Introduction to the Special Issue on "Building Institutions for Priority Setting in Health"

被引:2
作者
Fan, Victoria Y. [1 ,2 ]
Guzman, Javier [1 ]
Baker, Pete [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Global Dev, Washington, DC 20036 USA
[2] Univ Hawaii Manoa, Coll Social Sci, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
关键词
Health technology assessment; institutions; organizations; priority setting; public agencies; TECHNOLOGY-ASSESSMENT;
D O I
10.1080/23288604.2024.2377891
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
In the pursuit of universal health coverage, countries are invariably confronted with questions about which services to pay with public funds, to whom, and at what cost. Such priority-setting processes have major ramifications for the costs and benefits of care delivered. These processes are not just technical, but also highly political and organizational in nature and expressions of social values. This special issue focuses on building institutions for priority setting in health. These institutions serve a public purpose and are primarily concerned with conducting or using health technology assessment (HTA) to inform resource allocation decisions. We first define the concept of institutions for priority setting in health and the methodological considerations of assessing and evaluating these institutions. Next, we present key common themes and summarize key messages across the articles, including lessons learned and future challenges in building these institutions.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   International Partnerships to Develop Evidence-informed Priority Setting Institutions: Ten Years of Experience from the International Decision Support Initiative (iDSI) [J].
Baker, Peter ;
Barasa, Edwine ;
Chalkidou, Kalipso ;
Chola, Lumbwe ;
Culyer, Anthony ;
Dabak, Saudamini ;
Fan, Victoria Y. ;
Fronsdal, Katrine ;
Heupink, Lieke Fleur ;
Isaranuwatchai, Wanrudee ;
Mbau, Rahab ;
Mehndiratta, Abha ;
Nonvignon, Justice ;
Ruiz, Francis ;
Teerawattananon, Yot ;
Vassall, Anna ;
Guzman, Javier .
HEALTH SYSTEMS & REFORM, 2023, 9 (03)
[2]  
Bell K., 2013, Open Educ Sociol Dict
[3]  
Boin A., 2021, Guardians of public value: how public organisations become and remain institutions, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-51701-4, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-51701-4]
[4]   Health Technology Assessment in Taiwan: Reflections of the Last Twenty Years [J].
Chen, Shih-Chung .
HEALTH SYSTEMS & REFORM, 2023, 9 (03)
[5]  
Definition of agency, 2024, Cambridge dictionary
[6]   Organizational Formation for Priority Setting: Historical Perspectives and Thematic Analysis of India's Health Technology Assessment Agency [J].
Fan, Victoria Y. ;
Mehndiratta, Abha ;
Ahazie, Jubilee ;
Guzman, Javier ;
Prinja, Shankar ;
Sundararaman, T. ;
Swaminathan, Soumya .
HEALTH SYSTEMS & REFORM, 2023, 9 (03)
[7]   Harnessing Health Technology Assessment in Latin America and the Caribbean: Keeping the Region on Course [J].
Giedion, Ursula ;
Espinoza, Manuel Antonio ;
Gongora-Salazar, Pamela ;
Mehndiratta, Abha ;
Ollendorff, Dan .
HEALTH SYSTEMS & REFORM, 2023, 9 (03)
[8]  
Grieve E., 2024, Estimating the return on investment of health technology assessment India (HTAIn)
[9]   Health Technology Assessment in China's Health Care Sector: Development and Applications [J].
Guo, Wudong ;
Wang, Peimeng ;
Zhang, Yuzheng ;
Li, Xue ;
Wang, Yaoling ;
Zhao, Kun ;
Ruiz, Francis ;
Li, Rui ;
Xiao, Feiyi ;
Gu, Xuefei ;
You, Mao ;
Fu, Qiang .
HEALTH SYSTEMS & REFORM, 2023, 9 (03)
[10]  
inahta, 2024, The International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment INAHTA