Multimodal MRI Brain Tumor Segmentation using 3D and 3D/2D Methods: A Study on the MICCAI BRATS Dataset

被引:0
|
作者
Gtifa, Wafa [1 ]
Khoja, Intissar [1 ]
Sakly, Anis [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Monastir, Monastir Natl Sch Engineers ENIM, Lab Automat & Elect Syst & Environm, Monastir, Tunisia
[2] Monastir Natl Sch Engineers, Lab Automat & Elect Syst & Environm, Monastir, Tunisia
来源
2024 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED SYSTEMS AND EMERGENT TECHNOLOGIES, ICASET 2024 | 2024年
关键词
3D; 3D/2D; Brain; Tumor; segmentation; BRATS2019;
D O I
10.1109/IC_ASET61847.2024.10596251
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This research paper presents a comparative analysis of the performance of 3D and 3D/2D brain tumor segmentation methods using DPSO on the BRATS 2019 dataset. The study specifically focuses on two categories: High-Grade Glioma (HGG) and Low-Grade Glioma (LGG). In the HGG category, the 3D segmentation method achieved moderate overlap with dice coefficients of 72% and 80% in Datasets 1 and 2, respectively. Comparatively, the 3D/2D method demonstrated slightly lower performance with dice coefficients of 70% and 77%. Shifting to the LGG category, the 3D method exhibited high agreement with dice coefficients of 90.20% and 95% in Datasets 3 and 4, respectively. The 3D/2D method achieved slightly lower dice coefficients of 87% and 84% in the same datasets. Overall, the results emphasize the superiority of the 3D method in accurately delineating brain tumors, as it consistently outperformed the 3D/2D method across all datasets. However, it is important to note that the 3D/2D method also demonstrated reasonably good performance, making it a viable alternative, particularly in scenarios where computational resources or time constraints are a consideration. This research significantly contributes to the advancement of brain tumor segmentation methods by offering valuable insights into the comparative performance of 3D and 3D/2D approaches. The findings shed light on the strengths and limitations of each method.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Multimodal interaction for 2D and 3D environments
    Cohen, P
    McGee, D
    Oviatt, S
    Wu, LZ
    Clow, J
    King, R
    Julier, S
    Rosenblum, L
    IEEE COMPUTER GRAPHICS AND APPLICATIONS, 1999, 19 (04) : 10 - 13
  • [22] Variational-Autoencoder Regularized 3D MultiResUNet for the BraTS 2020 Brain Tumor Segmentation
    Tang, Jiarui
    Li, Tengfei
    Shu, Hai
    Zhu, Hongtu
    BRAINLESION: GLIOMA, MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS, STROKE AND TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURIES (BRAINLES 2020), PT II, 2021, 12659 : 431 - 440
  • [23] SwinBTS: A Method for 3D Multimodal Brain Tumor Segmentation Using Swin Transformer
    Jiang, Yun
    Zhang, Yuan
    Lin, Xin
    Dong, Jinkun
    Cheng, Tongtong
    Liang, Jing
    BRAIN SCIENCES, 2022, 12 (06)
  • [24] 3D Segmentation of Brain Tumor MRI Image Based on RAPNet
    Hu M.
    Xiong S.
    Huang H.
    Zhang G.
    Wang C.
    Beijing Youdian Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, 2023, 46 (02): : 91 - 97
  • [25] An accurate segmentation method for volumetry of brain tumor in 3D MRI
    Wang, Jiahui
    Li, Qiang
    Hirai, Toshinori
    Katsuragawa, Shigehiko
    Li, Feng
    Doi, Kunio
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2008: IMAGE PROCESSING, PTS 1-3, 2008, 6914
  • [26] INSTANCE SEGMENTATION OF 3D MESH MODEL BY INTEGRATING 2D AND 3D DATA
    Wang, W. X.
    Zhong, G. X.
    Huang, J. J.
    Li, X. M.
    Xie, L. F.
    GEOSPATIAL WEEK 2023, VOL. 48-1, 2023, : 1677 - 1684
  • [27] 2D sense for faster 3D MRI
    Markus Weiger
    Klaas P. Pruessmann
    Peter Boesiger
    Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine, 2002, 14 (1) : 10 - 19
  • [28] 2D SENSE for faster 3D MRI
    Weiger, M
    Pruessmann, KP
    Boesiger, P
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE MATERIALS IN PHYSICS BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2002, 14 (01): : 10 - 19
  • [29] Brain White Matter Lesion Segmentation with 2D/3D CNN
    Lopez-Zorrilla, A.
    de Velasco-Vazquez, M.
    Serradilla-Casado, O.
    Roa-Barco, L.
    Grana, M.
    Chyzhyk, D.
    Price, C. C.
    NATURAL AND ARTIFICIAL COMPUTATION FOR BIOMEDICINE AND NEUROSCIENCE, PT I, 2017, 10337 : 394 - 403
  • [30] 3D and 2D/3D holograms model
    A. A. Boriskevich
    V. K. Erohovets
    V. V. Tkachenko
    Optical Memory and Neural Networks, 2012, 21 (4) : 242 - 248