Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Mohan, Gautham Varun Krishna [1 ]
Babar, Nawabzada Nadir [2 ,3 ]
Sompalli, Sindhuja [4 ]
Mian, Muhammad Umar [5 ]
Israr, Farhan [6 ,7 ]
Chaudhari, Sandipkumar S. [8 ,9 ]
Wei, Calvin R. [10 ]
Allahwala, Danish [11 ]
机构
[1] Tirunelveli Med Coll, Internal Med, Tirunelveli, India
[2] Combined Mil Hosp CMH, Lahore Med Coll, Internal Med, Lahore, Pakistan
[3] Inst Dent, Lahore, Pakistan
[4] JSS Med Coll, Internal Med, Hyderabad, India
[5] Allama Iqbal Med Coll, Internal Med, Lahore, Pakistan
[6] Khyber Med Coll, Med, Peshawar, Pakistan
[7] Lady Reading Hosp, Internal Med, Peshawar, Pakistan
[8] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Cardiothorac Surg, Birmingham, AL USA
[9] Univ North Dakota, Family Med, Sch Med & Hlth Sci, Fargo, ND USA
[10] Shing Huei Grp, Res & Dev, Taipei, Taiwan
[11] Fatima Mem Hosp, Nephrol, Karachi, Pakistan
关键词
angiography-guided pci; intravascular imaging-guided pci; intravascular imaging-guided; cardiovascular; outcomes; systematic review and meta analysis; angiography-guided; percutaneous coronary intervention; STENT IMPLANTATION; OUTCOMES; TRIAL; IVUS;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.69167
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
This meta-analysis evaluated the clinical outcomes of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). A comprehensive literature search was conducted across major electronic databases, identifying relevant studies published up to August 15, 2024. Thirteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) met the inclusion criteria, comparing IVUS-guided and angiography-guided PCI. The primary outcomes were major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and stent thrombosis, while secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, myocardial infarction, and revascularization rates. Pooled analysis revealed that IVUS-guided PCI significantly reduced the risk of MACE (risk ratio (RR): 0.63, 95% CI: 0.50-0.79) and stent thrombosis (RR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.30-0.90) compared to angiography-guided PCI. Secondary outcomes also favored IVUS guidance, with significant reductions in cardiac mortality, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization (TLR), and target vessel revascularization (TVR). While a trend towards reduced allcause mortality was observed with IVUS guidance, it did not reach statistical significance. Notably, low heterogeneity across studies strengthened the reliability of these findings. Meta-regression analysis indicated that the presence of myocardial infarction did not significantly moderate the effect of IVUS on clinical outcomes, suggesting consistent benefits across patient subgroups. These results highlight the potential of IVUS-guided PCI to improve cardiovascular outcomes and reduce the need for repeat procedures. The findings support the growing body of evidence favoring IVUS use in PCI, particularly in complex lesions and high-risk patients. However, considerations such as cost-effectiveness and the need for specialized training remain important factors in the widespread adoption of IVUS-guided PCI in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention
    Cerit, Levent
    MINERVA CARDIOANGIOLOGICA, 2017, 65 (02): : 193 - 193
  • [32] The long-term clinical outcomes of intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided coronary drug eluting stent implantation in long de novo coronary lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Shen
    Liang, Changzai
    Wang, Yue
    Sun, Shuaifeng
    Wang, Yue
    Suo, Min
    Ye, Maomao
    Li, Xinjian
    Liu, Xinyan
    Zhang, Meng
    Wu, Xiaofan
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [33] Comparison of intravascular ultrasound, optical coherence tomography, and conventional angiography-guided percutaneous coronary interventions: A systematic review, network meta-analysis, and meta-regression
    Park, Dae Yong
    An, Seokyung
    Jolly, Neeraj
    Attanasio, Steve
    Yadav, Neha
    Gutierrez, Jorge A.
    Nanna, Michael G.
    Rao, Sunil V. V.
    Vij, Aviral
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2023, 102 (03) : 440 - 450
  • [34] Optical coherence tomography-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Ahmed, Mushood
    Javaid, Hira
    Maniya, Muhammad Talha
    Shafiq, Aimen
    Shahbaz, Haania
    Singh, Priyansha
    Jain, Hritvik
    Basit, Jawad
    Hamza, Mohammad
    Nashwan, Abdulqadir J.
    Ali, Shafaqat
    Vadamalai, Karthik
    IJC HEART & VASCULATURE, 2024, 52
  • [35] Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Endovascular Therapy for Femoropopliteal Artery Disease: A Scoping Review
    Meng, Wenzhuo
    Guo, Julong
    Pan, Dikang
    Guo, Lianrui
    Gu, Yongquan
    JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2023,
  • [36] Intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes (IVUS-ACS): a two-stage, multicentre, randomised trial
    Li, Xiaobo
    Ge, Zhen
    Kan, Jing
    Anjum, Muhammed
    Xie, Ping
    Chen, Xiang
    Khan, Hamid Sharif
    Guo, Xiaomei
    Saghir, Tahir
    Chen, Jing
    Gill, Badar Ul Ahad
    Guo, Ning
    Sheiban, Imad
    Raza, Afsar
    Wei, Yongyue
    Chen, Feng
    Mintz, Gary S.
    Zhang, Jun-Jie
    Stone, Gregg W.
    Chen, Shao-Liang
    LANCET, 2024, 403 (10439): : 1855 - 1865
  • [37] COMPARISON OF FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE VS INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND-GUIDED PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION FOR INTERMEDIATE LESIONS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Waqar, Hafiza Hareem
    Hamza, Mohammad
    CHEST, 2023, 164 (04) : 316A - 316A
  • [38] Optical coherence tomography-guided vs. intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Vats, Vaibhav
    Elahi, Aarij
    Hidri, Sinda
    Abdelkader, Rem Ehab
    Munaf, Farhan
    Prince, Jennifer Mercika
    Asif, Muhammad Ahsan
    Cheema, Huzaifa Ahmad
    Ahmad, Adeel
    Rehman, Wajeeh Ur
    Nashwan, Abdulqadir J.
    Ahmed, Raheel
    Lakhter, Vladimir
    Virk, Hafeez Ul Hassan
    Vincent, Royce P.
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2024, 11
  • [39] Meta-analysis and systematic review of intravascular ultrasound versus angiography-guided drug eluting stent implantation in left main coronary disease in 4592 patients
    Wang, Yue
    Mintz, Gary S.
    Gu, Zhichun
    Qi, Yue
    Wang, Yue
    Liu, Mengru
    Wu, Xiaofan
    BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, 2018, 18
  • [40] Meta-analysis and systematic review of intravascular ultrasound versus angiography-guided drug eluting stent implantation in left main coronary disease in 4592 patients
    Yue Wang
    Gary S. Mintz
    Zhichun Gu
    Yue Qi
    Yue Wang
    Mengru Liu
    Xiaofan Wu
    BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 18