Performance of Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes decision rules in acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Dizaji, Shayan Roshdi [1 ]
Ahmadzadeh, Koohyar [1 ]
Zarei, Hamed [1 ]
Miri, Reza [2 ]
Yousefifard, Mahmoud [1 ]
机构
[1] Iran Univ Med Sci, Physiol Res Ctr, Hemmat Highway,POB 14665354, Tehran, Iran
[2] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Prevent Cardiovasc Dis Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
关键词
acute coronary syndrome; decision support techniques; diagnosis; ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL RISK SCORES; CHEST-PAIN; SYNDROMES MACS; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; EXTERNAL VALIDATION; AID; DERIVATION; BIOMARKER;
D O I
10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001147
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Multiple decision-aiding models are available to help physicians identify acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and accelerate the decision-making process in emergency departments (EDs). This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of the Manchester Acute Coronary Syndrome (MACS) rule and its derivations, enhancing the evidence for their clinical use. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from inception until October 2023 for studies including adult ED patients with suspected cardiac chest pain and inconclusive findings requiring ACS risk-stratification. The predictive value of MACS, Troponin-only MACS (T-MACS), or History and Electrocardiogram-only MACS (HE-MACS) decision aids for diagnosing acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and 30-day major adverse cardiac outcomes (MACEs) among patients admitted to ED with chest pain suspected of ACS. Overall sensitivity and specificity were synthesized using the 'Diagma' package in STATA statistical software. Applicability and risk of bias assessment were performed using the QUADAS-2 tool. For AMI detection, MACS has a sensitivity of 99% [confidence interval (CI): 97-100], specificity of 19% (CI: 10-32), and AUC of 0.816 (CI: 0.720-0.885). T-MACS shows a sensitivity of 98% (CI: 98-99), specificity of 35% (CI: 29-42), and AUC of 0.859 (CI: 0.824-0.887). HE-MACS exhibits a sensitivity of 99% (CI: 98-100), specificity of 9% (CI: 3-21), and AUC of 0.787 (CI: 0.647-0.882). For MACE detection, MACS demonstrates a sensitivity of 98% (CI: 94-100), specificity of 22% (CI: 10-42), and AUC of 0.804 (CI: 0.659-0.897). T-MACS displays a sensitivity of 96% (CI: 94-98), specificity of 36% (CI: 30-43), and AUC of 0.792 (CI: 0.748-0.830). HE-MACS maintains a sensitivity of 99% (CI: 97-99), specificity of 10% (CI 6-16), and AUC of 0.713 (CI: 0.625-0.787). Of all the MACS models, T-MACS displayed the highest overall accuracy due to its high sensitivity and significantly superior specificity. T-MACS exhibits very good diagnostic performance in predicting both AMI and MACE. This makes it a highly promising tool for managing patients with acute chest pain.
引用
收藏
页码:310 / 323
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Antithrombotic agents for secondary prevention after acute coronary syndromes: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Fanaroff, Alexander C.
    Hasselblad, Vic
    Roe, Matthew T.
    Bhatt, Deepak L.
    James, Stefan K.
    Steg, Ph Gabriel
    Gibson, C. Michael
    Ohman, E. Magnus
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 241 : 87 - 96
  • [22] Danhong Injection in the Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Wu, Jia-Rui
    Zhang, Xiao-Meng
    Zhang, Bing
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CHINESE MEDICINE, 2015, 43 (02): : 199 - 214
  • [23] Effect of Helicobacter pylori infection on the risk of acute coronary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fang, Yizhen
    Fan, Chunming
    Xie, Huabin
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (50)
  • [24] Prevalence of obstructive sleep apnoea in acute coronary syndrome patients: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Le Grande, Michael R.
    Beauchamp, Alison
    Driscoll, Andrea
    Jackson, Alun C.
    BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [25] The efficacy and safety of bivalirudin and heparin in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhai, You
    Shang, Hongcai
    Li, Yan
    Zhang, Nan
    Zhang, Jisi
    Wu, Shangwen
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2025, 14 (01)
  • [26] The Therapeutic Efficacy of Danhong Injection Combined With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zou, Jun-Bo
    Zhang, Xiao-Fei
    Wang, Jing
    Wang, Fang
    Cheng, Jiang-Xue
    Yang, Fang-Yan
    Song, Xiao
    Wang, Yu
    Liang, Yu-Lin
    Shi, Ya-Jun
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2018, 9
  • [27] Antiplatelet Strategy for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
    Ullah, Waqas
    Sandhyavenu, Harigopal
    Taha, Amro
    Gowda, Smitha Narayana
    Mukhtar, Maryam
    Polam, Aravind Reddy
    Zahid, Salman
    Fischman, David L.
    Savage, Michael P.
    Rao, Sunil V.
    Alkhouli, Mohamad
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2024, 13 (20):
  • [28] C-Reactive Protein and Outcomes in Acute Coronary Syndromes: A systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Correia, Luis C. L.
    Pericles Esteves, J.
    ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2011, 97 (01)
  • [29] Antidepressant treatment in patients following acute coronary syndromes: a systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis
    Sweda, Romy
    Siontis, George C. M.
    Nikolakopoulou, Adriani
    Windecker, Stephan
    Pilgrim, Thomas
    ESC HEART FAILURE, 2020, 7 (06): : 3610 - 3620
  • [30] Body mass index and mortality after acute coronary syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lamelas, Pablo M.
    Maheer, Khan
    Schwalm, Jon-David
    ACTA CARDIOLOGICA, 2017, 72 (06) : 655 - 661