Pressurized Regenerative Calcium Cycle for Utility-Scale Energy Storage: A Techno-Economic Assessment

被引:0
|
作者
Moghtaderi, Behdad [1 ]
Tremain, Priscilla [1 ]
Warner, John [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Newcastle, Ctr Innovat Energy Technol, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
[2] Jord Int Pty Ltd, St Leonards, NSW 2065, Australia
关键词
pressurized regenerative calcium cycle (PRC2); carbonation/calcination reaction (carbal); calcium looping; thermochemical energy storage; utility-scale energy storage; CO2; CAO; DECOMPOSITION; CARBONATION; INTEGRATION; SORBENT; SYSTEM; STEAM;
D O I
10.3390/pr12081778
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
The University of Newcastle (UON) and Jord International Pty Ltd. (Jord) have jointly developed a novel concept for the storage of energy from renewable and fossil fuel sources. The process, referred to as the pressurized regenerative calcium cycle (PRC2), relies on cyclic carbonation and calcination of CaO/CaCO3, in which low-cost electrical energy (i.e., off-peak, or excess generation from renewables) drives the calcination reaction and electricity is generated as required through the carbonation reaction. Initial proof-of-concept testing of the process was previously conducted within an existing fluid bed reactor at UON. The PRC2 concept was successfully demonstrated by maintaining the fluid bed reactor at a constant temperature by using the heat released during the reaction of calcium oxide and carbon dioxide. Following proof-of-concept testing, further refinement of the PRC2 process, which is the subject of this paper, was conducted to address its shortcomings and, importantly, facilitate the detailed design, construction, and operation of a large-scale demonstration plant. Nine different configurations were examined for the PRC2 process, for each of which a combined experimental, process modelling, and techno-economic assessment was completed. Experimental investigations were conducted to determine the suitability of carbonate materials for the PRC2 process. Process modelling and levelized cost of storage (LCOS) calculations were concurrently conducted and revealed that the molten salt approach (Option 9) was the most promising, having superior round-trip efficiency and lowest LCOS. For practical reasons (e.g., technical difficulties of working with molten salts), Option 3 (indirect power generation using a fluid bed reactor) was deemed the most feasible option for a demonstration scale plant. The LCOS for Option 3 (assuming a 100 MWe capacity) was calculated to be AUD 245 per MWh, which is on par with the cost of batteries for peak power replacement applications (the cost associated with lithium-ion batteries is AUD 370 per MWh).
引用
收藏
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The development of techno-economic models for large-scale energy storage systems
    Kapila, Sahil
    Oni, Abayomi Olufemi
    Kumar, Amit
    ENERGY, 2017, 140 : 656 - 672
  • [22] Techno-economic modelling of large scale compressed air energy storage systems
    Huang, Y.
    Chen, H. S.
    Zhang, X. J.
    Keatley, P.
    Huang, M. J.
    Vorushylo, I.
    Wang, Y. D.
    Hewitt, N. J.
    8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED ENERGY (ICAE2016), 2017, 105
  • [23] Techno-economic and environmental analysis of utility-scale hybrid renewable energy system integrating waste-to-energy plant to complement an unreliable grid operation
    Usman Alhaji Dodo
    Evans Chinemezu Ashigwuike
    Energy, Ecology and Environment, 2023, 8 : 439 - 456
  • [24] Techno-Economic Assessment of Residential Heat Pump Integrated with Thermal Energy Storage
    Sultan, Sara
    Hirschey, Jason
    Kumar, Navin
    Cui, Borui
    Liu, Xiaobing
    LaClair, Tim J.
    Gluesenkamp, Kyle R.
    ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (10)
  • [25] Techno-economic assessment of a subsea energy storage technology for power balancing services
    Hahn, Henning
    Hau, Daniel
    Dick, Christian
    Puchta, Matthias
    ENERGY, 2017, 133 : 121 - 127
  • [26] Utility-Scale Energy Storage Systems: Converters and Control
    Stynski, Sebastian
    Luo, Wensheng
    Chub, Andrii
    Franquelo, Leopoldo G.
    Malinowski, Mariusz
    Vinnikov, Dmitri
    IEEE INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS MAGAZINE, 2020, 14 (04) : 32 - 52
  • [27] A techno-economic evaluation of utility scale solar power generation
    Mechanical Engineering Department, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
    不详
    不详
    Energy,
  • [28] A techno-economic evaluation of utility scale solar power generation
    Shakeel, Mohammad Raghib
    Mokheimer, Esmail M. A.
    ENERGY, 2022, 261
  • [29] Techno-economic assessment of energy storage systems using annualized life cycle cost of storage (LCCOS) and levelized cost of energy (LCOE) metrics
    Mostafa, Mostafa H.
    Aleem, Shady H. E. Abdel
    Ali, Samia G.
    Ali, Ziad M.
    Abdelaziz, Almoataz Y.
    JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE, 2020, 29
  • [30] Techno-Economic and Life Cycle Analysis for Energy Technologies
    Uhlrich, John
    ENERGY TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 8 (11)