Comparative Performance of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and Conventional Imaging in the Primary Staging of High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients Who Are Candidates for Radical Prostatectomy

被引:2
|
作者
Rovera, Guido [1 ]
Grimaldi, Serena [2 ]
Oderda, Marco [3 ]
Marra, Giancarlo [3 ]
Calleris, Giorgio [3 ]
Iorio, Giuseppe Carlo [4 ]
Falco, Marta [4 ]
Passera, Roberto [1 ,2 ]
Grossi, Cristiano [4 ]
Campidonico, Giuseppe [2 ]
Mangia, Maria Luce [2 ]
Deandreis, Desiree [5 ]
Faletti, Riccardo [6 ]
Ricardi, Umberto [4 ]
Gontero, Paolo [3 ]
Morbelli, Silvia [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turin, Dept Med Sci, Nucl Med Div, I-10126 Turin, Italy
[2] Univ Turin, Nucl Med Div, AOU Citta Salute & Sci Torino, I-10126 Turin, Italy
[3] Univ Turin, Dept Surg Sci, Urol Unit, AOU Citta Salute & Sci Torino,Molinette Hosp, I-10126 Turin, Italy
[4] Univ Turin, Dept Oncol, Radiat Oncol, I-10126 Turin, Italy
[5] Gustave Roussy, Nucl Med Div, F-94805 Villejuif, France
[6] Univ Turin, Dept Surg Sci, Radiol Unit, I-10126 Turin, Italy
关键词
prostate cancer; hormone-sensitive prostate cancer; positron emission tomography; PSMA PET; primary staging; conventional imaging; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; TOMOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.3390/diagnostics14171964
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
This prospective study aimed to (1) compare the diagnostic performance of Ga-68-PSMA-11 PET/CT with respect to conventional imaging (computed tomography (CT) and bone scintigraphy (BS)) in the primary staging of high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients and (2) validate PSMA-PET/CT accuracy in pelvic nodal staging in comparison with postoperative histopathology and assess PSMA-PET/CT's impact on patient management. Sixty castration-sensitive high-risk (ISUP 4-5 and/or PSA > 20 ng/mL and/or cT3) PCa patients eligible for radical prostatectomy were enrolled (median PSA 10.10 [IQR: 6.22-17.95] ng/mL). PSMA-PET/CT, compared with CT, identified nodal (N) and/or distant metastases (M1) in 56.7% (34/60) vs. 13.3% (8/60) (p < 0.001) of patients: N + 45% vs. 13.3% (p < 0.001), M1a 11.7% vs. 1.7% (p = 0.03), M1b 23.3% vs. 1.7% (p < 0.001). Compared with BS, PSMA-PET/CT localized unknown skeletal metastases in 15% (9/60) of cases, with no false negative findings. Overall, PSMA-PET/CT led to a TNM upstaging in 45.0% (27/60) of cases, with no evidence of downstaging, resulting in a change in management in up to 28.8% (17/59) of patients. Compared with histopathology data (n = 32 patients), the per-patient accuracy of PSMA-PET/TC for detecting pelvic nodal metastases was 90.6%. Overall, the above evidence supports the use of PSMA-PET/CT in the diagnostic workup of high-risk prostate cancer staging.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The value of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in patients with prostate cancer and inconclusive standard imaging at primary staging
    Nalliah, Surenth
    Zacho, Helle D.
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 43 (10) : 1092 - 1098
  • [2] Initial Experience of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT Imaging in High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Prior to Radical Prostatectomy
    Budaeus, Lars
    Leyh-Bannurah, Sami-Ramzi
    Salomon, Georg
    Michl, Uwe
    Heinzer, Hans
    Huland, Hartwig
    Graefen, Markus
    Steuber, Thomas
    Rosenbaum, Clemens
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (03) : 393 - 396
  • [3] Recurrence rate after radical prostatectomy following primary staging of high-risk prostate cancer with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT
    Klingenberg, Soren
    Fredsoe, Jacob
    Sorensen, Karina D.
    Ulhoi, Benedicte P.
    Borre, Michael
    Jochumsen, Mads R.
    Bouchelouche, Kirsten
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2022, 61 (10) : 1289 - 1294
  • [4] Impact of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET staging on clinical decision-making in patients with intermediate or high-risk prostate cancer
    Ferraro, Daniela A.
    Schueler, Helena I. Garcia
    Muehlematter, Urs J.
    Eberli, Daniel
    Mueller, Julian
    Muller, Alexander
    Gablinger, Roger
    Kranzbuehler, Helmut
    Omlin, Aurelius
    Kaufmann, Philipp A.
    Hermanns, Thomas
    Burger, Irene A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2020, 47 (03) : 652 - 664
  • [5] Clinical performance of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy
    Benedikt Kranzbühler
    Hannes Nagel
    Anton S. Becker
    Julian Müller
    Martin Huellner
    Paul Stolzmann
    Urs Muehlematter
    Matthias Guckenberger
    Philipp A. Kaufmann
    Daniel Eberli
    Irene A. Burger
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2018, 45 : 20 - 30
  • [6] Clinical performance of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy
    Kranzbuhler, Benedikt
    Nagel, Hannes
    Becker, Anton S.
    Mueller, Julian
    Huellner, Martin
    Stolzmann, Paul
    Muehlematter, Urs
    Guckenberger, Matthias
    Kaufmann, Philipp A.
    Eberli, Daniel
    Burger, Irene A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2018, 45 (01) : 20 - 30
  • [7] 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT: the rising star of nuclear medicine in prostate cancer imaging?
    Uprimny, Christian
    WIENER MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2019, 169 (1-2) : 3 - 11
  • [8] Staging Prostate Cancer with 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in the Elderly: Is Preimaging Biopsy Imperative?
    Kesler, Mikhail
    Cohen, Dan
    Levine, Charles
    Sarid, David
    Keizman, Daniel
    Yossepowitch, Ofer
    Even-Sapir, Einat
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2023, 64 (07) : 1030 - 1035
  • [9] Comparison of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT With 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for Initial Staging in Intermediate- and High-Risk Prostate Cancer
    Chandekar, Kunal Ramesh
    Singh, Harmandeep
    Kumar, Rajender
    Kumar, Santosh
    Kakkar, Nandita
    Mittal, Bhagwant Rai
    Singh, Shrawan Kumar
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2023, 48 (01) : E1 - E8
  • [10] Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET-CT with mpMRI for preoperative lymph node staging in patients with intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer
    Qing Zhang
    Shiming Zang
    Chengwei Zhang
    Yao Fu
    Xiaoyu Lv
    Qinglei Zhang
    Yongming Deng
    Chuan Zhang
    Rui Luo
    Xiaozhi Zhao
    Wei Wang
    Feng Wang
    Hongqian Guo
    Journal of Translational Medicine, 15