Deep learning algorithm for predicting left ventricular systolic dysfunction in atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response

被引:1
作者
Jeong, Joo Hee [1 ]
Kang, Sora [2 ]
Lee, Hak Seung [2 ]
Lee, Min Sung [2 ]
Son, Jeong Min [2 ]
Kwon, Joon-myung [2 ]
Lee, Hyoung Seok [1 ]
Choi, Yun Young [1 ]
Kim, So Ree [1 ]
Cho, Dong-Hyuk [1 ]
Kim, Yun Gi [1 ]
Kim, Mi-Na [1 ]
Shim, Jaemin [1 ]
Park, Seong-Mi [1 ]
Kim, Young-Hoon [1 ]
Choi, Jong-Il [1 ]
机构
[1] Korea Univ, Anam Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Internal Med,Div Cardiol, 73 Goryeodae Ro, Seoul 02841, South Korea
[2] Med AI Co, Med Res Team, Seoul, South Korea
来源
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL - DIGITAL HEALTH | 2024年 / 5卷 / 06期
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Deep learning; Left ventricular ejection fraction; Atrial fibrillation; Rate control; DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ASSOCIATION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1093/ehjdh/ztae062
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims Although evaluation of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is crucial for deciding the rate control strategy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), real-time assessment of LVEF is limited in outpatient settings. We aimed to investigate the performance of artificial intelligence-based algorithms in predicting LV systolic dysfunction (LVSD) in patients with AF and rapid ventricular response (RVR).Methods and results This study is an external validation of a pre-existing deep learning algorithm based on residual neural network architecture. Data were obtained from a prospective cohort of AF with RVR at a single centre between 2018 and 2023. Primary outcome was the detection of LVSD, defined as a LVEF <= 40%, assessed using 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG). Secondary outcome involved predicting LVSD using 1-lead ECG (Lead I). Among 423 patients, 241 with available echocardiography data within 2 months were evaluated, of whom 54 (22.4%) were confirmed to have LVSD. Deep learning algorithm demonstrated fair performance in predicting LVSD [area under the curve (AUC) 0.78]. Negative predictive value for excluding LVSD was 0.88. Deep learning algorithm resulted competent performance in predicting LVSD compared with N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (AUC 0.78 vs. 0.70, P = 0.12). Predictive performance of the deep learning algorithm was lower in Lead I (AUC 0.68); however, negative predictive value remained consistent (0.88).Conclusion Deep learning algorithm demonstrated competent performance in predicting LVSD in patients with AF and RVR. In outpatient setting, use of artificial intelligence-based algorithm may facilitate prediction of LVSD and earlier choice of drug, enabling better symptom control in AF patients with RVR. Graphical Abstract ECG, electrocardiography; LV, left ventricular; AF, atrial fibrillation; RVR, rapid ventricular response; LVSD; left ventricular systolic dysfunction; AUROC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.
引用
收藏
页码:683 / 691
页数:9
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [21] Van Gelder IC, 2010, NEW ENGL J MED, V362, P1363, DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa1001337
  • [22] Importance of external validation and subgroup analysis of artificial intelligence in the detection of low ejection fraction from electrocardiograms
    Yagi, Ryuichiro
    Goto, Shinichi
    Katsumata, Yoshinori
    MacRae, Calum A.
    Deo, Rahul C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL - DIGITAL HEALTH, 2022, 3 (04): : 654 - 657