Shared micro-mobility and transport equity: A case study of three European countries

被引:3
作者
Guan, Xiaodong [1 ]
van Lierop, Dea
An, Zihao [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Heinen, Eva [2 ,6 ,7 ]
Ettema, Dick [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Fac Geosci, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Leeds, Inst Transport Studies, Leeds, England
[3] Univ Cambridge, Dept Land Econ, Cambridge, England
[4] Univ Cambridge, Cambridge Ctr Smart Infrastructure & Construct, Cambridge, England
[5] Univ Cambridge, Cambridge Ctr Environm Energy & Nat Resource Gover, Cambridge, England
[6] Tech Univ Dortmund, Fac Spatial Planning, Dept Transport Planning, Dortmund, Germany
[7] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Architecture & Technol, Trondheim, Norway
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
Shared micro-mobility; Transport equity; Transport poverty; Mobility; European cities; RESIDENTIAL SELF-SELECTION; BICYCLE-SHARING SYSTEMS; USAGE PATTERNS; BIKE-SHARE; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR; E-SCOOTERS; IMPACT; DISADVANTAGE; EXCLUSION; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cities.2024.105298
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
Shared micro-mobility services (e.g., shared bikes/e-bikes/e-scooters) have the potential to facilitate transport equity by offering available travel modes for transport disadvantaged groups. The achievement of this goal requires disadvantaged people to be able to use and benefit from shared micro-mobility equally compared with others. However, while many studies have explored the equity impact of shared micro-mobility from the perspective of its spatially and socially unequal usage, how its use can help alleviate transport poverty remains unclear. This study provides a more comprehensive picture of the role that shared micro-mobility services play on transport equity by investigating the influential factors of shared micro-mobility use and its impact on perceived transport poverty between different income groups. We developed regression models using data from an online survey conducted in 2022 in three European cities (Malmo<spacing diaeresis>, Manchester, and Utrecht). The results suggest that some transport disadvantaged groups (the elderly, females, car non-owners, and suburban residents) used shared micro-mobility less than others in our sample. Shared micro-mobility use shows little potential in promoting the users' accessibility and travel affordability. Nonetheless, shared e-scooters/e-mopeds have a great potential in facilitating transport equity by favoring low-income users' mobility equally or more greatly compared with that of high-income users.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 83 条
  • [1] Do we all need shared E-scooters? An accessibility-centered spatial equity evaluation approach
    Abouelela, Mohamed
    Duran-Rodas, David
    Antoniou, Constantinos
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2024, 181
  • [2] Stereotypes and the public acceptability of shared micromobility
    An, Zihao
    Mullen, Caroline
    Zhao, Chunli
    Heinen, Eva
    [J]. TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR AND SOCIETY, 2023, 33
  • [3] Toward Equitable Micromobility: Lessons from Austin E-Scooter Sharing Program
    Bai, Shunhua
    Jiao, Junfeng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLANNING EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, 2021, : 1331 - 1346
  • [4] The relationship between E-scooter travels and daily leisure activities in Austin, Texas
    Bai, Shunhua
    Jiao, Junfeng
    Chen, Yefu
    Guo, Jiani
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 95
  • [5] Dockless E-scooter usage patterns and urban built Environments: A comparison study of Austin, TX, and Minneapolis, MN
    Bai, Shunhua
    Jiao, Junfeng
    [J]. TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR AND SOCIETY, 2020, 20 : 264 - 272
  • [6] A statistical analysis of bike sharing usage and its potential as an auto-trip substitute
    Barbour, Natalia
    Zhang, Yu
    Mannering, Fred
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT & HEALTH, 2019, 12 : 253 - 262
  • [7] Barriers and facilitators to bikeshare programs: A qualitative study in an urban environment
    Bateman, Lori Brand
    Fouad, Mona N.
    Sullivan, Andrew
    Heider, Laura
    Oates, Gabriela R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT & HEALTH, 2021, 21
  • [8] Electric Scooter Sharing and Bike Sharing User Behaviour and Characteristics
    Bielinski, Tomasz
    Wazna, Agnieszka
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (22) : 1 - 13
  • [9] Bike sharing use in conjunction to public transport: Exploring spatiotemporal, age and gender dimensions in Oslo, Norway
    Bocker, Lars
    Anderson, Ellinor
    Uteng, Tanu Priya
    Throndsen, Torstein
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2020, 138 : 389 - 401
  • [10] The economic contribution of public bike-share to the sustainability and efficient functioning of cities
    Bullock, Craig
    Brereton, Finbarr
    Bailey, Sive
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2017, 28 : 76 - 87