Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG as a probiotic for preterm infants: a strain specific systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
作者
Ananthan, Anitha [1 ]
Balasubramanian, Haribalakrishna [2 ]
Rath, Chandra [3 ]
Muthusamy, Saravanan [3 ]
Rao, Shripada [3 ,4 ]
Patole, Sanjay [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Seth GS Med Coll & King Edward Mem Hosp, Dept Neonatol, Mumbai, India
[2] Surya Mother & Child Care Hosp, Dept Neonatol, Mumbai, India
[3] Joondalup Hlth Campus, Dept Neonatol, Perth, WA, Australia
[4] Univ Western Australia, Sch Med, Perth, WA, Australia
[5] King Edward Mem Hosp Women, Neonatal Directorate, Perth, WA, Australia
关键词
BIRTH-WEIGHT INFANTS; NECROTIZING ENTEROCOLITIS; DOUBLE-BLIND; ORAL SUPPLEMENTATION; ENTERIC COLONIZATION; PREMATURE-INFANTS; PREVENTION; PLACEBO; MICROBIOTA; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1038/s41430-024-01474-0
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) is a widely used and extensively researched probiotic. Probiotic effects are considered to be strain specific. We aimed to comprehensively assess the strain-specific effects of LGG in preterm infants. A systematic review of RCTs and non-RCTs to evaluate the effect of LGG in preterm infants. We followed the Cochrane methodology, and preferred reporting items for systematic reviews (PRISMA) statement for conducting and reporting this review. We searched the Cochrane central register of controlled trials, PubMed, EMBASE and CINAHL databases till December 2023. The review was registered in PROSPERO 2022 CRD42022324933. Meta-analysis of data from RCTs that used LGG as the sole probiotic showed significantly lower risk of NEC >= Stage II [5 RCTs, n = 851, RR:0.50 (95% CI: 0.26, 0.93), P = 0.03] in the LGG group. There was no significant difference in the risk of LOS [7 RCTs, n = 1037, RR:1.08 (95% CI 0.84, 1.39), P = 0.55], mortality [3 RCTs, n = 207, RR: 0.99 (95% CI: 0.42, 2.33), P = 0.99], time to reach full feeds [2 RCTs, n = 19, SMD = 0.11 days (95% CI: -0.22, 0.45), P = 0.51] and duration of hospital stay [3 RCTs, n = 293, SMD: -0.14 days (95% CI: -0.37 to 0.09), P = 0.23]. Meta-analysis of data from non-RCTs showed no significant effect of LGG on NEC, LOS, and mortality. RCTs showed beneficial effects of LGG when used as the sole probiotic in reducing the risk of NEC, whereas observational studies did not. Strain-specific systematic review of LGG provides important data for guiding research and clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:830 / 846
页数:17
相关论文
共 58 条
  • [1] Effects of oral Lactobacillus GG on enteric microflora in low-birth-weight neonates
    Agarwal, R
    Sharma, N
    Chaudhry, R
    Deorari, A
    Paul, VK
    Gewolb, IH
    Panigrahi, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGY AND NUTRITION, 2003, 36 (03) : 397 - 402
  • [2] Probiotics-supplemented feeding in extremely low-birth-weight infants
    Al-Hosni, M.
    Duenas, M.
    Hawk, M.
    Stewart, L. A.
    Borghese, R. A.
    Cahoon, M.
    Atwood, L.
    Howard, D.
    Ferrelli, K.
    Soll, R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2012, 32 (04) : 253 - 259
  • [3] Double-blind, randomised clinical assay to evaluate the efficacy of probiotics in preterm newborns weighing less than 1500 g in the prevention of necrotising enterocolitis
    Alberto Fernandez-Carrocera, Luis
    Solis-Herrera, Aide
    Cabanillas-Ayon, Marisol
    Beatriz Gallardo-Sarmiento, Rocio
    Sarisol Garcia-Perez, Carmina
    Montano-Rodriguez, Rosalba
    Leticia Echaniz-Aviles, Maria Olga
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD-FETAL AND NEONATAL EDITION, 2013, 98 (01): : F5 - F9
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2002, Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Working Group on Drafting Guidelines for the Evaluation of Probiotics in Food. London, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1469-0691.2012.03873
  • [5] Arora S., 2017, Int J Contemp Pediatr, V4, P1792, DOI [10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20173787, DOI 10.18203/2349-3291.IJCP20173787]
  • [6] A graphical method for exploring heterogeneity in meta-analyses:: application to a meta-analysis of 65 trials
    Baujat, B
    Mahé, C
    Pignon, JP
    Hill, C
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2002, 21 (18) : 2641 - 2652
  • [7] Apparently conclusive meta-analyses may be inconclusive-Trial sequential analysis adjustment of random error risk due to repetitive testing of accumulating data in apparently conclusive neonatal meta-analyses
    Brok, Jesper
    Thorlund, Kristian
    Wetterslev, Jorn
    Gluud, Christian
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2009, 38 (01) : 287 - 298
  • [8] Morbid obesity in Taiwan: Prevalence, trends, associated social demographics, and lifestyle factors
    Chang, Heng-Cheng
    Yang, Hsin-Chou
    Chang, Hsing-Yi
    Yeh, Chih-Jung
    Chen, Hsin-Hung
    Huang, Kuo-Chin
    Pan, Wen-Harn
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (02):
  • [9] Health benefits of probiotics: are mixtures more effective than single strains?
    Chapman, C. M. C.
    Gibson, G. R.
    Rowland, I.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2011, 50 (01) : 1 - 17
  • [10] Effects of Probiotics in Preterm Infants: A Network Meta-analysis
    Chi, Cheng
    Li, Cheng
    Buys, Nicholas
    Wang, Wenjun
    Yin, Chenghong
    Sun, Jing
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2021, 147 (01)