Patient-reported outcomes in total hip arthroplasty for patients with anatomically contoured femoral heads

被引:0
作者
Lim, Perry L. [1 ,2 ]
Freiberg, Andrew A. [1 ,2 ]
Melnic, Christopher M. [1 ,2 ]
Bedair, Hany S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Boston, MA USA
[2] Newton Wellesley Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Newton, MA USA
关键词
Anatomically contoured femoral head; iliopsoas tendinitis; minimally clinically important difference; patient-reported outcome measures; PSOAS IMPINGEMENT; SCORE; RISK;
D O I
10.1177/11207000241282985
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Iliopsoas tendinitis after total hip arthroplasty (THA) has become more prevalent with the increased use of large-diameter femoral heads impinging on native surrounding tissues. Anatomically contoured heads (ACH) are soft-tissue-friendly femoral heads created to minimise this issue. This retrospective study assesses iliopsoas tendinitis prevalence and re-operations in primary THAs with ACH, while determining the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) achievement and improvement with 5 patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 53 ACHs from January 2020 to July 2023. Patients who completed Hip Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical Function Short Form (HOOS-PS), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Short Form 10a (PF SF-10a), PROMIS Global Health (GH)-Mental, or PROMIS GH-Physical, and pain score questionnaires were identified. PROM scores were collected preoperatively and at 3-month and 1-year postoperative intervals. Comparisons using chi-square and ANOVA tests were applied.Results: The rates of achieving MCID and improvement within the first year were (69.2 vs. 76.9%) for PROMIS GH-Physical, (38.5 vs. 46.2%) for PROMIS GH-Mental, (71.4 vs. 92.9%) for HOOS-PS, (80.0 vs. 80.0%) for PROMIS PF SF-10a, and (74.0 vs. 91.7%) for pain scores. PROM scores at 3 months and 1 year significantly varied across all categories, except for PROMIS GH-Mental. No patients had iliopsoas tendinitis, dislocations, or re-operations.Discussion: ACH implants may alleviate anterior hip pain, while maintaining comparable strength and bio-compatibility to conventional femoral heads. This study underscores the early safety and potential of ACH implants in reducing iliopsoas tendinitis and impingement.
引用
收藏
页码:748 / 753
页数:6
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [2] Early PROMs Following Total Knee Arthroplasty-Functional Outcome Dependent on Patella Resurfacing
    Baker, Paul N.
    Petheram, Timothy
    Dowen, Daniel
    Jameson, Simon S.
    Avery, Peter J.
    Reed, Mike R.
    Deehan, David J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2014, 29 (02) : 314 - 319
  • [3] The Prevalence of Groin Pain After Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty and Total Hip Resurfacing
    Bartelt, Robert B.
    Yuan, Brandon J.
    Trousdale, Robert T.
    Sierra, Rafael J.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2010, 468 (09) : 2346 - 2356
  • [4] Outcomes of cup revision for ilio-psoas impingement after total hip arthroplasty: Retrospective study of 46 patients
    Batailler, C.
    Bonin, N.
    Wettstein, M.
    Nogier, A.
    Martres, S.
    Ollier, E.
    May, O.
    Lustig, S.
    [J]. ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2017, 103 (08) : 1147 - 1153
  • [5] Baumgarten Keith M, 2012, JBJS Case Connect, V2, pe22, DOI 10.2106/JBJS.CC.K.00079
  • [6] Evaluation of Endoscopic Iliopsoas Tenotomy for Treatment of Iliopsoas Impingement After Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Bell, Courtney D.
    Wagner, Mark B.
    Wang, Lian
    Gundle, Kenneth R.
    Heller, Lloyd E.
    Gehling, Hanne A.
    Duwelius, Paul J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2019, 34 (07) : 1498 - 1501
  • [7] Disappointing Short-Term Results With the DePuy ASR XL Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Bernthal, Nicholas M.
    Celestre, Paul C.
    Stavrakis, Alexandra I.
    Ludington, John C.
    Oakes, Daniel A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2012, 27 (04) : 539 - 544
  • [9] Browne JA., 2011, J ARTHROPLASTY, V26
  • [10] Canfield Michael, 2020, Arthroplast Today, V6, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.artd.2019.10.003