Molecular Expression Assays Improve the Prediction of Local and Invasive Local Recurrence After Breast-Conserving Surgery for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ

被引:4
作者
Hahn, Ezra [1 ,2 ]
Sutradhar, Rinku [3 ,4 ]
Paszat, Lawrence [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Nguyen, Lena [3 ]
Rodin, Danielle [1 ,2 ]
Nofech-Mozes, Sharon [6 ,7 ]
Trebinjac, Sabina [5 ]
Jerzak, Katarzyna J. [8 ]
Fong, Cindy [3 ]
Rakovitch, Eileen [2 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Radiat Med Program, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Radiat Oncol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Toronto, Dept Lab Med & Pathobiol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Pathol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[8] Odette Canc Ctr, Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
RISK; MANAGEMENT; RADIATION; CANCER; VALIDATION; WOMEN; DCIS; INDIVIDUALS; NOMOGRAM; EXCISION;
D O I
10.1200/JCO.23.02276
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PURPOSEDuctal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is routinely treated with adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). The inability to accurately estimate an individual's risk of local recurrence (LR) and invasive LR using clinicopathologic factors (CPF) contributes to the overtreatment of DCIS. We examined the impact of the 12-gene DCIS Score (DS) and the 21-gene Recurrence Score (RS) on the accuracy of predicting LR and invasive LR.METHODSA population-based cohort diagnosed with pure DCIS treated with BCS +/- RT from 1994 to 2003 was used. All patients had expert pathology review and assessment of the DS and RS. Predictive models (CPF alone, DS + CPF, and RS + CPF) were developed using multivariable Cox regression analyses to predict 10-year LR and invasive LR risks. Models were evaluated on the basis of c-statistic, -2log likelihood estimate (-2LLE), and Akaike information criterion. Calibration was performed using bootstrap resamples, with replacement.RESULTSThe cohort includes 1,226 women treated with BCS; 712 received RT. 194 women (15.8%) experienced ipsilateral LR as a first event; 112 were invasive. Models including the DS or RS performed better in predicting the 10-year risk of LR compared with models on the basis of CPF alone with excellent calibration. The two molecular-based models also performed better in predicting invasive LR compared with the CPF model but the model incorporating the RS did not perform better in the prediction of invasive LR compared with the DS-based model.CONCLUSIONModels incorporating the DS or RS more accurately predicted the 10-year risk of LR and invasive LR after BCS compared with models on the basis of CPF alone. Inclusion of the RS, compared with DS, did not improve the prediction of the 10-year risk of invasive LR.
引用
收藏
页码:3196 / 3206
页数:13
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   A Biological Signature for Breast Ductal Carcinoma In Situ to Predict Radiotherapy Benefit and Assess Recurrence Risk [J].
Bremer, Troy ;
Whitworth, Pat W. ;
Patel, Rakesh ;
Savala, Jess ;
Barry, Todd ;
Lyle, Stephen ;
Leesman, Glen ;
Linke, Steven P. ;
Jirstrom, Karin ;
Zhou, Wenjing ;
Amini, Rose-Marie ;
Warnberg, Fredrik .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 24 (23) :5895-5901
[2]   The management of ductal carcinoma in situ in north America and Europe - Results of a survey [J].
Ceilley, E ;
Jagsi, R ;
Goldberg, S ;
Kachnic, L ;
Powell, S ;
Taghian, A .
CANCER, 2004, 101 (09) :1958-1967
[3]   Prescribing practices of endocrine therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ in British Columbia [J].
Chaudhry, A. T. ;
Koulis, T. A. ;
Speers, C. ;
Olson, R. A. .
CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2018, 25 (02) :133-138
[4]   Radiation doses and fractionation schedules in non-low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ in the breast (BIG 3-07/TROG 07.01): a randomised, factorial, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 study [J].
Chua, Boon H. ;
Link, Emma K. ;
Kunkler, Ian H. ;
Whelan, Timothy J. ;
Westenberg, A. Helen ;
Gruber, Guenther ;
Bryant, Guy ;
Ahern, Verity ;
Purohit, Kash ;
Graham, Peter H. ;
Akra, Mohamed ;
McArdle, Orla ;
O'Brien, Peter ;
Harvey, Jennifer A. ;
Kirkove, Carine ;
Maduro, John H. ;
Campbell, Ian D. ;
Delaney, Geoff P. ;
Martin, Joseph D. ;
Vu, T. Trinh T. ;
Muanza, Thierry M. ;
Neal, Anthony ;
Olivotto, Ivo A. .
LANCET, 2022, 400 (10350) :431-440
[5]   National breast cancer audit:: Ductal carcinoma in situ management in australia and new zealand [J].
Cuncins-Hearn, Astrid ;
Boult, Margaret ;
Babidge, Wendy ;
Zorbas, Helen ;
Villanueva, Elmer ;
Evans, Alison ;
Oliver, David ;
Kollias, James ;
Reeve, Tom ;
Maddern, Guy .
ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 77 (1-2) :64-68
[6]  
Ernster VL, 2002, JNCI-J NATL CANCER I, V94, P1546
[7]   The COMET (Comparison of Operative versus Monitoring and Endocrine Therapy) trial: a phase III randomised controlled clinical trial for low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) [J].
Hwang, E. Shelley ;
Hyslop, Terry ;
Lynch, Thomas ;
Frank, Elizabeth ;
Pinto, Donna ;
Basila, Desiree ;
Collyar, Deborah ;
Bennett, Antonia ;
Kaplan, Celia ;
Rosenberg, Shoshana ;
Thompson, Alastair ;
Weiss, Anna ;
Partridge, Ann .
BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (03) :e026797
[8]   Randomized Phase III Trial Evaluating Radiation Following Surgical Excision for Good-Risk Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Long-Term Report From NRG Oncology/RTOG 9804 [J].
McCormick, Beryl ;
Winter, Kathryn A. ;
Woodward, Wendy ;
Kuerer, Henry M. ;
Sneige, Nour ;
Rakovitch, Eileen ;
Smith, Barbara L. ;
Germain, Isabelle ;
Hartford, Alan C. ;
O'Rourke, Mark A. ;
Walker, Eleanor M. ;
Strom, Eric A. ;
Hopkins, Judith O. ;
Pierce, Lori J. ;
Pu, Anthony T. ;
Sumida, Kenneth N. M. ;
Vesprini, Danny ;
Moughan, Jennifer ;
White, Julia R. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 39 (32) :3574-+
[9]   Standard for the management of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast (DCIS) [J].
Morrow, M ;
Strom, EA ;
Bassett, LW ;
Dershaw, DD ;
Fowble, B ;
Harris, JR ;
O'Malley, F ;
Schnitt, SJ ;
Singletary, SE ;
Winchester, DP .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2002, 52 (05) :256-276
[10]  
Olivotto I, 2001, CAN MED ASSOC J, V165, P912