitoring based on causal effect estimation
    Bozorgi, Zahra Dasht
    Teinemaa, Irene
    Dumas, Marlon
    La Rosa, Marcello
    Polyvyanyy, Artem
    [J]. INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2023, 116
  • [4] Prescriptive Process Monitoring for Cost-Aware Cycle Time Reduction
    Bozorgi, Zahra Dasht
    Teinemaa, Irene
    Dumas, Marlon
    La Rosa, Marcello
    Polyvyanyy, Artem
    [J]. 2021 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PROCESS MINING (ICPM 2021), 2021, : 96 - 103
  • [5] Process Mining Meets Causal Machine Learning: Discovering Causal Rules from Event Logs
    Bozorgi, Zahra Dasht
    Teinemaa, Irene
    Dumas, Marlon
    La Rosa, Marcello
    Polyvyanyy, Artem
    [J]. 2020 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PROCESS MINING (ICPM 2020), 2020, : 129 - 136
  • [6] Design and Evaluation of a Process-aware Recommender System based on Prescriptive Analytics
    de Leoni, Massimiliano
    Dees, Marcus
    Reulink, Laurens
    [J]. 2020 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PROCESS MINING (ICPM 2020), 2020, : 9 - 16
  • [7] Dorogush A. V., 2018, WORKSH ML SYST NIPS, DOI DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.1810.11363
  • [8] Fire now, fire later: alarm-based systems for prescriptive process monitoring
    Fahrenkrog-Petersen, Stephan A.
    Tax, Niek
    Teinemaa, Irene
    Dumas, Marlon
    de Leoni, Massimiliano
    Maggi, Fabrizio Maria
    Weidlich, Matthias
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2022, 64 (02) : 559 - 587
  • [9] Koorn J.J., 2022, Mining statistical relations for better decision making in healthcare processes
  • [10] Looking for Meaning: Discovering Action-Response-Effect Patterns in Business Processes
    Koorn, Jelmer J.
    Lu, Xixi
    Leopold, Henrik
    Reijers, Hajo A.
    [J]. BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT (BPM 2020), 2020, 12168 : 167 - 183