Enhancing nursing students' clinical competency using a multi-patient simulation learning model: A randomized controlled study

被引:1
作者
Fung, John Tai Chun [1 ]
Chan, Siu Ling [1 ]
Chan, Chun Kit [1 ]
Lam, Choi Fung [1 ]
Chau, Yuk Shuen [1 ]
Lam, Wing Hang [1 ]
Cheng, Christopher Chi Wai [1 ]
Lai, Man Hin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hong Kong, Li Ka Shing Fac Med, Sch Nursing, Pokfulam, 5-F,Acad Bldg,3 Sassoon Rd, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Multi-patient simulation; High-fidelity simulation; Prioritization competency; Clinical competence; Nursing education; Randomized controlled trial; METACOGNITION; EDUCATION; RELIABILITY; SKILLS;
D O I
10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106292
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: For nurses, clinical competency is paramount in ensuring that patients receive safe, high-quality care. Multi-patient simulation (MPS) in nursing education is gaining attention, and evidence shows its suitability for real-life situations. MPS can be an effective solution for nurses' continuing clinical education. Objectives: This project compares the effectiveness of MPS (involving both a standardized patient and a high fidelity simulator) and a single high-fidelity simulation (single HFS; only involving a high fidelity simulator) for enhancing the clinical competency of nursing students. Design: A stratified, permuted, block randomized controlled study design was used. Settings and participants. Sixty undergraduate nursing students in years 3, 4, and 5 were selected to participate. Subgroups with each comprising three undergraduate nursing students from different years were formed. Methods: The participants were randomized to receive either an MPS (intervention group) or single HFS (control group) for 1 day; they later received the same intervention after a 30-day washout period. One objectively measured questionnaire and two self-reported questionnaires were used to measure clinical competency: the Creighton Competency Evaluation Instrument (CCEI), Clinical Competence Questionnaire (CCQ), and Simulation Effectiveness Tool - Modified Questionnaire (SET-M). Results: The results revealed significant between-group differences. Specifically, the intervention group showed greater improvement than the control group in both the CCQ (linear contrast [d] = 71.4; 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 53.407, 89.393; P < 0.001) and CCEI total scores (d = 7.17; 95 % CI = 5.837, 8.503; P < 0.001). The SET-M results indicated that 85 % of the participants (n = 51) strongly agreed that they felt more confident about performing a patient handover to the healthcare team after the simulation. Conclusions: The study findings indicated that both the MPS and single HFS effectively enhanced students' clinical competency. However, MPSs have superior educational outcomes relative to traditional single HFSs.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   What are the factors that enhance metacognitive skills in nursing students? A systematic review [J].
Asadzandi, Shadi ;
Mojtahedzadeh, Rita ;
Mohammadi, Aeen .
IRANIAN JOURNAL OF NURSING AND MIDWIFERY RESEARCH, 2022, 27 (06) :475-484
[2]   The interrelationships between student approaches to learning and group work [J].
Beccaria, Lisa ;
Kek, Megan ;
Huijser, Henk ;
Rose, Jayln ;
Kimmins, Lindy .
NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2014, 34 (07) :1094-1103
[3]   Social Cognitive Theory, Metacognition, and Simulation Learning in Nursing Education [J].
Burke, Helen ;
Mancuso, Lorraine .
JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION, 2012, 51 (10) :543-548
[4]   Virtual versus face-to-face clinical simulation in relation to student knowledge, anxiety, and self-confidence in maternal-newborn nursing: A randomized controlled trial [J].
Cobbett, Shelley ;
Snelgrove-Clarke, Erna .
NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2016, 45 :179-184
[5]   A Randomized Trial of Multiple-Patient Simulation Preparation to Improve Novice Nurses' Competence and Self-Efficacy [J].
Franklin, Ashley E. ;
Sideras, Stephanie ;
Dodd, Caitlin ;
Hutson, Jeremy .
NURSING EDUCATION PERSPECTIVES, 2020, 41 (03) :146-151
[6]   Virtual simulation and problem-based learning enhance perceived clinical and cultural competence of nursing students in Asia: A randomized controlled cross-over study [J].
Fung, John Tai Chun ;
Chan, Siu Ling ;
Takemura, Naomi ;
Chiu, Hsiao-Yean ;
Huang, Hui-Chuan ;
Lee, Jong-Eun ;
Preechawong, Sunida ;
Hyun, Mi Yuel ;
Sun, Mei ;
Xia, Wei ;
Xiao, Jinnan ;
Lin, Chia-Chin .
NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2023, 123
[7]   Chinese version of the clinical learning environment comparison survey: Assessment of reliability and validity [J].
Gu, Yao-Hua ;
Xiong, Li ;
Bai, Jin-Bing ;
Hu, Jing ;
Tan, Xiao-Dong .
NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2018, 71 :121-128
[8]  
Halfwerk F.R., 2023, International Journal of Healthcare Simulation, DOI [10.54531/fpkb4904, DOI 10.54531/FPKB4904]
[9]   Reliability and Validity Testing of the Creighton Competency Evaluation Instrument for Use in the NCSBN National Simulation Study [J].
Hayden, Jennifer ;
Keegan, Mary ;
Kardong-Edgren, Suzan ;
Smiley, Richard A. .
NURSING EDUCATION PERSPECTIVES, 2014, 35 (04) :244-252
[10]   Factors affecting metacognition of undergraduate nursing students in a blended learning environment [J].
Hsu, Li-Ling ;
Hsieh, Suh-Ing .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING PRACTICE, 2014, 20 (03) :233-241