AI in higher education: a systematic literature review

被引:1
作者
Castillo-Martinez, Isolda Margarita [1 ]
Flores-Bueno, Daniel [2 ]
Gomez-Puente, Sonia M. [3 ]
Vite-Leon, Victor O. [2 ]
机构
[1] Monterrey Inst Technol & Higher Educ, Sch Humanities & Educ, Monterrey, Mexico
[2] Peruvian Univ Appl Sci, Lima, Peru
[3] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Acad Gen Affairs, Eindhoven, Netherlands
关键词
artificial intelligence; systematic literature review; scientific research; higher education; ChatGPT; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE;
D O I
10.3389/feduc.2024.1391485
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Introduction The increasing reliance on technology within higher education necessitates a thorough examination of artificial intelligence's (AI) application in academic research. This analysis aims to elucidate both the advantages and challenges associated with AI utilization, thereby paving the way for future inquiries. Such studies will be instrumental in delineating strategies for the effective integration of AI tools in scholarly research, ensuring their optimal use in advancing the field. Objective The purpose of this research is to identify the benefits and challenges of the use of AI in the field of scientific research by analyzing experiences that have implemented AI in scientific research carried out at the university level through a systematic literature review. Method The research questions that guided the systematic literature review were as follows: (1) What are the benefits of using AI in research? (2) What are the challenges of using AI in research? (3) What are the use and benefits of AI in scientific writing including limitations? (4) What are the main lines of research identified in studies that address scientific practice with artificial intelligence in the university context? The articles analyzed were published in 2023. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 85 articles were analyzed. Results The analysis allowed findings such as the usefulness of ChatGPT in different disciplinary areas, challenges such as being able to identify artificial intelligence resources limitations and benefits such as being able to make processes of different kinds more efficient. Discussion It was possible to establish that although the studies analyzed identified advantages in the application of AI in scientific research, it was also detected that it is necessary to have a critical and creative look to make use of AI resources, such as ChatGPT, in order to use them only as support tools and thus be able to take care of the rigor and quality in the elaboration of scientific texts.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] A comparison of ChatGPT-generated articles with human-written articles
    Ariyaratne, Sisith
    Iyengar, Karthikeyan. P.
    Nischal, Neha
    Chitti Babu, Naparla
    Botchu, Rajesh
    [J]. SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2023, 52 (09) : 1755 - 1758
  • [2] Coeytaux R., 2014, Evidence Map of Yoga for High-Impact Conditions Affecting Veterans (US Department of Veterans Affairs Evidence-based Synthesis Program)
  • [3] Leadership is needed for ethical ChatGPT: Character, assessment, and learning using artifiicial intelligence (AI)
    Crawford, Joseph
    Cowling, Michael
    Allen, Kelly -Ann
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UNIVERSITY TEACHING AND LEARNING PRACTICE, 2023, 20 (03)
  • [4] From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing
    Dergaa, Ismail
    Chamari, Karim
    Zmijewski, Piotr
    Saad, Helmi Ben
    [J]. BIOLOGY OF SPORT, 2023, 40 (02) : 615 - 622
  • [5] ChatGPT for (Finance) research: The Bananarama Conjecture
    Dowling, Michael
    Lucey, Brian
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2023, 53
  • [6] Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers
    Gao, Catherine A.
    Howard, Frederick M.
    Markov, Nikolay S.
    Dyer, Emma C.
    Ramesh, Siddhi
    Luo, Yuan
    Pearson, Alexander T.
    [J]. NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE, 2023, 6 (01)
  • [7] A systematic literature review of the representations of migration in Brazil and the United Kingdom
    Goncalves, Isabella
    David, Yossi
    [J]. COMUNICAR, 2022, 30 (71)
  • [8] Artificial intelligence in medicine
    Hamet, Pavel
    Tremblay, Johanne
    [J]. METABOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 2017, 69 : S36 - S40
  • [9] Kitchenham B., 2007, GUIDELINES PERFORMIN