Identifying Alternative Options for Chatbots With Multi-Criteria Decision-Making A Comparative Study

被引:0
|
作者
Srivastava, Praveen Ranjan [1 ]
Singh, Harshit Kumar [1 ]
Sakshi, Surabhi [1 ]
Zhang, Justin Zuopeng [2 ]
Li, Qiuzheng [3 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Management Rohtak, Rohtak, India
[2] Univ North Florida, Coggin Coll Business, Dept Management, Jacksonville, FL USA
[3] Zhejiang Wanli Univ, Ningbo, Peoples R China
关键词
Chatbots; CRITIC; Decision-Making; EDAS; MCDM; WASPAS; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.4018/JDM.345917
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Artificial intelligence-powered chatbot usage continues to grow worldwide, and there is ongoing research to identify features that maximize the utility of chatbots. This study uses the multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method to find the best available alternative chatbot for task completion. We identify chatbot evaluation criteria from literature followed by inputs from experts using the Delphi method. We apply CRITIC to evaluate the relative importance of the specified criteria. Finally, we list popular alternatives of chatbots and features offered and apply WASPAS and EDAS techniques to rank the available alternatives. The alternatives explored in this study include YOU, ChatGPT, PerplexityAI, ChatSonic, and CharacterAI. Both methods yield identical results in ranking, with ChatGPT emerging as the most preferred alternative based on the criteria identified.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluating multi-criteria decision-making in health technology assessment
    Kelley, Leah T.
    Egan, Rylan
    Stockley, Denise
    Johnson, Ana P.
    HEALTH POLICY AND TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 7 (03) : 310 - 317
  • [32] Comparison of multi-criteria decision-making methods for equipment selection
    Hodgett, Richard Edgar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 85 (5-8): : 1145 - 1157
  • [33] THE MOMENT INTEGRATED SOLUTION METHOD IN MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING
    Akan, Ercan
    Bayar, Sibel
    Elmas, Guldem
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING-THEORY APPLICATIONS AND PRACTICE, 2020, 27 (06): : 844 - 866
  • [34] Multi-criteria decision-making methods: application in humanitarian operations
    Nain, Aniruddh
    Jain, Deepika
    Trivedi, Ashish
    BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2024, 31 (06) : 2090 - 2128
  • [35] Drone selection using multi-criteria decision-making methods
    Khan, Muhammad Sohaib
    Shah, Syed Irtiza Ali
    Javed, Ali
    Qadri, Nafees Mumtaz
    Hussain, Nadeem
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2021 INTERNATIONAL BHURBAN CONFERENCE ON APPLIED SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGIES (IBCAST), 2021, : 256 - 270
  • [36] A multi-criteria decision-making approach for schizophrenia treatment techniques
    Ozsahin, Ilker
    Abebe, Samuel Tadesse
    Mok, Greta S. P.
    ARCHIVES OF PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHOTHERAPY, 2020, 22 (02): : 52 - 61
  • [37] Extending the WEDBA to the fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making environment
    Al-Hawari, Tarek
    Naji, Ahmed
    Alshraideh, Hussam
    Bataineh, Omar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER APPLICATIONS IN TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 59 (04) : 330 - 346
  • [38] Application of Multi-criteria Decision-making Methods for the Area of Recycling
    Mikusova, Nikoleta
    Stopka, Ondrej
    Stopkova, Maria
    TEM JOURNAL-TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION MANAGEMENT INFORMATICS, 2019, 8 (03): : 827 - 835
  • [39] A MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING APPROACH FOR GREENOVATIVE SUPPLIER SELECTION
    Buyukselcuk, Elif Caloglu
    Tozan, Hakan
    Vayvay, Ozalp
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING-THEORY APPLICATIONS AND PRACTICE, 2022, 29 (02): : 283 - 301
  • [40] Picture fuzzy WASPAS technique and its application in multi-criteria decision-making
    Senapati, Tapan
    Chen, Guiyun
    SOFT COMPUTING, 2022, 26 (09) : 4413 - 4421