Current Perceptions, Practice Patterns, and Barriers to Adoption of Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Under Local Anesthesia

被引:3
作者
Bulusu, Asha
Ferrante, Stephanie
Wu, Richard C.
Qi, Ji
Montie, Jim
Ginsburg, Kevin B.
Semerjian, Alice
Raman, Jay D.
Ginzburg, Serge
Patel, Amit
Rogers, Craig G.
George, Valal K.
Stork, Brian
George, Arvin K.
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Urol, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[2] E Da Hosp, Dept Urol, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[3] I Shou Univ, Sch Med, Coll Med, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[4] Wayne State Univ, Dept Urol, Detroit, MI USA
[5] IHA Urol, Ypsilanti, MI USA
[6] Penn State Hlth, Dept Urol, Hershey, PA USA
[7] Einstein Med Ctr Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA USA
[8] Henry Ford Hlth Syst, Vattikuti Urol Inst, Detroit, MI USA
[9] Michigan Inst Urol, Troy, MI USA
[10] Johns Hopkins Univ, Brady Urol Inst, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2024.04.019
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess perceptions, practice patterns, and barriers to adoption of transperineal prostate biopsy (TPBx) under local anesthesia. Methods: Providers from Michigan urological surgery improvement collaborative (MUSIC) and Pennsylvania urologic regional collaborative (PURC) were administered an online survey to assess beliefs and educational needs regarding TPBx. Providers were divided into those who performed or did not perform TPBx. The MUSIC and PURC registries were queried to assess TPBx utilization. Descriptive analytics and bivariate analysis determined associations between provider/practice demographics and attitudes. Results: Since 2019, TPBx adoption has increased more than 2-fold to 7.0% and 16% across MUSIC and PURC practices, respectively. Of 350 urologists invited to participate in a survey, a total of 91 complete responses were obtained with 21 respondents (23%) reported performing TPBx. Participants estimated the learning curve was <10 procedure for TPBx performers and non-performers. No significant association was observed between learning curve and provider age/practice setting. The major perceived benefits of TPBx were decreased risk of sepsis, improved cancer detection rate and antibiotic stewardship. The most commonly cited challenges to implementation included access to equipment and patient experience. Urologists performing TPBx reported learning curve as an additional barrier, while those not performing TPBx reported duration of procedure. Conclusion: Access to equipment and patient experience concerns remain substantial barriers to adoption of TPBx. Dissemination of techniques utilizing existing equipment and optimization of local anesthetic protocols for TPBx may help facilitate the continued adoption of TPBx.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 18
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Briggs L.G., 2021, Evaluation of In-Office MRI/ US Fusion Transperineal Prostate Biopsy via Free-hand Device during Routine, V155, P26, DOI [10.1016/j.urology.2021.04.040, DOI 10.1016/J.UROLOGY.2021.04.040]
[2]  
Briggs L.G., 2021, Evaluation of In-Office MRI/ US Fusion Transperineal Prostate Biopsy via Free-hand Device during Routine, V155, P0090, DOI [10.1016/j.urology.2021.04.040, DOI 10.1016/J.UROLOGY.2021.04.040]
[3]   Transrectal versus transperineal 14-core prostate biopsy in detection of prostate cancer: A comparative evaluation at the same Institution [J].
Cerruto, Maria Angela ;
Vianello, Fabio ;
D'Elia, Carolina ;
Artibani, Walter ;
Novella, Giovanni .
ARCHIVIO ITALIANO DI UROLOGIA E ANDROLOGIA, 2014, 86 (04) :284-287
[4]   Healthcare Costs of Post-Prostate Biopsy Sepsis [J].
Gross, Michael D. ;
Alshak, Mark N. ;
Shoag, Jonathan E. ;
Laviana, Aaron A. ;
Gorin, Michael A. ;
Sedrakyan, Art ;
Hu, Jim C. .
UROLOGY, 2019, 133 :11-15
[5]   "TREXIT 2020": why the time to abandon transrectal prostate biopsy starts now [J].
Grummet, Jeremy ;
Gorin, Michael A. ;
Popert, Rick ;
O'Brien, Tim ;
Lamb, Alastair D. ;
Hadaschik, Boris ;
Radtke, Jan Philipp ;
Wagenlehner, Florian ;
Baco, Eduard ;
Moore, Caroline M. ;
Emberton, Mark ;
George, Arvin K. ;
Davis, John W. ;
Szabo, Richard J. ;
Buckley, Roger ;
Loblaw, Andrew ;
Allaway, Matthew ;
Kastner, Christof ;
Briers, Erik ;
Royce, Peter L. ;
Frydenberg, Mark ;
Murphy, Declan G. ;
Woo, Henry H. .
PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2020, 23 (01) :62-65
[6]   Sepsis and 'superbugs': should we favour the transperineal over the transrectal approach for prostate biopsy? [J].
Grummet, Jeremy P. ;
Weerakoon, Mahesha ;
Huang, Sean ;
Lawrentschuk, Nathan ;
Frydenberg, Mark ;
Moon, Daniel A. ;
O'Reilly, Mary ;
Murphy, Declan .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 114 (03) :384-388
[7]   Comparison between Ultrasound Guided Transperineal and Transrectal Prostate Biopsy: A Prospective, Randomized, and Controlled Trial [J].
Guo, Le-Hang ;
Wu, Rong ;
Xu, Hui-Xiong ;
Xu, Jun-Mei ;
Wu, Jian ;
Wang, Shuai ;
Bo, Xiao-Wan ;
Liu, Bo-Ji .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2015, 5
[8]   Characterizing the learning curve of MRI-US fusion prostate biopsies [J].
Halstuch, Daniel ;
Baniel, Jack ;
Lifshitz, David ;
Sela, Sivan ;
Ber, Yaara ;
Margel, David .
PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2019, 22 (04) :546-551
[9]   Risk factors for and prophylactic effect of povidone-iodine rectal cleansing on infectious complications after prostate biopsy: a retrospective cohort study [J].
Hwang, Eu Chang ;
Jung, Seung Il ;
Seo, Young Ho ;
Jeong, Se Heon ;
Kwon, Dong Deuk ;
Park, Kwangsung ;
Kim, Jin Woong .
INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2015, 47 (04) :595-601
[10]   Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no antibiotic prophylaxis in transperineal prostate biopsies (NORAPP): a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial [J].
Jacewicz, Maciej ;
Guenzel, Karsten ;
Rud, Erik ;
Sandbaek, Gunnar ;
Magheli, Ahmed ;
Busch, Jonas ;
Hinz, Stefan ;
Baco, Eduard .
LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2022, 22 (10) :1465-1471