Evaluation of deep learning based dose prediction in head and neck cancer patients using two different types of input contours

被引:0
作者
Saito, Masahide [1 ]
Kadoya, Noriyuki [2 ]
Kimura, Yuto [3 ]
Nemoto, Hikaru [1 ,2 ]
Tozuka, Ryota [1 ,2 ]
Jingu, Keiichi [2 ]
Onishi, Hiroshi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Yamanashi, Dept Radiol, 1110 Shimokato, Chuo City, Yamanashi 4093898, Japan
[2] Tohoku Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Sendai, Japan
[3] Ofuna Chuo Hosp, Radiat Oncol Ctr, Kamakura, Japan
关键词
deep learning based dose prediction; head and neck cancer; volumetric-modulated arc therapy; INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY; SIMULTANEOUS INTEGRATED BOOST; PLAN QUALITY; METRICS;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.14519
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study evaluates deep learning (DL) based dose predictionmethods in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients using two types of inputcontours. Materials and methods: Seventy-five HNC patients undergoing two-stepvolumetric-modulated arc therapy were included. Dose prediction was per-formed using the AIVOT prototype (AiRato.Inc, Sendai, Japan), a commercialsoftware with an HD U-net-based dose distribution prediction system. Modelswere developed for the initial plan (46 Gy/23Fr) and boost plan (24 Gy/12Fr),trained with 65 cases and tested with 10 cases. The 8-channel model usedone target (PTV) and seven organs at risk (OARs),while the 10-channel modeladded two dummy contours (PTV ring and spinal cord PRV). Predicted anddeliverable doses, obtained through dose mimicking on another radiation treat-ment planning system, were evaluated using dose-volume indices for PTV andOARs. Results: For the initial plan, both models achieved approximately 2% predic-tion accuracy for the target dose and maintained accuracy within 3.2 Gy forOARs. The 10-channel model outperformed the 8-channel model for certaindose indices. For the boost plan, both models exhibited prediction accuraciesof approximately 2% for the target dose and 1 Gy for OARs. The 10-channelmodel showed significantly closer predictions to the ground truth for D50% andDmean. Deliverable plans based on prediction doses showed little significantdifference compared to the ground truth, especially for the boost plan. Conclusion: DL-based dose prediction using the AIVOT prototype software inHNC patients yielded promising results.While additional contours may enhanceprediction accuracy, their impact on dose mimicking is relatively small.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   OpenKBP: The open-access knowledge-based planning grand challenge and dataset [J].
Babier, Aaron ;
Zhang, Binghao ;
Mahmood, Rafid ;
Moore, Kevin L. ;
Purdie, Thomas G. ;
McNiven, Andrea L. ;
Chan, Timothy C. Y. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (09) :5549-5561
[2]   Development and evaluation of radiotherapy deep learning dose prediction models for breast cancer [J].
Bakx, Nienke ;
Bluemink, Hanneke ;
Hagelaar, Els ;
van der Sangen, Maurice ;
Theuws, Jacqueline ;
Hurkmans, Coen .
PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2021, 17 :65-70
[3]   Comparative dosimetric study of two strategies of intensity-modulated radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal cancer [J].
Chen, SW ;
Yang, SN ;
Liang, JA ;
Shiau, AC ;
Lin, FJ .
MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2005, 30 (04) :219-227
[4]   A feasibility study on an automated method to generate patient-specific dose distributions for radiotherapy using deep learning [J].
Chen, Xinyuan ;
Men, Kuo ;
Li, Yexiong ;
Yi, Junlin ;
Dai, Jianrong .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (01) :56-64
[5]   3D radiotherapy dose prediction on head and neck cancer patients with a hierarchically densely connected U-net deep learning architecture [J].
Dan Nguyen ;
Jia, Xun ;
Sher, David ;
Lin, Mu-Han ;
Iqbal, Zohaib ;
Liu, Hui ;
Jiang, Steve .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2019, 64 (06)
[6]   Quality assurance for the EORTC 22071-26071 study: dummy run prospective analysis [J].
Fairchild, Alysa ;
Langendijk, Johannes A. ;
Nuyts, Sandra ;
Scrase, Christopher ;
Tomsej, Milan ;
Schuring, Danny ;
Gulyban, Akos ;
Ghosh, Sunita ;
Weber, Damien C. ;
Budach, Wilfried .
RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2014, 9 :248
[7]   Automatic treatment planning based on three-dimensional dose distribution predicted from deep learning technique [J].
Fan, Jiawei ;
Wang, Jiazhou ;
Chen, Zhi ;
Hu, Chaosu ;
Zhang, Zhen ;
Hu, Weigang .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (01) :370-381
[8]   Comparative dosimetric evaluation of the simultaneous integrated boost with photon intensity modulation in head and neck cancer patients [J].
Fogliata, A ;
Bolsi, A ;
Cozzi, L ;
Bernier, J .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2003, 69 (03) :267-275
[9]   Knowledge-based planning for intensity-modulated radiation therapy: A review of data-driven approaches [J].
Ge, Yaorong ;
Wu, Q. Jackie .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) :2760-2775
[10]   Deep Learning-Based Dose Prediction for Automated, Individualized Quality Assurance of Head and Neck Radiation Therapy Plans [J].
Gronberg, Mary P. ;
Beadle, Beth M. ;
Garden, Adam S. ;
Skinner, Heath ;
Gay, Skylar ;
Netherton, Tucker ;
Cao, Wenhua ;
Cardenas, Carlos E. ;
Chung, Christine ;
Fuentes, David T. ;
Fuller, Clifton D. ;
Howell, Rebecca M. ;
Jhingran, Anuja ;
Lim, Tze Yee ;
Marquez, Barbara ;
Mumme, Raymond ;
Olanrewaju, Adenike M. ;
Peterson, Christine B. ;
Vazquez, Ivan ;
Whitaker, Thomas J. ;
Wooten, Zachary ;
Yang, Ming ;
Court, Laurence E. .
PRACTICAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13 (03) :E282-E291