Multimodal MRI Brain Tumor Segmentation using 3D and 3D/2D Methods: A Study on the MICCAI BRATS Dataset

被引:0
作者
Gtifa, Wafa [1 ]
Khoja, Intissar [1 ]
Sakly, Anis [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Monastir, Monastir Natl Sch Engineers ENIM, Lab Automat & Elect Syst & Environm, Monastir, Tunisia
[2] Monastir Natl Sch Engineers, Lab Automat & Elect Syst & Environm, Monastir, Tunisia
来源
2024 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED SYSTEMS AND EMERGENT TECHNOLOGIES, ICASET 2024 | 2024年
关键词
3D; 3D/2D; Brain; Tumor; segmentation; BRATS2019;
D O I
10.1109/IC_ASET61847.2024.10596251
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This research paper presents a comparative analysis of the performance of 3D and 3D/2D brain tumor segmentation methods using DPSO on the BRATS 2019 dataset. The study specifically focuses on two categories: High-Grade Glioma (HGG) and Low-Grade Glioma (LGG). In the HGG category, the 3D segmentation method achieved moderate overlap with dice coefficients of 72% and 80% in Datasets 1 and 2, respectively. Comparatively, the 3D/2D method demonstrated slightly lower performance with dice coefficients of 70% and 77%. Shifting to the LGG category, the 3D method exhibited high agreement with dice coefficients of 90.20% and 95% in Datasets 3 and 4, respectively. The 3D/2D method achieved slightly lower dice coefficients of 87% and 84% in the same datasets. Overall, the results emphasize the superiority of the 3D method in accurately delineating brain tumors, as it consistently outperformed the 3D/2D method across all datasets. However, it is important to note that the 3D/2D method also demonstrated reasonably good performance, making it a viable alternative, particularly in scenarios where computational resources or time constraints are a consideration. This research significantly contributes to the advancement of brain tumor segmentation methods by offering valuable insights into the comparative performance of 3D and 3D/2D approaches. The findings shed light on the strengths and limitations of each method.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, P MICCAI BRATS
[2]  
Armya RE., 2021, Qubahan Acad J, V1, P71
[3]   Introducing the fractional-order Darwinian PSO [J].
Couceiro, Micael S. ;
Rocha, Rui P. ;
Fonseca Ferreira, N. M. ;
Tenreiro Machado, J. A. .
SIGNAL IMAGE AND VIDEO PROCESSING, 2012, 6 (03) :343-350
[4]   What is a good evaluation measure for semantic segmentation? [J].
Csurka, Gabriela ;
Larlus, Diane ;
Perronnin, Florent .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE BRITISH MACHINE VISION CONFERENCE 2013, 2013,
[5]  
Eberhart R., 1995, P 6 INT S MICR HUM S, P39, DOI DOI 10.1109/MHS.1995.494215
[6]  
Fu S.B., 2021, Journal of China West Normal University (Natural Science Edition), V42, P202
[7]   Brain tumor segmentation with Deep Neural Networks [J].
Havaei, Mohammad ;
Davy, Axel ;
Warde-Farley, David ;
Biard, Antoine ;
Courville, Aaron ;
Bengio, Yoshua ;
Pal, Chris ;
Jodoin, Pierre-Marc ;
Larochelle, Hugo .
MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2017, 35 :18-31
[8]   Brain Tumor Segmentation Using Multi-Cascaded Convolutional Neural Networks and Conditional Random Field [J].
Hu, Kai ;
Gan, Qinghai ;
Zhang, Yuan ;
Deng, Shuhua ;
Xiao, Fen ;
Huang, Wei ;
Cao, Chunhong ;
Gao, Xieping .
IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 :92615-92629
[9]   No New-Net [J].
Isensee, Fabian ;
Kickingereder, Philipp ;
Wick, Wolfgang ;
Bendszus, Martin ;
Maier-Hein, Klaus H. .
BRAINLESION: GLIOMA, MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS, STROKE AND TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURIES, BRAINLES 2018, PT II, 2019, 11384 :234-244
[10]  
Kennedy J, 1995, 1995 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NEURAL NETWORKS PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-6, P1942, DOI 10.1109/icnn.1995.488968