Systematic review of barriers, facilitators, and tools to promote shared decision making in the emergency department

被引:2
|
作者
Ubbink, Dirk T. [1 ]
Matthijssen, Melissa [2 ]
Lemrini, Samia [2 ]
van Etten-Jamaludin, Faridi S. [3 ]
Bloemers, Frank W. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Univ Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Locat AMC, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam NL-1105 AZ, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Fac Med, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Univ Med Ctr, Res Support Med Lib, Locat AMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Trauma Surg, Locat AMC, Amsterdam Univ Med Ctr, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
barriers; emergency department; facilitators; patient decision aids; shared decision making; MIXED-METHODS; CHOICE; CARE; AID; INTERVENTION; MEDICINE;
D O I
10.1111/acem.14998
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
ObjectiveThe objective was to systematically review all studies focusing on barriers, facilitators, and tools currently available for shared decision making (SDM) in emergency departments (EDs).BackgroundImplementing SDM in EDs seems particularly challenging, considering the fast-paced environment and sometimes life-threatening situations. Over 10 years ago, a previous review revealed only a few patient decision aids (PtDAs) available for EDs.MethodsLiterature searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane library, up to November 2023. Observational and interventional studies were included to address barriers or facilitators for SDM or to investigate effects of PtDAs on the level of SDM for patients visiting an ED.ResultsWe screened 1946 studies for eligibility, of which 33 were included. PtDAs studied in EDs address chest pain, syncope, analgesics usage, lumbar puncture, ureterolithiasis, vascular access, concussion/brain bleeding, head-CT choice, coaching for elderly people, and activation of patients with appendicitis. Only the primary outcome was meta-analyzed, showing that PtDAs significantly increased the level of SDM (18.8 on the 100-point OPTION scale; 95% CI 12.5-25.0). PtDAs also tended to increase patient knowledge, decrease decisional conflict and decrease health care services usage, with no obvious effect on overall patient satisfaction. Barriers and facilitators were identified on three levels: (1) patient level-emotions, health literacy, and their own proactivity; (2) clinician level-fear of medicolegal consequences, lack of SDM skills or knowledge, and their ideas about treatment superiority; and (3) system level-time constraints, institutional guidelines, and availability of PtDAs.ConclusionsCircumstances in EDs are generally less favorable for SDM. However, PtDAs for conditions seen in EDs are helpful in overcoming barriers to SDM and are welcomed by patients. Even in EDs, SDM is feasible and supported by an increasing number of tools for patients and physicians.
引用
收藏
页码:1037 / 1049
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Interventions to support shared decision making for medication therapy in long term conditions: A systematic review
    Mathijssen, Elke G. E.
    van den Bemt, Bart J. F.
    van den Hoogen, Frank H. J.
    Popa, Calin D.
    Vriezekolk, Johanna E.
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2020, 103 (02) : 254 - 265
  • [42] State of the Science: Tools and Measurement for Shared Decision Making
    Sepucha, Karen R.
    Breslin, Maggie
    Graffeo, Charles
    Carpenter, Christopher R.
    Hess, Erik P.
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 23 (12) : 1325 - 1331
  • [43] Shared Decision-Making with Parents of Acutely Ill Children: A Narrative Review
    Aronson, Paul L.
    Shapiro, Eugene D.
    Niccolai, Linda M.
    Fraenkel, Liana
    ACADEMIC PEDIATRICS, 2018, 18 (01) : 3 - 7
  • [44] Emergency nurse and physician perceptions of barriers and facilitators to optimal nutrition in the emergency department: A national cross-sectional survey
    Lyu, Yang
    Yu, Han
    Jia, Kai
    Chen, Gang
    He, Xinhua
    Muir, Rachel
    INTERNATIONAL EMERGENCY NURSING, 2023, 70
  • [45] Humanistic communication in the evaluation of shared decision making: A systematic review
    Kunneman, Marleen
    Gionfriddo, Michael R.
    Toloza, Freddy J. K.
    Gartner, Fania R.
    Spencer-Bonilla, Gabriela
    Hargraves, Ian G.
    Erwin, Patricia J.
    Montori, Victor M.
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2019, 102 (03) : 452 - 466
  • [46] Physician attitudes toward shared decision making: A systematic review
    Pollard, Samantha
    Bansback, Nick
    Bryan, Stirling
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2015, 98 (09) : 1046 - 1057
  • [47] Shared decision-making in underserved populations with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review
    Ben-Zacharia, Aliza Bitton
    Smrtka, Jen
    Kalina, J. Tamar
    Vignos, Megan
    Smith, Stacyann
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND RELATED DISORDERS, 2024, 90
  • [48] Evaluation of a shared decision-making intervention for pediatric patients with asthma in the emergency department
    Reeves, Kelly
    O'Hare, Katherine
    Shade, Lindsay
    Ludden, Thomas
    Mcwilliams, Andrew
    Manning, Melinda
    Hogg, Melanie
    Reynolds, Stacy
    Shea, Christopher M.
    Burton, Elizabeth C.
    Calvert, Melissa
    Derkowski, Diane M.
    Tapp, Hazel
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 1 (01):
  • [49] A systematic review of the effectiveness of decision making interventions on increasing perceptions of shared decision making occurring in advanced cancer consultations
    Punnett, Grant
    Eastwood, Charlotte
    Green, Laura
    Yorke, Janelle
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2024, 123
  • [50] The Promise of Electronic Health Records to Promote Shared Decision Making: A Narrative Review and a Look Ahead
    Kuo, Alyce Mei-Shiuan
    Thavalathil, Berry
    Elwyn, Glyn
    Nemeth, Zsuzsanna
    Dang, Stuti
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2018, 38 (08) : 1040 - 1045