Assessment of air quality in the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania subway

被引:1
|
作者
Karim, Anjum Shahina [1 ]
Malone, Maeve [1 ]
Bruno, Alex [1 ]
Eggler, Aimee L. [2 ]
Posner, Michael A. [3 ]
Shakya, Kabindra M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Villanova Univ, Dept Geog & Environm, Villanova, PA 19085 USA
[2] Villanova Univ, Dept Chem, Villanova, PA USA
[3] Villanova Univ, Dept Math & Stat, Villanova, PA USA
关键词
Air Pollution; Exposure assessment; Indoor dust/house dust/dust; Inhalation Exposure; Particulate Matter; AIRBORNE PARTICULATE MATTER; BLACK CARBON; ULTRAFINE PARTICLES; EXPOSURE; POLLUTION; POLLUTANTS; PM2.5; DUST; CITY; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1038/s41370-024-00711-9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Background: Subways are popular and efficient modes of transportation in cities. However, people are exposed to high levels of particulate matter (PM) in subways. Subway air quality in the United States has been investigated in a few cities, but data is lacking on simultaneous measurement of several pollutants, especially ultrafine particles (UFP) and black carbon (BC), in combination with different size fractions of PM. Objectives: The goals of this study are to assess air quality in a belowground subway and compare it with outdoor ambient levels, to examine temporal variability of PM in the subway, and to analyze the correlation between PM and BC. Methods: Particulate matter of varying sizes (PM1, PM2.5, PM10), UFP, and BC were measured using DustTrak, nanoparticle detector, and micro aethalometer, respectively. Measurements were made at the belowground subway platform and the aboveground street level at 15th Street subway station in Philadelphia during summer 2022. Results: Belowground mean PM1, PM2.5, and PM10 were 112.2 +/- 61.3 mu g/m(3), 120 +/- 65.5 mu g/m(3), and 182.1 +/- 132 mu g/m(3), respectively, which were 5.4, 5.7, and 7.6 times higher than the respective aboveground street levels. The UFP lung deposited surface area (LDSA) (59.4 +/- 36.2 mu m(2)/cm(3)) and BC (9.5 +/- 5.4 mu g/m(3)) belowground were 1.7 times and 10.7 times higher than the aboveground. The pollutant concentration varied from day-to-day on both the locations. A higher positive correlation was found between the belowground BC and PM2.5 (r = 0.51, p < 0.05) compared to the aboveground (r = 0.16, p < 0.05). Impact: This study showed high levels of particulate matter exposure at a belowground subway station in Philadelphia. Particulate matter levels were about 5 to 8 times higher at belowground subway station than the corresponding aboveground street level. Higher levels were also observed for UFP lung deposited surface area (LDSA), while black carbon levels showed the highest concentration at the belowground level by a factor of ten compared to the aboveground level. The study shows the need for air quality management at belowground subways to reduce particulate matter exposure for the commuters.
引用
收藏
页码:196 / 204
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Environmental indicators in EpiAir2 project: air quality data for epidemiological surveillance
    Gandini, Martina
    Berti, Giovanna
    Cattani, Giorgio
    Faustini, Annunziata
    Scarinzi, Cecilia
    Donato, Francesca De'
    Accetta, Gabriele
    Angiuli, Lorenzo
    Caldara, Salvatore
    Carreras, Giulia
    Casale, Patrizia
    Di Biagio, Katiuscia
    Giannini, Simone
    Iuzzolino, Cinzia
    Lanzani, Guido
    Lauriola, Paolo
    Leuci, Paola
    Mariuz, Marika
    Marchesi, Stefano
    Nocioni, Alessandra
    Pistollato, Silvia
    Pizzi, Lorenzo
    Ranzi, Andrea
    Serinelli, Maria
    Stagnaro, Emanuele
    Vianello, Luisa
    Vigotti, Mariangela
    Zauli-Sajani, Stefano
    Cadum, Ennio
    EPIDEMIOLOGIA & PREVENZIONE, 2013, 37 (4-5): : 209 - 219
  • [22] Evaluation of the air quality benefits of the subway system in Sao Paulo, Brazil
    Pereira da Silva, Cacilda Bastos
    Nascimento Saldiva, Paulo Hilario
    Amato-Lourenco, Luis Fernando
    Rodrigues-Silva, Fernando
    El Khouri Miraglia, Simone Georges
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2012, 101 : 191 - 196
  • [23] Assessment of indoor air quality in office buildings across Europe - The OFFICAIR study
    Mandin, Corinne
    Trantallidi, Marilena
    Cattaneo, Andrea
    Canha, Nuno
    Mihucz, Victor G.
    Szigeti, Tamas
    Mabilia, Rosanna
    Perreca, Erica
    Spinazze, Andrea
    Fossati, Serena
    De Kluizenaar, Yvonne
    Cornelissen, Eric
    Sakellaris, Ioannis
    Saraga, Dikaia
    Hanninen, Otto
    Fernandes, Eduardo De Oliveira
    Ventura, Gabriela
    Wolkoff, Peder
    Carrer, Paolo
    Bartzis, John
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 579 : 169 - 178
  • [24] Indoor air quality in urban nurseries at Porto city: Particulate matter assessment
    Branco, P. T. B. S.
    Alvim-Ferraz, M. C. M.
    Martins, F. G.
    Sousa, S. I. V.
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 84 : 133 - 143
  • [25] Air quality inside subway metro indoor environment worldwide: A review
    Xu, Bin
    Hao, Jinliang
    ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 107 : 33 - 46
  • [26] Assessment of Ambient Air Quality Level at 21 sites in cement sector, Egypt
    Elawa, Omar
    Abdel-Latif, Nasser M.
    Galal, Tarek M.
    Farahat, Emad A.
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY, 2022, 65 (09): : 47 - 57
  • [27] Air Quality Assessment During COVID-19: A Case Study of Serbia
    Velickovic, Milica
    Ristic, Nevena
    Voza, Danijela
    CROATICA CHEMICA ACTA, 2022, 94 (03) : 158 - 165
  • [28] Assessment of air quality in Kolkata before and after COVID-19 lockdown
    Banerji, Suranjana
    Mitra, Deblina
    GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 37 (21) : 6351 - 6374
  • [29] Deep Learning-Based Indoor Air Quality Forecasting Framework for Indoor Subway Station Platforms
    Bakht, Ahtesham
    Sharma, Shambhavi
    Park, Duckshin
    Lee, Hyunsoo
    TOXICS, 2022, 10 (10)
  • [30] The effects of congestions tax on air quality and health
    Johansson, Christer
    Burman, Lars
    Forsberg, Bertil
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 43 (31) : 4843 - 4854