Extended Prophylactic Antibiotics for Primary and Aseptic Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis

被引:3
|
作者
Dasari, Suhas P. [1 ]
Kanumuri, Sanjana D. [1 ]
Yang, JaeWon [1 ]
Manner, Paul A. [1 ]
Fernando, Navin D. [1 ]
Hernandez, Nicholas M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
extended antibiotic prophylaxis; periprosthetic joint infection; PJI; antibiotic prophylaxis; antibiotic duration; TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; HIGH-RISK PATIENTS; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; ORAL ANTIBIOTICS; INFECTION; MANAGEMENT; BURDEN; RATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2024.01.014
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: There is growing interest in extended antibiotic prophylaxis (EAP) following total joint arthroplasty (TJA); however, the benefit of EAP remains controversial. For this investigation, both oral and intravenous antibiotic protocols were included in the EAP group. Methods: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Ovid Embase, Elton B. Stephens CO, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature were queried for literature comparing outcomes of primary and aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients who were treated with either <24 hours of postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis (standard of care [SoC]) or >24 hours of EAP. The primary outcome was periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). A pooled relative-risk random-effects MantelHaenszel model was implemented to compare cohorts. Results: There were 18 studies with a total of 19,153 patients included. There was considerable variation in antibiotic prophylaxis protocols with first-generation cephalosporins being the most commonly implemented antibiotic for both groups. Patients treated with EAP were 35% less likely to develop PJI relative to the SoC (P = .0004). When examining primary TJA, patients treated with EAP were 39% and 40% less likely to develop a PJI for TJA (P = .0008) and THA (P = .02), respectively. There was no significant difference for primary TKA (P = .17). When examining aseptic revision TJA, EAP led to a 36% and 47% reduction in the probability of a PJI for aseptic revision TJA (P = .007) and aseptic revision TKA (P = .008), respectively; there was no observed benefit for aseptic revision THA (P = .36). Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrated that patients treated with EAP were less likely to develop a PJI relative to those treated with the SoC for all TJA, primary TJA, primary THA, aseptic revision TJA, and aseptic revision TKA. There was no significant difference observed between EAP and SoC for primary TKA or aseptic revision THA. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:S476 / S487
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Do Extended Oral Postoperative Antibiotics Prevent Early Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Morbidly Obese Patients Undergoing Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty?
    Carender, Christopher N.
    DeMik, David E.
    Glass, Natalie A.
    Noiseux, Nicolas O.
    Brown, Timothy S.
    Bedard, Nicholas A.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2021, 36 (08) : 2716 - 2721
  • [22] The Efficacy and Safety of Corticosteroids in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Direct Meta-Analysis
    Hannon, Charles P.
    Fillingham, Yale A.
    Mason, J. Bohannon
    Sterling, Robert S.
    Casambre, Francisco D.
    Verity, Tyler J.
    Woznica, Anne
    Nelson, Nicole
    Hamilton, William G.
    Valle, Craig J. Della
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2022, 37 (10) : 1898 - +
  • [23] Risk Factors for Total Hip Arthroplasty Aseptic Revision
    Khatod, Monti
    Cafri, Guy
    Namba, Robert S.
    Inacio, Maria C. S.
    Paxton, Elizabeth W.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2014, 29 (07) : 1412 - 1417
  • [24] Is There a Role for Extended Postoperative Oral Antibiotics in Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty High-Risk Individuals After Surgery for Periprosthetic Joint Infection?
    Higuera, Carlos A.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2022, 37 (08) : 1441 - 1442
  • [25] Irrigation Solutions and Antibiotic Powders: Should I Use Them in Primary and Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty?
    Springer, Bryan D.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2022, 37 (08) : 1438 - 1440
  • [26] Comparative reinfection rate of one-stage versus two-stage revision in the management of periprosthetic joint infection following total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis
    Qin, Yueying
    Liu, Zeshou
    Li, Liwen
    Yang, Yuxing
    Huang, Xiaomeng
    Liang, Weiming
    Lin, Longbao
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [27] Utility of histopathological examination in aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty: a preliminary analysis
    Rossmann, Markus
    Aljawabra, Alaa
    Mau, Hans
    Citak, Mustafa
    Gehrke, Thorsten
    Klatte, Till Orla
    Abdelaziz, Hussein
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 34 (02) : 201 - 206
  • [28] Clinical Outcomes and Costs Within 90 Days of Primary or Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty
    Nichols, Christine I.
    Vose, Joshua G.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2016, 31 (07) : 1400 - +
  • [29] Clinical and Functional Outcomes of Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy in 2-Stage Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Almaslmani, Saud
    Entezari, Bahar
    Safir, Oleg A.
    Gross, Allan E.
    Kuzyk, Paul R.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2023, 38 (09) : 1900 - 1907
  • [30] Unexpected Positive Cultures in Presumed Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Incidence, Risk Factors, Management, and Outcomes
    Mirghaderi, Peyman
    Esmaeili, Sina
    Pouramini, Alireza
    Azarboo, Alireza
    Ghaseminejad-Raeini, Amirhossein
    JBJS REVIEWS, 2024, 12 (11)