Teachers' non-response bias in questionnaires about their attitude towards inclusive education

被引:1
作者
Guillemot, Francoise [1 ,2 ]
Lacroix, Florence [1 ]
Nocus, Isabelle [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Nantes Univ, Ctr Rech Educ Nantes, Nantes, France
[2] Nantes Univ, Lab psychol Pays Loire, LPPL, UR 4638, Nantes, France
来源
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL NEEDS | 2024年
关键词
attitude; inclusive education; non-response bias; teacher; PRESERVICE TEACHERS; PREDICTING NONRESPONSE; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY; RESPONSE RATE; EFFICACY; INTENTIONS; STUDENT; RATINGS; PARENT;
D O I
10.1111/1471-3802.12726
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
The attitude of teachers towards inclusive education is a key issue for the success of inclusive education. Many studies have been designed to assess teachers' attitudes, but none have looked at the bias caused by teachers' non-response to questionnaires on their attitudes. Non-response biases are difficult to identify because it is impossible to access the responses of individuals who do not wish to reply. It is therefore necessary to use other data. This article examines the non-response biases of teachers in questionnaires about their attitude towards inclusive education by cross-checking the responses of parents of children with a disability (N = 382) regarding the quality of their child's inclusion and the responses or non-responses of teachers to questionnaires about their attitude (N = 48 responses). This study shows that the non-responses of teachers are not random and are associated with poorer well-being and social inclusion at school, a lower sense of belonging and higher levels of bullying. This significant non-response bias of teachers leads us to question the existence of a potential positivity bias in previous studies.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [11] European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education, 2011, Key principles for promoting quality in inclusive education-Recommendations for practice
  • [12] Teachers' attitudes towards inclusive education: a critical review of published questionnaires
    Ewing, Donna L.
    Monsen, Jeremy J.
    Kielblock, Stephan
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY IN PRACTICE, 2018, 34 (02) : 150 - 165
  • [13] GOODENOW C, 1993, PSYCHOL SCHOOLS, V30, P79, DOI 10.1002/1520-6807(199301)30:1<79::AID-PITS2310300113>3.0.CO
  • [14] 2-X
  • [15] Gregory J., 2018, Cogent Education, V5, P1, DOI DOI 10.1080/2331186X.2017.1422679
  • [16] Validation of the student version of the Perceptions of Inclusion Questionnaire on a sample of French students
    Guillemot, Francoise
    Hessels, Marco G. P.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SPECIAL NEEDS EDUCATION, 2022, 37 (05) : 850 - 865
  • [17] Hobbs T., 1998, TEACH EXCEPT CHILD, V31, P12, DOI [10.1177/004005999803100102, DOI 10.1177/004005999803100102]
  • [18] Parent involvement in school conceptualizing multiple dimensions and their relations with family and demographic risk factors
    Kohl, GO
    Lengua, LJ
    McMahon, RJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 38 (06) : 501 - 523
  • [19] Pre- and In-Service Teachers' Attitudes Toward Students With Learning Difficulties and Challenging Behavior
    Krischler, Mireille
    Pit-ten Cate, Ineke M.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 10
  • [20] The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria - What did they really say?
    Lance, CE
    Butts, MM
    Michels, LC
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2006, 9 (02) : 202 - 220