Treatment outcomes of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in pancreatic cancer patients with malignant ascites

被引:0
|
作者
Inoue, Kanae [1 ]
Fukushi, Koh [1 ]
Yamaguchi, Shota [1 ]
Taira, Tomonao [1 ]
Shibuki, Taro [1 ,2 ]
Satake, Tomoyuki [1 ]
Watanabe, Kazuo [1 ]
Sasaki, Mitsuhito [1 ]
Imaoka, Hiroshi [1 ]
Mitsunaga, Shuichi [1 ]
Ikeda, Masafumi [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Canc Ctr Hosp East, Dept Hepatobiliary & Pancreat Oncol, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba 2778577, Japan
[2] Natl Canc Ctr Hosp East, Dept Promot Drug & Diagnost Dev, Div Drug & Diagnost Dev Promot, Translat Res Support Off, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba 2778577, Japan
关键词
Pancreatic cancer; Malignant ascites; Gemcitabine; Nab-paclitaxel; INTRAPERITONEAL PACLITAXEL; CHEMOTHERAPY; GUIDELINE; PROGNOSIS; SURVIVAL; S-1;
D O I
10.1016/j.pan.2024.03.015
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) therapy has been shown to improve the prognosis in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC); however, the efficacy and safety of GnP in PC patients with malignant ascites (MA) remains unknown. Methods: We retrospectively investigated PC patients with peritoneal dissemination who had received GnP as first-line chemotherapy at our institution between March 2015 and August 2021. The following patient data were reviewed: patient characteristics, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), adverse events (AEs), and relative dose intensity (RDI). The severity of MA was categorized based on the CT findings as grade 1 (small), grade 2 (moderate), or grade 3 (massive). Results: A total of 189 patients were included; the study endpoints were compared between patients with each ascites grade and 41 patients without MA. The MA was classified as grade 1 in 85 patients, grade 2 in 41 patients, and grade 3 in 22 patients. In the patients with MA, the median OS, PFS and ORR were 11.2 months, 5.7 months and 24.3%, respectively. The OS and PFS decreased with increasing the severity of MA; in particular, patients with grade 2 and 3 showed a poorer prognosis. There were no differences in AEs, except for anorexia, or the RDI according to the severity of MA. Conclusion: GnP showed moderate efficacy with manageable safety profile in PC patients with MA. However, PC patients with moderate to massive ascites still have a dismal prognosis, and further development of effective treatments is needed. (c) 2024 IAP and EPC. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:616 / 623
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Real-World Comparison of FOLFIRINOX, Gemcitabine Plus nab-Paclitaxel, and Gemcitabine in Advanced Pancreatic Cancers
    Wang, Ying
    Camateros, Pierre
    Cheung, Winson Y.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL CANCER, 2019, 50 (01) : 62 - 68
  • [42] The Efficacy and Safety of PD-1 Inhibitors Combined with Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine versus Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine in the First-Line Treatment of Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Retrospective Monocentric Study
    Zhang, Feng
    Wang, Yuyang
    Yang, Fangfang
    Zhang, Yuming
    Jiang, Man
    Zhang, Xiaochun
    CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2022, 14 : 535 - 546
  • [43] Comparison of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel and FOLFIRINOX in metastatic pancreatic cancer
    Han, Sung Yong
    Kim, Dong Uk
    Seol, Young Mi
    Kim, Suk
    Lee, Nam Kyung
    Hong, Seung Baek
    Seo, Hyung-Il
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES, 2020, 8 (17) : 3718 - 3729
  • [44] FOLFIRINOX vs gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel for treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer: Single-center cohort study
    In Rae Cho
    Huapyong Kang
    Jung Hyun Jo
    Hee Seung Lee
    Moon Jae Chung
    Jeong Youp Park
    Seung Woo Park
    Si Young Song
    Chansik An
    Mi-Suk Park
    Seungmin Bang
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology, 2020, 12 (02) : 182 - 194
  • [45] The effectiveness of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine and gemcitabine monotherapy in first-line metastatic pancreatic cancer treatment: A real-world evidence
    Prejac, Juraj
    Hamzic, Dora Tomek
    Librenjak, Niksa
    Gorsic, Irma
    Kekez, Domina
    Plestina, Stjepko
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (39) : E30566
  • [46] nab-Paclitaxel for the treatment of pancreatic cancer
    Kim, George
    CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2017, 9 : 85 - 96
  • [47] Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel for pancreatic cancer and interstitial lung disease: A nationwide longitudinal study
    Saito, Kei
    Michihata, Nobuaki
    Hamada, Tsuyoshi
    Jo, Taisuke
    Matsui, Hiroki
    Fushimi, Kiyohide
    Nakai, Yousuke
    Yasunaga, Hideo
    Fujishiro, Mitsuhiro
    CANCER SCIENCE, 2023, 114 (10) : 3996 - 4005
  • [48] FOLFIRINOX vs gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel for treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer: Single-center cohort study
    Cho, In Rae
    Kang, Huapyong
    Jo, Jung Hyun
    Lee, Hee Seung
    Chung, Moon Jae
    Park, Jeong Youp
    Park, Seung Woo
    Song, Si Young
    An, Chansik
    Park, Mi-Suk
    Bang, Seungmin
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 12 (02) : 182 - 194
  • [49] A phase I study of intraperitoneal paclitaxel combined with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel for pancreatic cancer with peritoneal metastasis
    Naminatsu Takahara
    Yousuke Nakai
    Hironori Ishigami
    Kei Saito
    Tatsuya Sato
    Ryunosuke Hakuta
    Kazunaga Ishigaki
    Tomotaka Saito
    Tsuyoshi Hamada
    Suguru Mizuno
    Hirofumi Kogure
    Hiroharu Yamashita
    Hiroyuki Isayama
    Yasuyuki Seto
    Kazuhiko Koike
    Investigational New Drugs, 2021, 39 : 175 - 181
  • [50] Multicenter Retrospective Analysis of Second-Line Therapy after Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Patients
    Merz, Valeria
    Cavaliere, Alessandro
    Messina, Carlo
    Salati, Massimiliano
    Zecchetto, Camilla
    Casalino, Simona
    Milella, Michele
    Caffo, Orazio
    Melisi, Davide
    CANCERS, 2020, 12 (05)