Team-based learning in health professions education: an umbrella review

被引:1
作者
Alizadeh, Maryam [1 ]
Masoomi, Rasoul [2 ]
Mafinejad, Mahboobeh Khabaz [1 ]
Parmelee, Dean [2 ]
Khalaf, Rusul Jasim [3 ]
Norouzi, Ali [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Educ Dev Ctr, Hlth Profess Educ Res Ctr, Dept Med Educ,Sch Med, Tehran, Iran
[2] Wright State Univ, Boonshoft Sch Med, Med Educ Psychiat & Pediat, Dayton, OH USA
[3] Univ Al Ameed, Coll Med, Karbala, Iraq
[4] Zanjan Univ Med Sci, Med Educ Res Ctr, Educ Dev Ctr EDC, Zanjan, Iran
[5] Zanjan Univ Med Sci, Social Determinants Hlth Res Ctr, Zanjan, Iran
关键词
Team based learning; Umbrella review; Health professions education; ESTABLISHED GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1186/s12909-024-06147-x
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
BackgroundTeam-Based Learning (TBL) has garnered considerable attention in education research. To consolidate the existing evidence, we conducted an umbrella review with four objectives: (a) to identify TBL review characteristics, (b) to synthesize findings from previous reviews regarding TBL effectiveness and outcomes, (c) to determine which student groups benefit most, and (d) to identify the most and least researched elements.MethodsThe Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology was followed: [1] Search strategy and literature search [2] Screening and Study Selection [3] Assessment of methodological quality [4] Data collection, and [5] Data summary. We utilized Endnote, Excel, and MAXQDA for efficient project management and analyzing data.ResultsAnalyzing twenty-three reviews spanning from 2013 to 2024, we found a peak in TBL research in 2022 including more than 312 unique primary studies involving more than 63,987 participants. Notably, the United States and China accounted for over 61% of the total primary articles focused on students from medicine, nursing, pharmacy, and dentistry. Evidence supports the superiority of TBL in enhancing cognitive outcomes. However, findings related to retention are mixed. Insufficient evidence exists to draw robust conclusions when comparing TBL with other active learning methods. TBL demonstrates favorable outcomes in terms of clinical performance and engagement. Non-technical skills show mixed results. Notably, TBL positively impacts self-study, learning ability, decision-making, and emotional intelligence. Faculty experiences reveal an initial increase in workload, but generally hold positive attitude. Faculty development remain limited in duration and scope. Freshmen, academically weaker students, undergraduates, Chinese female students, and nursing students appear to benefit most from TBL. Team formation and size are the most frequently studied elements.ConclusionTBL holds promise for improving learning outcomes, but ongoing investigation is essential to maximize its impact in diverse educational contexts. This umbrella review underscores the need for further research in specific areas i.e. effective pre-class learning methods and faculty workload.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [11] Chytas D., 2023, Morphologie, V107, P176, DOI 10.1016/j.morpho.2022.09.001
  • [12] Specific Elements of Team-Based Learning Used in Nursing Education A Scoping Review
    Considine, Julie
    Berry, Debra
    Allen, Joshua
    Hewitt, Nicky
    Oldland, Elizabeth
    Sprogis, Stephanie K.
    Currey, Judy
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATOR, 2021, 46 (05) : E84 - E89
  • [13] Team-based learning in nursing education: A scoping review
    Considine, Julie
    Berry, Debra
    Allen, Joshua
    Hewitt, Nicky
    Oldland, Elizabeth
    Sprogis, Stephanie K.
    Currey, Judy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2021, 30 (7-8) : 903 - 917
  • [14] Integration of Team-Based Learning Strategies Into a Cardiovascular Module
    Conway, Susan E.
    Johnson, Jeremy L.
    Ripley, Toni L.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION, 2010, 74 (02)
  • [15] Team based learning in nursing and midwifery higher education; a systematic review of the evidence for change
    Dearnley, Chris
    Rhodes, Christine
    Roberts, Peter
    Williams, Pam
    Prenton, Sarah
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2018, 60 : 75 - 83
  • [16] Dent J., 2021, A practical guide for medical teachers A practical guide for medical teachers, V6th
  • [17] Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom
    Deslauriers, Louis
    McCarty, Logan S.
    Miller, Kelly
    Callaghan, Kristina
    Kestin, Greg
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2019, 116 (39) : 19251 - 19257
  • [18] The effectiveness of team-based learning on learning outcomes in health professions education: BEME Guide No. 30
    Fatmi, Mim
    Hartling, Lisa
    Hillier, Tracey
    Campbell, Sandra
    Oswald, Anna E.
    [J]. MEDICAL TEACHER, 2013, 35 (12) : E1608 - E1624
  • [19] Gera M, 2023, East J Med Sci, P1
  • [20] Haidet Paul, 2014, J Excell Coll Teach, V25, P303