Clinical Validation of Carotid-Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity Measurement Using a Multi-Beam Laser Vibrometer: The CARDIS Study

被引:0
|
作者
Badhwar, Smriti [1 ]
Marais, Louise [1 ]
Khettab, Hakim [2 ]
Poli, Federica [1 ]
Li, Yanlu [4 ,5 ]
Segers, Patrick [6 ]
Aasmul, Soren [7 ]
de Melis, Mirko [7 ]
Baets, Roel [4 ,5 ]
Greenwald, Steve [8 ]
Bruno, Rosa Maria [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Boutouyrie, Pierre [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Paris Cardiovasc Res Ctr PARCC, Inst Natl Sante & Rech Med INSERM, Paris, France
[2] Hop Europeen Georges Pompidou HEGP, AP HP, Paris, France
[3] Univ Paris Cite, Fac Med, Paris, France
[4] Ghent Univ imec, Photon Res Grp, Ghent, Belgium
[5] Univ Ghent, Ctr Nano & Biophoton, Ghent, Belgium
[6] Univ Ghent, IBiTech BioMMedA, Ghent, Belgium
[7] Medtron Bakken Res Ctr, Maastricht, Netherlands
[8] Queen Mary Univ London, Blizard Inst, Barts & London Sch Med & Dent, London, England
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
cardiovascular diseases; carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity; optics and photonics; risk factors; vascular stiffness; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK-FACTORS; ARTERIAL STIFFNESS; AORTIC STIFFNESS; DOPPLER VIBROMETER; REPRODUCIBILITY; MECHANISMS;
D O I
10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.124.22729
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND:Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) is the gold standard for noninvasive arterial stiffness assessment, an independent predictor of cardiovascular disease, and a potential parameter to guide therapy. However, cfPWV is not routinely measured in clinical practice due to the unavailability of a low-cost, operator-friendly, and independent device. The current study validated a novel laser Doppler vibrometry (LDV)-based measurement of cfPWV against the reference technique. METHODS:In 100 (50 men) hypertensive patients, cfPWV was measured using applanation tonometry (Sphygmocor) and the novel LDV device. This device has 2 handpieces with 6 laser beams each that simultaneously measure vibrations from the skin surface at carotid and femoral sites. Pulse wave velocity is calculated using ECG for the identification of cardiac cycles. An ECG-independent method was also devised. Cardiovascular risk score was calculated for patients between 40 and 75 years old using the WHO risk scoring chart. RESULTS:LDV-based cfPWV correlated significantly with tonometry (r=0.86, P<0.0001 ECG-dependent [cfPWVLDV_ECG] and r=0.80, P<0.001 ECG-independent [cfPWVLDV_w/oECG] methods). Bland-Altman analysis showed nonsignificant bias (0.65 m/s) and acceptable SD (1.27 m/s) between methods. Intraobserver coefficient of variance for LDV was 4.7% (95% CI, 3.0%-5.5%), and interobserver coefficient of variance was 5.87%. CfPWV correlated significantly with CVD risk (r=0.64, P<0.001; r=0.41, P=0.003; and r=0.37, P=0.006 for tonometry, LDV-with, and LDV-without ECG, respectively). CONCLUSIONS:The study demonstrates clinical validity of the LDV device. The LDV provides a simple, noninvasive, operator-independent method to measure cfPWV for assessing arterial stiffness, comparable to the standard existing techniques.
引用
收藏
页码:1986 / 1995
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] AORTIC AND CAROTID-FEMORAL PULSE WAVE VELOCITY - DETERMINANTS OF DIFFERENCES
    Weber, T.
    Ammer, M.
    Rammer, M.
    O'rourke, Mf.
    Wassertheurer, S.
    Eber, B.
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2009, 27 : S232 - S232
  • [22] NON-INVASIVE MEASUREMENT OF HEART-FEMORAL PULSE WAVE VELOCITY: CORRELATES, REPRODUCIBILITY AND COMPARISON WITH CAROTID-FEMORAL PULSE WAVE VELOCITY
    Magistri, C.
    Raso, F. U. S. Mattace
    Battista, F.
    Anastasio, F.
    Pucci, G.
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2018, 36 : E224 - E224
  • [23] Outcome Associations of Carotid-Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity Vary With Different Measurement Methods
    Girerd, Nicolas
    Legedz, Liliana
    Paget, Vinciane
    Rabilloud, Muriel
    Milon, Hugues
    Bricca, Giampiero
    Lantelme, Pierre
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2012, 25 (12) : 1264 - 1270
  • [24] CAROTID-FEMORAL PULSE WAVE VELOCITY ASSESSED BY ULTRASOUND: A STUDY WITH ECHOTRACKING TECHNOLOGY
    Collette, Mathieu
    Palombo, Carlo
    Morizzo, Carmela
    Sbragi, Sara
    Kozakova, Michaela
    Leftheriotis, Georges
    ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2017, 43 (06): : 1187 - 1194
  • [25] Comparability and reproducibility of the carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity measurements using a multi-element carotid tonometry sensor
    I Ueda
    T Tagawa
    S Watanabe
    K Yamakawa
    T Yasu
    S Ueda
    Journal of Human Hypertension, 2008, 22 : 699 - 703
  • [26] The impact of age and risk factors on carotid and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity
    Kozakova, Michaela
    Morizzo, Carmela
    Guarino, Daniela
    Federico, Giovanni
    Miccoli, Mario
    Giannattasio, Cristina
    Palombo, Carlo
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2015, 33 (07) : 1446 - 1451
  • [27] Comparability and reproducibility of the carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity measurements using a multi-element carotid tonometry sensor
    Ueda, I.
    Tagawa, T.
    Watanabe, S.
    Yamakawa, K.
    Yasu, T.
    Ueda, S.
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION, 2008, 22 (10) : 699 - 703
  • [28] Expert consensus document on the measurement of aortic stiffness in daily practice using carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity
    Van Bortel, Luc M.
    Laurent, Stephane
    Boutouyrie, Pierre
    Chowienczyk, Phil
    Cruickshank, J. K.
    De Backer, Tine
    Filipovsky, Jan
    Huybrechts, Sofie
    Mattace-Raso, Francesco U. S.
    Protogerou, Athanase D.
    Schillaci, Giuseppe
    Segers, Patrick
    Vermeersch, Sebastian
    Weber, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2012, 30 (03) : 445 - 448
  • [29] P145: Measurement of Blood Pressure Dependency of Carotid-Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity
    Mark Butlin
    Isabella Tan
    Fatemeh Shirbani
    Bart Spronck
    Alberto Avolio
    Artery Research, 2017, 20 (1) : 97 - 98
  • [30] Impact of Central Obesity on the Estimation of Carotid-Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity
    Canepa, Marco
    AlGhatrif, Majd
    Pestelli, Gabriele
    Kankaria, Rohan
    Makrogiannis, Sokratis
    Strait, James B.
    Brunelli, Claudio
    Lakatta, Edward G.
    Ferrucci, Luigi
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2014, 27 (09) : 1209 - 1217