A multi-level approach to travel mode choice - How person characteristics and situation specific aspects determine car use in a student sample

被引:155
作者
Klockner, Christian A. [1 ]
Friedrichsmeier, Thomas [2 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, NTNU, Inst Psychol, Sect Risk Psychol Environm & Safety RIPENSA, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway
[2] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Dept Psychol, Workgrp Environm & Cognit Psychol, Bochum, Germany
关键词
Travel mode choice; Two-level structural equation model; Situational influence; Person attributes; PAST BEHAVIOR; HABIT; NORMS; TRANSPORTATION; INTENTION; IMPACT; LIFE;
D O I
10.1016/j.trf.2011.01.006
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The presented study analyses travel mode choice in a student sample on four frequent trips: To the university, to work, to the favourite leisure activity, and to the favourite shop. The decision to use the car in contrast to alternative travel modes is modelled for each individual trip using a two-level structural equation model with trip specific attributes on Level 1 and person specific attributes on Level 2. Data was gathered in an online travel survey on a student sample of the Ruhr-University in Bochum. Three thousand five hundred and sixty students reported their mode choice for 26,865 individual trips. On the person level a comprehensive action determination model was applied to explain variation in person specific car preference, whereas on the situation level car availability, trip duration, day of travel, disruption in public transportation, weather, daylight, and purpose of the trip were included as predictors. The proposed two-level model is supported by the data. Level 1 predictors explain 62% of Level 1 variation, the Level 2 model explains 48% of Level 2 variance. The intraclass-correlation of car preference is .535. In a final step, interactions between person and trip specific variables were explored. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:261 / 277
页数:17
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Habit and information use in travel mode choices [J].
Aarts, H ;
Verplanken, B ;
vanKnippenberg, A .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1997, 96 (1-2) :1-14
[2]  
Ajzen I, 2005, HANDBOOK OF ATTITUDES, P173
[3]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[4]  
Al Hassan Y., 1999, J TRANSP GEOGR, V7, P209, DOI [10.1016/S0966-6923, DOI 10.1016/S0966-6923, DOI 10.1016/S0966-6923(98)00047-7]
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Mplus technical appendices
[6]   Changing travel-mode choice as rational choice: Results from a longitudinal intervention study [J].
Bamberg, S ;
Schmidt, P .
RATIONALITY AND SOCIETY, 1998, 10 (02) :223-252
[7]   Social context, personal norms and the use of public transportation:: Two field studies [J].
Bamberg, Sebastian ;
Hunecke, Marcel ;
Bloebaum, Anke .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 27 (03) :190-203
[8]   Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera:: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour [J].
Bamberg, Sebastian ;
Moeser, Guido .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 27 (01) :14-25
[9]  
Ben A., 1995, INT J RES MARK, V12, P9, DOI DOI 10.1016/0167-8116(95)00002-J
[10]   A multi-level cross-classified model for discrete response variables [J].
Bhat, CR .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2000, 34 (07) :567-582