Comparison of Optimization Methods for the Attitude Control of Satellites

被引:0
作者
Albareda, Ramon [1 ]
Olfe, Karl Stephan [2 ]
Bello, Alvaro [2 ]
Fernandez, Jose Javier [2 ]
Lapuerta, Victoria [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Madrid, Escuela Tecn Super Ingn Aeronaut & Espacio, Plaza Cardenal Cisneros 3, Madrid 28040, Spain
[2] Univ Politecn Madrid, Escuela Tecn Super Ingn Aeronaut & Espacio, Ctr Computat Simulat, E USOC, Plaza Cardenal Cisneros 3, Madrid 28040, Spain
关键词
optimization; genetic algorithms; particle swarm optimization; fuzzy logic; attitude control; PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; CONVERGENCE; ALGORITHM; IDENTIFICATION; STABILITY;
D O I
10.3390/electronics13173363
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The definition of multiple operational modes in a satellite is of vital importance for the adaptation of the satellite to the operational demands of the mission and environmental conditions. In this work, three optimization methods were implemented for the initial calibration of an attitude controller based on fuzzy logic with the purpose of performing an initial exploration of optimal regions of the design space: a multi-objective genetic algorithm (GAMULTIOBJ), a particle swarm optimization (PSO), and a multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO). The performance of the optimizers was compared in terms of energy cost, accuracy, computational cost, and convergence capabilities of each algorithm. The results show that the PSO algorithm demonstrated superior computational efficiency compared to the others. Concerning the exploration of optimum regions, all algorithms exhibited similar exploratory capabilities. PSO's low computational cost allowed for thorough scanning of specific interest regions, making it ideal for detailed exploration, whereas MOPSO and GAMULTIOBJ provided more balanced performance with constrained Pareto front elements.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [21] Kubicka M, 2022, ELEKTROTECH INFORMAT, V139, P16, DOI 10.1007/s00502-022-00990-w
  • [22] Combining convergence and diversity in evolutionary multiobjective optimization
    Laumanns, M
    Thiele, L
    Deb, K
    Zitzler, E
    [J]. EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2002, 10 (03) : 263 - 282
  • [23] Application of particle swarm optimization to economic dispatch problem: Advantages and disadvantages
    Lee, Kwang Y.
    Park, Jong-Bae
    [J]. 2006 IEEE/PES POWER SYSTEMS CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION. VOLS 1-5, 2006, : 188 - +
  • [24] Liu M., 2009, P 2009 7 INT C INF C, P1
  • [25] Me J.-G., 2019, P EUR WORKSH ON BOAR
  • [26] Constraint-handling in nature-inspired numerical optimization: Past, present and future
    Mezura-Montes, Efren
    Coello Coello, Carlos A.
    [J]. SWARM AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2011, 1 (04) : 173 - 194
  • [27] State-of-the-Art Reviews of Meta-Heuristic Algorithms with Their Novel Proposal for Unconstrained Optimization and Applications
    Parouha, Raghav Prasad
    Verma, Pooja
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2021, 28 (05) : 4049 - 4115
  • [28] Pedersen M.E.H., 2010, Good Parameters Forparticle Swarm Optimization 2010
  • [29] Poli R., 2007, ANAL PUBLICATIONS PA
  • [30] Saadah A., 2024, J. Inf. Syst. Eng. Bus. Intell, V10, P290, DOI [10.20473/jisebi.10.2.290-301, DOI 10.20473/JISEBI.10.2.290-301]