Learning argumentation frameworks from labelings

被引:1
|
作者
Bengel, Lars [1 ]
Thimm, Matthias [1 ]
Rienstra, Tjitze [2 ]
机构
[1] Fernuniv, Artificial Intelligence Grp, Hagen, Germany
[2] Maastricht Univ, Dept Data Sci & Knowledge Engn, Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
Abstract argumentation; labelings; semantics; learning; ACCEPTABILITY; SEMANTICS;
D O I
10.3233/AAC-220018
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
We consider the problem of learning argumentation frameworks from a given set of labelings such that every input is a s-labeling of these argumentation frameworks. Our new algorithm takes labelings and computes attack constraints for each argument that represent the restrictions on argumentation frameworks that are consistent with the input labelings. Having constraints on the level of arguments allows for a very effective parallelization of all computations. An important element of this approach is maintaining a representation of all argumentation frameworks that satisfy the input labelings instead of simply finding any suitable argumentation framework. This is especially important, for example, if we receive additional labelings at a later time and want to refine our result without having to start all over again. The developed algorithm is compared to previous works and an evaluation of its performance has been conducted.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 159
页数:39
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Boolean model for conflict-freeness in argumentation frameworks
    Wu, Jiachao
    AIMS MATHEMATICS, 2023, 8 (02): : 3913 - 3919
  • [22] An Infinite-Valued Grounded Labelling for Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
    Alcantara, Joao
    Sa, Samy
    33RD ANNUAL ACM SYMPOSIUM ON APPLIED COMPUTING, 2018, : 903 - 910
  • [23] Argumentation Frameworks with Recursive Attacks and Evidence-Based Supports
    Cayrol, Claudette
    Fandinno, Jorge
    del Cerro, Luis Farinas
    Lagasquie-Schiex, Marie-Christine
    FOUNDATIONS OF INFORMATION AND KNOWLEDGE SYSTEMS, FOIKS 2018, 2018, 10833 : 150 - 169
  • [24] Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks with a dual relation between defeat and defence
    Alcantara, Joao
    Cordeiro, Renan
    JOURNAL OF LOGIC AND COMPUTATION, 2024,
  • [25] An Efficient Algorithm for Skeptical Preferred Acceptance in Dynamic Argumentation Frameworks
    Alfano, Gianvincenzo
    Greco, Sergio
    Parisi, Francesco
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-EIGHTH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2019, : 18 - 24
  • [26] Abstract Argumentation Frameworks with Fallible Evidence
    Skiba, Kenneth
    Thimm, Matthias
    Cohen, Andrea
    Gottifredi, Sebastian
    Garcia, Alejandro J.
    COMPUTATIONAL MODELS OF ARGUMENT (COMMA 2020), 2020, 326 : 347 - 354
  • [27] Introducing General Argumentation Frameworks and Their Use
    Ferilli, Stefano
    AIXIA 2020 - ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2021, 12414 : 136 - 153
  • [28] On acceptance conditions in abstract argumentation frameworks
    Alfano, Gianvincenzo
    Greco, Sergio
    Parisi, Francesco
    Trubitsyna, Irina
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2023, 625 : 757 - 779
  • [29] Interlinking Logic Programs and Argumentation Frameworks
    Sakama, Chiaki
    Son, Tran Cao
    LOGIC PROGRAMMING AND NONMONOTONIC REASONING, LPNMR 2022, 2022, 13416 : 322 - 335
  • [30] Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
    Modgil, Sanjay
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2009, 173 (9-10) : 901 - 934