Is clinical target volume necessary for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with 4D-CT intensity-modulated radiation therapy

BackgroundA dosimetric evaluation is still lacking in terms of clinical target volume (CTV) omission in stage III patients treated with 4D-CT Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT).Methods49 stage III NSCLC patients received 4D-CT IMRT were reviewed. Target volumes and organs at risk (OARs) were re-delineated. Four IMRT plans were conducted retrospectively to deliver different prescribed dose (74 Gy-60 Gy), and with or without CTV implementation. Dose and volume histogram (DVH) parameters were collected and compared.ResultsIn the PTV-g 60 Gy plan (PTV-g refers to the PTV generated from the internal gross tumor volume), only 5 of 49 patients had the isodose >= 50 Gy line covering at least 95% of the PTV-c (PTV-c refers to the PTV generated from the internal CTV) volume. When the prescribed dose was elevated to 74 Gy to the PTV-g, 33 of 49 patients could have the isodose >= 50 Gy line covering at least 95% of the PTV-c volume. In terms of OARs protection, the SIB-IMRT plan showed the lowest value of V5, V20, and mean dose of lung, had the lowest V55 of esophagus, and the lowest estimated radiation doses to immune cells (EDIC). The V20, V30, and mean dose of heart was lower in the simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) IMRT (SIB-IMRT) plan than that of the PTV-c 60 Gy plan.ConclusionsCTV omission was not suitable for stage III patients when the prescribed dose to PTV-g was 60 Gy in the era of 4D-CT IMRT. CTV omission plus high dose to PTV-g (74 Gy for example) warranted further exploration. The SIB-IMRT plan had the best protection to normal tissue including lymphocytes, and might be the optimal choice.