Effects of the Beijing genotype on latent tuberculosis infection, TB disease risk, and clustering of TB cases

Background: The Beijing genotype of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) has sparked debate regarding its virulence and transmissibility. This study contributes to this discussion by assessing its effect on the risk of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI), active tuberculosis (TB) disease among contacts, and clustering of known TB cases. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the records of 4457 culture-confirmed TB patients and their contacts (20,448) reported to the Florida Department of Health between 2009 and 2023. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate the effect of the Beijing strain on LTBI, active TB risk among contacts, and case clustering. Results: Our study revealed no significant difference in transmissibility between the Beijing and non-Beijing genotypes among contacts. LTBI prevalence was 19.9%, slightly higher in non-Beijing than Beijing genotypes (20.2% vs. 15.5%, p < 0.001). The prevalence of active TB was 1.8%, with no significant difference between the Beijing and non-Beijing genotypes (1.4% vs. 1.8%, p = 0.296). Increased LTBI risk was associated with older age, male sex, Hispanic ethnicity, multidrug-resistant TB exposure, household exposure, and a longer exposure duration. Active TB risk was higher for males, HIV-positive individuals, and contacts with more prolonged exposure to index cases. The Beijing genotype was associated with increased TB case clustering (aOR = 1.98, 95%CI: 1.53, 2.55, p < 0.001) as compared to the non-Beijing genotypes. US birthplace (aOR = 2.75, 95%CI: 2.37, 3.19, p < 0.001), pulmonary disease (aOR = 1.27, 95%CI: 1.04, 1.56, p < 0.020), cavitary TB (aOR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.08, 1.44, p < 0.003), previous year alcohol use (aOR = 1.68, 95%CI: 1.38, 2.04, p < 0.001), and recreational drug use (aOR = 1.32, 95%CI: 1.04, 1.67, p <0.024) were also associated with an increased risk of TB case clustering. Conclusion: While the Beijing genotype did not increase the risk of LTBI or active TB among contacts, it showed a higher tendency for case clustering. Hence, interventions should prioritize populations where this genotype is prevalent.