Research on the Multi-Agent Evolutionary Game Behavior of Joint Operation between Coal Power Enterprises and New Energy Power Enterprises under Government Supervision

被引:0
作者
Chen, Jingxiao [1 ]
Zhang, Lei [1 ]
Deng, Gaodan [1 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Min & Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Xuzhou 221116, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
coal power enterprise (CPE); new energy power enterprise (NEPE); joint operation; government; evolutionary game; TAX;
D O I
10.3390/en17184553
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Based on the perspective of joint operation between coal power enterprises and new energy power enterprises (JOCN), this paper constructs an evolutionary game model among coal power enterprises (CPEs), new energy power enterprises (NEPEs) and the government, and analyzes the influencing factors of the final strategy choices of various subjects through evolutionary simulation. The results show that: (1) The game among CPEs, NEPEs and the government in JOCN is a win-win game. (2) The probability of CPEs choosing to participate in the joint operation is positively correlated with additional operating income, government subsidies and environmental costs in coal power generation, while negatively correlated with additional operating costs and spillover effects. (3) The probability of NEPEs choosing to participate in the joint operation is positively correlated with additional operating income, government subsidies and the cost of power loss in new energy power generation, while negatively correlated with additional operating costs and spillover effects. (4) The probability of the government choosing to support joint operation is positively correlated with social welfare, and negatively correlated with the cost of governmental strict supervision. The research results can provide theoretical reference for enterprises and the government in the future transformations and policy formulation.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] [柴瑞瑞 Chai Ruirui], 2022, [系统工程理论与实践, Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice], V42, P184
  • [2] Ding L.L., 2023, J. Manag. Eng, V38, P239
  • [3] Fang F., 2015, EC RES J, V6, P147, DOI [DOI 10.19581/J.CNKI.CIEJOURNAL.2022.07.013, 10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2022.07.013]
  • [4] Combining Policies for Renewable Energy: Is the Whole Less Than the Sum of Its Parts?
    Fischer, Carolyn
    Preonas, Louis
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2010, 4 (01): : 51 - 92
  • [5] Guttman J. M., 2000, EUR J POLIT ECON, V16, P31, DOI [10.1016/s0176-2680(99)00046-4, DOI 10.1016/S0176-2680(99)00046-4]
  • [6] FEDERAL-TAX EFFECTS ON THE FINANCIAL ATTRACTIVENESS OF RENEWABLE VERSUS CONVENTIONAL POWER-PLANTS
    HILL, LJ
    HADLEY, SW
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 1995, 23 (07) : 593 - 597
  • [7] Huang KaiNan, 2009, EC RES J, P154
  • [8] [焦建玲 Jiao Jianling], 2017, [中国管理科学, Chinese Journal of Management Science], V25, P140
  • [9] Analysis of the joint trading of local green power certificates, carbon emissions rights, and electricity considering demand flexibility
    Li, Jifeng
    He, Xingtang
    Niu, Wei
    Liu, Xiangning
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2024, 155
  • [10] [李艳梅 Li Yanmei], 2024, [中国环境科学, China Environmental Science], V44, P567