How does colour predict multiple object tracking performance? The role of surface feature in attentive tracking

被引:0
作者
Wang, Chundi [1 ]
Zhang, Yiyue [1 ]
Zhang, Xuemin [2 ]
Hu, Luming [3 ]
Deng, Hu [4 ]
机构
[1] Beihang Univ, Sch Humanities & Social Sci, Dept Psychol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Normal Univ, Fac Psychol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Normal Univ Zhuhai, Sch Arts & Sci, Dept Psychol, Zhuhai, Peoples R China
[4] Peking Univ, Beijing Huilongguan Hosp, Huilongguan Clin Med Sch, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Multiple object tracking; surface feature complexity; target distractor distinctiveness; attentional resources; device type; VISUAL WORKING-MEMORY; FEATURE BINDING; SEARCH; INHIBITION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1080/13506285.2024.2389454
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Simultaneously tracking multiple unique dynamic objects, such as watching soccer games, is common in everyday life. However, the role of intragroup and intergroup features in this cognitive process remains unclear. We set up different colour combinations to investigate the effect of distinctiveness between target and distractor sets (DTD), the complexity of the target set (CT) and distractor set (CD) on multiple object tracking (MOT) on PCs and iPads, and used multiple linear regression to fit the relationship between these factors and tracking performance. The models support our hypothesis, showing that DTD contributes most to the interpretation of tracking performance, followed by CT, while CD has no effect. Furthermore, CT effect is modulated by DTD level. This study demonstrates that DTD and CT jointly contribute to predicting MOT performance regardless of devices. Thus, it would provide the theoretical basis for the future development of MOT-based cognitive applications on mobile devices.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 81
页数:15
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] NEW LOOK AT STATISTICAL-MODEL IDENTIFICATION
    AKAIKE, H
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1974, AC19 (06) : 716 - 723
  • [2] Multiple-target tracking: A role for working memory?
    Allen, R
    McGeorge, P
    Pearson, DG
    Milne, A
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 59 (06) : 1101 - 1116
  • [3] How many objects can you track? Evidence for a resource-limited attentive tracking mechanism
    Alvarez, George A.
    Franconeri, Steven L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VISION, 2007, 7 (13):
  • [4] Effects of target enhancement and distractor suppression on multiple object tracking capacity
    Bettencourt, Katherine C.
    Somers, David C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VISION, 2009, 9 (07):
  • [5] The psychophysics toolbox
    Brainard, DH
    [J]. SPATIAL VISION, 1997, 10 (04): : 433 - 436
  • [6] The what-where trade-off in multiple-identity tracking
    Cohen, Michael A.
    Pinto, Yair
    Howe, Piers D. L.
    Horowitz, Todd S.
    [J]. ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2011, 73 (05) : 1422 - 1434
  • [7] Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain
    Corbetta, M
    Shulman, GL
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2002, 3 (03) : 201 - 215
  • [8] The reorienting system of the human brain: From environment to theory of mind
    Corbetta, Maurizio
    Patel, Gaurav
    Shulman, Gordon L.
    [J]. NEURON, 2008, 58 (03) : 306 - 324
  • [9] Contextual Knowledge Configures Attentional Control Networks
    DiQuattro, Nicholas E.
    Geng, Joy J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 31 (49) : 18026 - 18035
  • [10] Swapping or dropping? Electrophysiological measures of difficulty during multiple object tracking
    Drew, Trafton
    Horowitz, Todd S.
    Vogel, Edward K.
    [J]. COGNITION, 2013, 126 (02) : 213 - 223