The Impact of Argument-Based Inquiry Approach on Elementary School Students' Critical Thinking in Elementary School Science Class

被引:0
作者
Park, Jiaeng [1 ]
Nam, Jeonghee [1 ]
机构
[1] Pusan Natl Univ, Dept Chem Educ, Pusan 46241, South Korea
来源
JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY-DAEHAN HWAHAK HOE JEE | 2024年 / 68卷 / 04期
关键词
Elementary school science class; Argument-based inquiry; Critical thinking; MIDDLE; SKILLS; LEARN; WRITE;
D O I
10.5012/jkcs.2024.68.4.221
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of Argument-based Inquiry approach on elementary school students' critical thinking in elementary school science class. For this purpose, 23 students from two 5th grade elementary school classes in a metropolitan city were selected. One class (11 students) was assigned as the experimental group which Argument-based inquiry approach on 10 topics were applied. To determine the impact of Argument-based Inquiry approach on critical thinking, we analyzed the results of critical thinking tests before and after class and recordings of the discussion process of students in the experimental group. As a result of the critical thinking analysis, the average score of the experimental group in the deduction section was statistically and significantly higher than that of the comparative group. And as a result of analysis of recordings of the discussion process, students used deductive reasoning more often than inductive reasoning, and their use of this reasoning increased significantly at the claim<middle dot>evidence stage.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 234
页数:14
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1964, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
[2]  
Bailin S., 2002, Science education, V11, P361, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1016042608621
[3]   In Pursuit of Consensus: Disagreement and legitimization during small-group argumentation [J].
Berland, Leema K. ;
Lee, Victor R. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2012, 34 (12) :1857-1882
[4]  
Boostrom R., 1992, Developing creative and critical thinking: An integrated approach
[5]  
Brown J., 2000, Pupils and Learning, Psychology of Education: Major Themes
[6]  
Browne N.M., 2000, TEACH HIGH EDUC, V5, P301, DOI DOI 10.1080/713699143
[7]  
Cho H., 2014, Doctoral Thesis
[8]   Assessing dialogic argumentation in online environments to relate structure, grounds, and conceptual quality [J].
Clark, Douglas B. ;
Sampson, Victor .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 2008, 45 (03) :293-321
[9]  
Copi I., 2014, Introduction to logic, V14th
[10]  
Demir S., 2015, Journal of Education and Practice, V6, P157