Risk factors for and prognostic impact of lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis in patients with rectal neuroendocrine tumors: a single-center retrospective analysis of 214 cases with radical resection

被引:0
作者
Sakurai, Tsubasa [1 ]
Hiyoshi, Y. [1 ]
Daitoku, N. [1 ]
Matsui, S. [1 ]
Mukai, T. [1 ]
Nagasaki, T. [1 ]
Yamaguchi, T. [1 ]
Akiyoshi, T. [1 ]
Kawachi, H. [2 ]
Fukunaga, Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Canc Inst Hosp Japanese Fdn Canc Res, Gastroenterol Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol Surg, 3-8-31 Ariake,Koto Ku, Tokyo 1358550, Japan
[2] Canc Inst Hosp Japanese Fdn Canc Res, Dept Pathol, 3-8-31 Ariake,Koto Ku, Tokyo 1358550, Japan
关键词
Rectal neuroendocrine tumors; Lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis; Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection; Short-term outcomes; Long-term outcomes; ENETS CONSENSUS GUIDELINES; CLINICOPATHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS; CANCER; MANAGEMENT; DISSECTION;
D O I
10.1007/s00595-024-02905-y
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
PurposeLateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) metastasis of rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) is rare, with unknown oncological features. We investigated the oncological impact of LPLN metastasis in patients with rectal NETs.MethodsThis study included 214 patients with rectal NETs who underwent curative surgery. We evaluated their clinicopathological characteristics and short- and long-term outcomes.ResultsLPLN dissection was performed in 15 patients with LPLN swelling >= 7 mm (preoperative imaging); 12 patients had LPLN metastases, 6 of whom had LPLN metastases without mesorectal lymph node metastases (skip metastasis). The short-term outcomes were similar between the groups with and without LPLN dissection. The median follow-up period was 59.4 months, and patients with LPLN metastasis showed significantly shorter disease-free and overall survival rates than those without metastasis. Among 199 patients who did not undergo LPLN dissection, only 1 had LPLN recurrence. In a univariate analysis, tumor depth, tumor grade, and LPLN metastasis were associated with the overall survival. In the multivariate analysis, only LPLN metastasis was an independent predictor of the overall survival.ConclusionsLPLN metastasis is a poor prognostic factor for patients with rectal NETs. LPLN enlargement can be considered an indication for dissection, owing to its high rate of metastasis and associated poor prognosis.
引用
收藏
页码:144 / 153
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Rectal Cancer: A Single-Center Experience and Literature Review
    Kim, Min Chul
    Oh, Jae Hwan
    ANNALS OF COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2021, 37 (06) : 382 - 394
  • [22] Analysis of risk factors of lymph node metastasis in rectal neuroendocrine neoplasms using multicenter data
    Wei, Gengzhou
    Feng, Xingyu
    Wang, Wei
    Zhang, Yu
    Zeng, Yujie
    Chen, Minhu
    Chen, Ye
    Chen, Jie
    Zhou, Zhiwei
    Li, Yong
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2018, 14 (18) : 1817 - 1823
  • [23] Difference in prognostic impact of lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis between pre- and post-neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer patients
    Lim, Byeo Lee
    Park, In Ja
    Kim, Young Il
    Kim, Chan Wook
    Lee, Jong Lyul
    Yoon, Yong Sik
    Lim, Seok-Byung
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT AND RESEARCH, 2023, 104 (04) : 205 - 213
  • [24] RISK FACTORS FOR CENTRAL LYMPH NODE METASTASIS IN PAPILLARY THYROID MICROCARCINOMA - A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF 1433 CASES FROM A SINGLE CENTER
    SHen, YaoYuan
    Pu, WenJing
    ZHou, Hongrun
    Cui, Mei
    ZHao, Wei
    Ma, Jin
    Wang, CHun
    Sun, ZHenZHu
    POLISH JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2022, 73 (03) : 191 - 197
  • [25] Incidence of and risk factors for lymphocele formation after lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for rectal cancer: a retrospective study
    Ochiai, K.
    Kaneko, M.
    Nozawa, H.
    Kawai, K.
    Hata, K.
    Tanaka, T.
    Nishikawa, T.
    Shuno, Y.
    Sasaki, K.
    Hiyoshi, M.
    Emoto, S.
    Murono, K.
    Sonoda, H.
    Ishihara, S.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2020, 22 (02) : 161 - 169
  • [26] Establishing and validating predictive nomograms for lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis in patients with rectal cancer based on radiologic factors and clinicopathologic characteristics
    Zhou, Sicheng
    Yang, Yingchi
    Lou, Zheng
    Liang, Jianwei
    Wang, Xin
    Tang, Jianqiang
    Liu, Qian
    EJSO, 2023, 49 (04): : 747 - 754
  • [27] Effective dissecting range and prognostic significance of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for middle-low rectal cancer patients with lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis: Results of a large multicenter lateral node collaborative group in China
    Zhou, Sicheng
    Tang, Jianqiang
    Liang, Jianwei
    Lou, Zheng
    Fu, Wei
    Feng, Bo
    Yang, Yingchi
    Xiao, Yi
    Liu, Qian
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [28] Predictive factors of pathological lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis in patients without clinical lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis (clinical stage II/III): The analysis of data from the clinical trial (JCOG0212)
    Komori, Koji
    Fujita, Shin
    Mizusawa, Junki
    Kanemitsu, Yukihide
    Ito, Masaaki
    Shiomi, Akio
    Ohue, Masayuki
    Ota, Mitsuyoshi
    Akazai, Yoshihiro
    Shiozawa, Manabu
    Yamaguchi, Takashi
    Bandou, Hiroyuki
    Katsumata, Kenji
    Kinugasa, Yusuke
    Takii, Yasumasa
    Akasu, Takayuki
    Moriya, Yoshihiro
    EJSO, 2019, 45 (03): : 336 - 340
  • [29] Development of symptomatic lymphoceles after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection is independent of surgical approach: a single-center analysis
    Thomas, Christian
    Ziewers, Stefanie
    Thomas, Anita
    Dotzauer, Robert
    Bartsch, Georg
    Haferkamp, Axel
    Tsaur, Igor
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2019, 51 (04) : 633 - 640
  • [30] Occult lymph node metastasis in patients with laryngeal cancer and relevant predicting factors: a single-center experience
    Bayir, Omer
    Toptas, Gokhan
    Saylam, Guleser
    Izgi, Turan Canmurat
    Han, Unsal
    Keseroglu, Kemal
    Akyildiz, Ilker
    Korkmaz, Mehmet Hakan
    TUMORI JOURNAL, 2022, 108 (05): : 439 - 449