Evaluation of deep learning based dose prediction in head and neck cancer patients using two different types of input contours

被引:0
|
作者
Saito, Masahide [1 ]
Kadoya, Noriyuki [2 ]
Kimura, Yuto [3 ]
Nemoto, Hikaru [1 ,2 ]
Tozuka, Ryota [1 ,2 ]
Jingu, Keiichi [2 ]
Onishi, Hiroshi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Yamanashi, Dept Radiol, 1110 Shimokato, Chuo City, Yamanashi 4093898, Japan
[2] Tohoku Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Sendai, Japan
[3] Ofuna Chuo Hosp, Radiat Oncol Ctr, Kamakura, Japan
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2024年 / 25卷 / 12期
关键词
deep learning based dose prediction; head and neck cancer; volumetric-modulated arc therapy; INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY; SIMULTANEOUS INTEGRATED BOOST; PLAN QUALITY; METRICS;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.14519
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study evaluates deep learning (DL) based dose predictionmethods in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients using two types of inputcontours. Materials and methods: Seventy-five HNC patients undergoing two-stepvolumetric-modulated arc therapy were included. Dose prediction was per-formed using the AIVOT prototype (AiRato.Inc, Sendai, Japan), a commercialsoftware with an HD U-net-based dose distribution prediction system. Modelswere developed for the initial plan (46 Gy/23Fr) and boost plan (24 Gy/12Fr),trained with 65 cases and tested with 10 cases. The 8-channel model usedone target (PTV) and seven organs at risk (OARs),while the 10-channel modeladded two dummy contours (PTV ring and spinal cord PRV). Predicted anddeliverable doses, obtained through dose mimicking on another radiation treat-ment planning system, were evaluated using dose-volume indices for PTV andOARs. Results: For the initial plan, both models achieved approximately 2% predic-tion accuracy for the target dose and maintained accuracy within 3.2 Gy forOARs. The 10-channel model outperformed the 8-channel model for certaindose indices. For the boost plan, both models exhibited prediction accuraciesof approximately 2% for the target dose and 1 Gy for OARs. The 10-channelmodel showed significantly closer predictions to the ground truth for D50% andDmean. Deliverable plans based on prediction doses showed little significantdifference compared to the ground truth, especially for the boost plan. Conclusion: DL-based dose prediction using the AIVOT prototype software inHNC patients yielded promising results.While additional contours may enhanceprediction accuracy, their impact on dose mimicking is relatively small.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A cascade transformer-based model for 3D dose distribution prediction in head and neck cancer radiotherapy
    Gheshlaghi, Tara
    Nabavi, Shahabedin
    Shirzadikia, Samireh
    Moghaddam, Mohsen Ebrahimi
    Rostampour, Nima
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2024, 69 (04)
  • [22] Radiomics and dosiomics-based prediction of radiotherapy-induced xerostomia in head and neck cancer patients
    Abdollahi, Hamid
    Dehesh, Tania
    Abdalvand, Neda
    Rahmim, Arman
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION BIOLOGY, 2023, 99 (11) : 1669 - 1683
  • [23] Hyperspectral Imaging of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma for Cancer Margin Detection in Surgical Specimens from 102 Patients Using Deep Learning
    Halicek, Martin
    Dormer, James D.
    Little, James, V
    Chen, Amy Y.
    Myers, Larry
    Sumer, Baran D.
    Fe, Baowei
    CANCERS, 2019, 11 (09)
  • [24] A review of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in head and neck cancer patients for treatment evaluation and prediction of radiation-induced xerostomia
    Ermongkonchai, Tai
    Khor, Richard
    Wada, Morikatsu
    Lau, Eddie
    Xing, Daniel Tao
    Ng, Sweet Ping
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [25] Multitask Learning with Convolutional Neural Networks and Vision Transformers Can Improve Outcome Prediction for Head and Neck Cancer Patients
    Starke, Sebastian
    Zwanenburg, Alex
    Leger, Karoline
    Lohaus, Fabian
    Linge, Annett
    Kalinauskaite, Goda
    Tinhofer, Inge
    Guberina, Nika
    Guberina, Maja
    Balermpas, Panagiotis
    von der Gruen, Jens
    Ganswindt, Ute
    Belka, Claus
    Peeken, Jan C.
    Combs, Stephanie E.
    Boeke, Simon
    Zips, Daniel
    Richter, Christian
    Troost, Esther G. C.
    Krause, Mechthild
    Baumann, Michael
    Loeck, Steffen
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (19)
  • [26] Improving the prediction of overall survival for head and neck cancer patients using image biomarkers in combination with clinical parameters
    Zhai, Tian-Tian
    van Dijk, Lisanne V.
    Huang, Bao-Tian
    Lin, Zhi-Xiong
    Ribeiro, Cassia O.
    Brouwer, Charlotte L.
    Oosting, Sjoukje F.
    Halmos, Gyorgy B.
    Witjes, Max J. H.
    Langendijk, Johannes A.
    Steenbakkers, Roel J. H. M.
    Sijtsema, Nanna M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2017, 124 (02) : 256 - 262
  • [27] Deep learning-based auto-delineation of gross tumour volumes and involved nodes in PET/CT images of head and neck cancer patients
    Yngve Mardal Moe
    Aurora Rosvoll Groendahl
    Oliver Tomic
    Einar Dale
    Eirik Malinen
    Cecilia Marie Futsaether
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2021, 48 : 2782 - 2792
  • [28] Evaluation of Target Volume Location and Its Impact on Delivered Dose Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scans for Patients with Head and Neck Cancer
    Grover, Devyn
    Laraque, Malcolm
    Debenham, Brock
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION SCIENCES, 2019, 50 (03) : 387 - 397
  • [29] Fusion-based tensor radiomics using reproducible features: Application to survival prediction in head and neck cancer
    Salmanpour, Mohammad R.
    Hosseinzadeh, Mahdi
    Rezaeijo, Seyed Masoud
    Rahmim, Arman
    COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 2023, 240
  • [30] Deep learning-based auto-delineation of gross tumour volumes and involved nodes in PET/CT images of head and neck cancer patients
    Moe, Yngve Mardal
    Groendahl, Aurora Rosvoll
    Tomic, Oliver
    Dale, Einar
    Malinen, Eirik
    Futsaether, Cecilia Marie
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2021, 48 (09) : 2782 - 2792