Systematic review of barriers, facilitators, and tools to promote shared decision making in the emergency department

被引:2
|
作者
Ubbink, Dirk T. [1 ]
Matthijssen, Melissa [2 ]
Lemrini, Samia [2 ]
van Etten-Jamaludin, Faridi S. [3 ]
Bloemers, Frank W. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Univ Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Locat AMC, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam NL-1105 AZ, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Fac Med, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Univ Med Ctr, Res Support Med Lib, Locat AMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Trauma Surg, Locat AMC, Amsterdam Univ Med Ctr, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
barriers; emergency department; facilitators; patient decision aids; shared decision making; MIXED-METHODS; CHOICE; CARE; AID; INTERVENTION; MEDICINE;
D O I
10.1111/acem.14998
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
ObjectiveThe objective was to systematically review all studies focusing on barriers, facilitators, and tools currently available for shared decision making (SDM) in emergency departments (EDs).BackgroundImplementing SDM in EDs seems particularly challenging, considering the fast-paced environment and sometimes life-threatening situations. Over 10 years ago, a previous review revealed only a few patient decision aids (PtDAs) available for EDs.MethodsLiterature searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane library, up to November 2023. Observational and interventional studies were included to address barriers or facilitators for SDM or to investigate effects of PtDAs on the level of SDM for patients visiting an ED.ResultsWe screened 1946 studies for eligibility, of which 33 were included. PtDAs studied in EDs address chest pain, syncope, analgesics usage, lumbar puncture, ureterolithiasis, vascular access, concussion/brain bleeding, head-CT choice, coaching for elderly people, and activation of patients with appendicitis. Only the primary outcome was meta-analyzed, showing that PtDAs significantly increased the level of SDM (18.8 on the 100-point OPTION scale; 95% CI 12.5-25.0). PtDAs also tended to increase patient knowledge, decrease decisional conflict and decrease health care services usage, with no obvious effect on overall patient satisfaction. Barriers and facilitators were identified on three levels: (1) patient level-emotions, health literacy, and their own proactivity; (2) clinician level-fear of medicolegal consequences, lack of SDM skills or knowledge, and their ideas about treatment superiority; and (3) system level-time constraints, institutional guidelines, and availability of PtDAs.ConclusionsCircumstances in EDs are generally less favorable for SDM. However, PtDAs for conditions seen in EDs are helpful in overcoming barriers to SDM and are welcomed by patients. Even in EDs, SDM is feasible and supported by an increasing number of tools for patients and physicians.
引用
收藏
页码:1037 / 1049
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Minority patient preferences, barriers, and facilitators for shared decision-making with health care providers in the USA: A systematic review
    Jolles, Monica Perez
    Richmond, Jennifer
    Thomas, Kathleen C.
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2019, 102 (07) : 1251 - 1262
  • [22] Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: Update of a systematic review of health professionals' perceptions
    Legare, France
    Ratte, Stephane
    Gravel, Karine
    Graham, Ian D.
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2008, 73 (03) : 526 - 535
  • [23] Computer-Based Decision Tools for Shared Therapeutic Decision-making in Oncology: Systematic Review
    Yung, Alan
    Kay, Judy
    Beale, Philip
    Gibson, Kathryn A.
    Shaw, Tim
    JMIR CANCER, 2021, 7 (04):
  • [24] The Barriers and Facilitators of Shared Decision Making in Pediatric Otolaryngology: A Qualitative Study
    Khan, Usman
    Luther, Erin
    Cassidy, Christine E.
    Boss, Emily
    Meister, Kara D.
    Bohm, Lauren
    Graham, M. Elise
    Hong, Paul
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2025, 172 (01) : 273 - 282
  • [25] Tools to Promote Shared Decision-Making in Lung Cancer Screening Using Low-Dose CT Scanning A Systematic Review
    Fukunaga, Mayuko Ito
    Halligan, Kyle
    Kodela, Jennifer
    Toomey, Shaun
    Furtado, Vanessa Fiorini
    Luckmann, Roger
    Han, Paul K. J.
    Mazor, Kathleen M.
    Singh, Sonal
    CHEST, 2020, 158 (06) : 2646 - 2657
  • [26] Barriers and Facilitators to Shared Decision-making Among African-Americans with Diabetes
    Peek, Monica E.
    Wilson, Shannon C.
    Gorawara-Bhat, Rita
    Odoms-Young, Angela
    Quinn, Michael T.
    Chin, Marshall H.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2009, 24 (10) : 1135 - 1139
  • [27] Determinants of decision-making for the initiation of resuscitation: a mixed-methods systematic review of barriers and facilitators
    Moghbeli, Golshan
    Roshangar, Fariborz
    Soheili, Amin
    Ahmadi, Fazlollah
    Feizollahzadeh, Hossein
    Hassankhani, Hadi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2024, 17 (01)
  • [28] Barriers and Facilitators to Nurse-Provider Communication in the Emergency Department: A Scoping Review
    Borawski, Sylwia
    Ralph, Jody
    Mulcaster, Adam
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH, 2025,
  • [29] Barriers and facilitators for shared decision-making in oncology inpatient practice: an explorative study of the healthcare providers’ perspective
    Milou Steenbergen
    Jolanda de Vries
    Rita Arts
    Laurens V. Beerepoot
    Marjan J. Traa
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022, 30 : 3925 - 3931
  • [30] Shared decision making: what effectiveness on health outcomes? A systematic review
    Vallot, Sophie
    Yana, Jonathan
    Moscova, Laura
    Favre, Julie
    Brossier, Sophie
    Aubin-Auger, Isabelle
    Renard, Vincent
    Ferrat, Emilie
    EXERCER-LA REVUE FRANCOPHONE DE MEDECINE GENERALE, 2019, (149): : 25 - 38