Efficacy of Silodosin and Tadalafil monotherapy versus combination of both drugs as MET for distal ureteric stones: A prospective, double blinded, randomized clinical trial

被引:0
|
作者
Diab, Tamer [1 ]
Fathi, Abdallah [1 ]
El-Dakhakhny, Amr S. [1 ]
Abou Elezz, Ahmed [1 ]
机构
[1] Benha Univ, Fac Med, Urol Dept, Qalubyia Governorate 13511, Benha, Egypt
关键词
Silodosin; Tadalafil; medical expulsive therapy; ureteric stones; MEDICAL EXPULSIVE THERAPY; ALPHA-BLOCKERS; PLUS TADALAFIL; TAMSULOSIN;
D O I
10.1080/20905998.2024.2403274
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess efficacy and safety of silodosin, tadalafil, versus combination of both medications as medical expulsive therapy (MET) for distal ureteric stones. Methods: This prospective, double blinded, randomized clinical trial included 128 patients aged 18 years or more irrespective of gender who are presented to emergency department or outpatient with distal ureteric stones ranging in size from 5-10 mm, randomized into three groups: Group I (n = 42) received Silodosin 8 mg once daily, Group II (n = 44) received Tadalafil 5 mg once daily, and Group III (n = 42) received Silodosin 8 mg combined with Tadalafil 5 mg one daily. All participants underwent thorough history-taking, routine laboratory investigations, and clinical examinations.The primary end point included expulsion rate and time and treatment tolerance. Secondary end points were number pain episodes, need for emergency room visit, amount of analgesia, need for intervention. Methods: This prospective, double blinded, randomized clinical trial included 128 patients aged 18 years or more irrespective of gender who are presented to emergency department or outpatient with distal ureteric stones ranging in size from 5-10 mm, randomized into three groups: Group I (n = 42) received Silodosin 8 mg once daily, Group II (n = 44) received Tadalafil 5 mg once daily, and Group III (n = 42) received Silodosin 8 mg combined with Tadalafil 5 mg one daily. All participants underwent thorough history-taking, routine laboratory investigations, and clinical examinations.The primary end point included expulsion rate and time and treatment tolerance. Secondary end points were number pain episodes, need for emergency room visit, amount of analgesia, need for intervention. ResultsThe expulsion rate was 71.4% for silodosin, 61.4% for tadalafil and 88.1% for combined therapy (p = 0.018). Expulsion time was significantly shorter after combined therapy 10.4 + 3.5 days, while after silodosin 14.1 + 4 days, while 17.8 + 3.4 days after tadalafil (p < 0.001). The number of pain episodes, emergency room visits, and the amount of analgesia were significantly in favour of combined therapy (p value 0.004, 0.010, and <0.001) respectively. Conclusions: A combination of Silodosin with Tadalafil as a MET for distal ureteric stones is more effective than monotherapy with tolerable side effects.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Optimum combined MET according to tolerability with efficacy, Silodosin Tadalafil versus Silodosin Vardenafil for distal ureteric stone: a prospective, double blinded, randomized clinical trial
    Diab, Tamer
    Noah, Kareem
    Farag, Mahmoud
    Shaher, Hussein
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2025, 57 (01) : 99 - 106
  • [2] Efficacy and safety of silodosin, vardenafil versus silodosin in combination with vardenafil as a medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteric stones: a prospective randomized double-blind study
    Samir, Mohamed
    Elawady, Hossam
    Hasan, Mohamed
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 26 (01)
  • [3] Efficacy and safety of silodosin, vardenafil versus silodosin in combination with vardenafil as a medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteric stones: a prospective randomized double-blind study
    Mohamed Samir
    Hossam Elawady
    Mohamed Hasan
    African Journal of Urology, 2020, 26
  • [4] Efficacy of Silodosin in Expulsive Therapy for Distal Ureteral Stones: A Randomized Double-blinded Controlled Trial
    Wang, Chung-Jing
    Tsai, Po-Chao
    Chang, Chien-Hsing
    UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2016, 13 (03) : 2666 - 2671
  • [5] Efficacy of silodosin on the outcome of semi-rigid ureteroscopy for the management of large distal ureteric stones: blinded randomised trial
    Mohey, Ahmed
    Gharib, Tarek M.
    Alazaby, Hisham
    Khalil, Mostafa
    Abou-Taleb, Ahmed
    Noureldin, Yasser A.
    ARAB JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 16 (04) : 422 - 428
  • [6] Comparative Efficacy of Tamsulosin Versus Tamsulosin With Tadalafil in Combination With Prednisolone for the Medical Expulsive Therapy of Lower Ureteric Stones: A Randomized Trial
    Kumar, Santosh
    Jayant, Kumar
    Agrawal, Swati
    Singh, Shrawan Kumar
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 55 (03) : 196 - 200
  • [7] Efficacy of Mirabegron as Medical Expulsive Therapy for Distal Ureteral Stones: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Controlled Study
    Morsy, Samer
    Nasser, Islam
    Aboulela, Waseem
    Abdelazim, Mohamed Salah
    Ali, Hussein
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2022, 106 (12) : 1265 - 1271
  • [8] Efficacy of tamsulosin versus tadalafil as medical expulsive therapy on stone expulsion in patients with distal ureteral stones: A randomized double-blind clinical trial
    Falahatkar, Siavash
    Akhavan, Ardalan
    Esmaeili, Samaneh
    Amin, Atiyeh
    Kazetnnezhad, Ehsan
    Jafari, Alireza
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2021, 47 (05): : 982 - 988
  • [9] A multicentre, prospective, randomized trial: comparative efficacy of tamsulosin and nifedipine in medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteric stones with renal colic
    Ye, Zhangqun
    Yang, Huan
    Li, Hong
    Zhang, Xiaochun
    Deng, Yaoliang
    Zeng, Guohua
    Chen, Lingwu
    Cheng, Yue
    Yang, Jianggen
    Mi, Qiwu
    Zhang, Yonghai
    Chen, Zhong
    Guo, Hui
    He, Wei
    Chen, Zhiqiang
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 108 (02) : 276 - 279
  • [10] Comparative efficacy of tadalafil versus tamsulosin as the medical expulsive therapy in lower ureteric stone: a prospective randomized trial
    Puvvada, Sandeep
    Mylarappa, Prasad
    Aggarwal, Kuldeep
    Patil, Avinash
    Joshi, Prarthan
    Desigowda, Ramesh
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (02) : 178 - 182