Clinicopathological and molecular differences between stage IV screen-detected and interval colorectal cancers in the Flemish screening program

被引:0
|
作者
Neefs, Isabelle [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Tran, Thuy Ngan [5 ,6 ]
Ferrari, Allegra [5 ,7 ]
Janssens, Sharon [8 ]
Van Herck, Koen [2 ,8 ]
Op de Beeck, Ken [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Van Camp, Guy [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Peeters, Marc [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Fransen, Erik [1 ,2 ]
Hoeck, Sarah [5 ,6 ]
Van Hal, Guido [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Antwerp, Ctr Med Genet, Edegem, Belgium
[2] Antwerp Univ Hosp UZA, Edegem, Belgium
[3] Univ Antwerp, Ctr Oncol Res Antwerp CORE, Antwerp, Belgium
[4] Antwerp Univ Hosp UZA, Antwerp, Belgium
[5] Univ Antwerp, Dept Family Med & Populat Hlth FAMPOP, Res Grp Social Epidemiol & Hlth Policy, Antwerp, Belgium
[6] Ctr Canc Detect, Brugge, Belgium
[7] Univ Genoa, Dept Hlth Sci DISSAL, Genoa, Italy
[8] Belgian Canc Registry, Brussels, Belgium
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2024年 / 14卷
关键词
colorectal cancer; clinicopathological differences; interval cancer; molecular alterations; screening; FEATURES; TUMOR; COLONOSCOPY; BIOMARKERS; GUIDELINE; DIAGNOSIS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2024.1409196
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction Interval cancer (IC) is an important quality indicator in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Previously, we found that fecal immunochemical test (FIT) ICs are more common in women, older age, right-sided tumors, and advanced stage. Here, we extended our existing stage IV patient cohort with clinicopathological and molecular characteristics, to identify factors associated with FIT-IC.Methods Logistic regression models were fit to identify variables associated with the odds of having a stage IV FIT-IC. Multivariate models were corrected for gender, age, and location.Results A total of 292 screen-detected (SD) CRCs and 215 FIT-IC CRCs were included. FIT-IC CRC had 5 fold higher odds to be a neuroendocrine (NET) tumor and 2.5 fold higher odds to have lymphovascular invasion. Interestingly, some variables lost significance upon accounting for location. Thus, tumor location is a critical covariate that should always be included when evaluating factors related to FIT-IC.Conclusions We identified NETs and lymphovascular invasion as factors associated with increased odds of having a stage IV FIT-IC. Moreover, we highlight the importance of tumor location as a covariate in evaluating FIT-IC related factors. More research across all stages is needed to clarify how these insights might help to optimize the Flemish CRC screening program.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [31] Differential expression of prognostic biomarkers between interval and screen-detected breast cancers: does age or family history matter?
    Jan T. Lowery
    Tim Byers
    John Kittelson
    John E. Hokanson
    Judy Mouchawar
    John Lewin
    Dan Merrick
    Lisa Hines
    Meenakshi Singh
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2011, 129 : 211 - 219
  • [32] Clinicopathological characteristics and survival of FIT interval cancers in a population colorectal cancer screening program: An analysis of cases in five institutes in Taiwan
    Chang, W. Y.
    Chang, A. T.
    Hsu, W. F.
    Chou, C. K.
    Chang, C. C.
    Chen, M. Y.
    Lin, Y. M.
    Chiu, H. M.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2021, 36 : 250 - 250
  • [33] Size distribution of screen-detected and interval cancers according to breast density suggests reduced screening benefit for women with higher density breasts
    C Nickson
    AM Kavanagh
    GB Byrnes
    Breast Cancer Research, 6 (Suppl 1)
  • [34] Differences in patient- and tumor characteristics, treatment and survival between patients with screen-detected versus clinically detected colorectal peritoneal metastases
    Galanos, L. J. K.
    Rijken, A.
    Elferink, M. A. G.
    Boerma, D.
    Brandt-Kerkhof, A.
    de Reuver, P. R.
    Tuynman, J. B.
    Kok, N. F. M.
    Hemmer, P. H. J.
    van Grevenstein, W. M. U.
    Huysentruyt, C.
    van Erning, F. N.
    de Hingh, I. H. J. T.
    EJSO, 2025, 51 (01):
  • [35] Digital vs screen-film mammography in population-based breast cancer screening: performance indicators and tumour characteristics of screen-detected and interval cancers
    Linda de Munck
    Geertruida H de Bock
    Renée Otter
    Dick Reiding
    Mireille JM Broeders
    Pax HB Willemse
    Sabine Siesling
    British Journal of Cancer, 2016, 115 : 517 - 524
  • [36] Digital vs screen-film mammography in population-based breast cancer screening: performance indicators and tumour characteristics of screen-detected and interval cancers
    de Munck, Linda
    de Bock, Geertruida H.
    Otter, Renee
    Reiding, Dick
    Broeders, Mireille J. M.
    Willemse, Pax H. B.
    Siesling, Sabine
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2016, 115 (05) : 517 - 524
  • [37] Screen-detected and interval breast cancer after concordant and discordant interpretations in a population based screening program using independent double reading
    Martiniussen, Marit A.
    Sagstad, Silje
    Larsen, Marthe
    Larsen, Anne Sofie F.
    Hovda, Tone
    Lee, Christoph I.
    Hofvind, Solveig
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2022, 32 (09) : 5974 - 5985
  • [38] Screen-detected and interval breast cancer after concordant and discordant interpretations in a population based screening program using independent double reading
    Marit A. Martiniussen
    Silje Sagstad
    Marthe Larsen
    Anne Sofie F. Larsen
    Tone Hovda
    Christoph I. Lee
    Solveig Hofvind
    European Radiology, 2022, 32 : 5974 - 5985
  • [39] Interval cancers after negative immunochemical test compared to screen and non-resporders' detected canters in Slovenian colorectal cancer screening programme
    Mlakar, Dominika Novak
    Bric, Tatjana Kofol
    Skrjanec, Ana Lucija
    Krajc, Mateja
    RADIOLOGY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 52 (04) : 413 - 421
  • [40] Association between Endoscopist Volume and Interval Cancers after Colonoscopy: Results from the National Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in Korea
    Kim, Dong Jun
    Yoon, Nan-He
    Jun, Jae Kwan
    Suh, Mina
    Lee, Sunhwa
    Kim, Seongju
    Kim, Ji Eun
    Lee, Hooyeon
    CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2024, 56 (04): : 1164 - 1170