Evaluation of the Results of Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection and Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction Treatments in Patients with Nonobstructive Azoospermia According to Etiological Factors: A Retrospective Analysis

Objective: This study aimed to retrospectively compare the results of microdissection testicular sperm extraction (microTESE) and Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatments in nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) patients with different aetiologies. Determinants (clinical characteristics) for microTESE outcomes were compared between patients with successful sperm retrieval (SSR) and sperm retrieval failure (SRF). Material and Method: A total of 510 NOA patients who underwent microTESE between January 2015 and January 2024 were included in this study. Patients were classified according to the cause of NOA and SSR, fertilisation rate, clinical pregnancy, and overall live birth rate were evaluated. Results: The SSR rate was 44.1% in the whole population. The idiopathic patient group had the lowest SSR rate (X2: 2 : 34.81; p<0.01). There was no difference between the groups in terms of fertilisation rate, clinical pregnancy and overall live birth rate. There was a negative correlation between age and SSR rates in patients with idiopathic NOA (t:-0.27; p<0.01). SSR rates were higher in patients with cryptorchidism (right: t:0.8; P:0.003; left: t:0.72; p:0.002) and mumps orchitis (right: t:0.76; P<0.01; left: t:0.76; p=0.003). Conclusion: Etiology has a significant role in terms of SSR in patients with NOA. SSR was found to be significantly less in patients with idiopathic NOA compared to other causes. In addition, age and testicular volume were significant predictive factors for SSR in patients with idiopathic and acquired NOA.