Evaluation of long-term benefits and cost-effectiveness of nation-wide colorectal cancer screening strategies in China in 2020-2060: a modelling analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Lu, Bin [1 ,2 ]
Luo, Jiahui [1 ,2 ]
Yan, Yike [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Yuhan [1 ,2 ]
Luo, Chenyu [1 ,2 ]
Li, Na [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Yueyang [2 ]
Wu, Dong [3 ]
Dai, Min [1 ]
Chen, Hongda [2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Natl Canc Ctr, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc, Dept Canc Epidemiol,Canc Hosp, Beijing 100021, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Inst Clin Med, Ctr Prevent & Early Intervent,Natl Infrastruct Tra, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Dept Gastroenterol, Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
来源
LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH-WESTERN PACIFIC | 2024年 / 51卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Colorectal cancer; Screening; Effectiveness; Cost-effectiveness; Microsimulation; TASK-FORCE; COLONOSCOPY; MORTALITY; STAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101172
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Evidence on the long-term benefits fi ts and cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening strategies in China remains limited. This modelling study aims to address this issue for various CRC screening strategies in China between 2020 and 2060. Methods Using a previously developed microsimulation model (MIMIC-CRC) with Chinese epidemiological data, we evaluated four CRC screening strategies targeting population aged 45-74 - 74 years: no screening, colonoscopy every 10 years, biennial faecal immunochemical testing (FIT), and a roll-out FIT screening strategy. Screening coverage (invitation) rates from 5% to 100% were analysed. Single-cohort analysis of 100,000 individuals was conducted to estimate the relative cost-effectiveness of each strategy. A multiple-cohort analysis of 100,000 people aged 40+ over 2020-2060 - 2060 was conducted to project nation-wide long-term benefits fi ts and cost-effectiveness. Findings In single-cohort analysis, all strategies yielded reductions in CRC incidence and mortality compared to no screening, with colonoscopy outperforming FIT-based strategies at the same invitation rates. In multiple-cohort analysis, among people over 40 years of age in China over 2020-2060, - 2060, compared to no screening, at invitation rate of 5%, screening by colonoscopy, biennial FIT and roll-out FIT-based approach were estimated to avert 1.2, 0.4, and 0.3 million incident CRCs and 0.2, 0.1, and 0.1 million CRC-related deaths, respectively, compared to no screening (25.4 million incident CRCs and 4.4 million CRC-related deaths), and this preventive effect enlarged as the screening coverage rate increased. At full coverage, colonoscopy achieved the largest reductions (38.2% lower incidence and 43.2% lower mortality) but required the most resources. Biennial FIT and roll-out FIT-based approach screening was slightly less effective but had significant fi cant reduced colonoscopy needs (reduction of 83.8% and 85.2%, respectively) and overall cost (reduction of 23.4% and 37.8%, respectively) compared to colonoscopy screening. Interpretation Nation-wide implementation of screening would be effective in reducing the burden of CRC in China. Biennial FIT and roll-out FIT-based screening strategies could prevent incident CRC cases and CRC-related deaths with considerably fewer resources than colonoscopy screening. Efforts should be made to increase the screening coverage in China. Copyright (c) 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening in Shanghai, China: A modelling study
    Wang, Jie
    de Jonge, Lucie
    Cenin, Dayna R.
    Li, Pei
    Tao, Sha
    Yang, Chen
    Yan, Bei
    Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE REPORTS, 2022, 29
  • [2] Long-term evaluation of benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program in Australia: a modelling study
    Lew, Jie-Bin
    St John, D. James B.
    Xu, Xiang-Ming
    Greuter, Marjolein J. E.
    Caruana, Michael
    Cenin, Dayna R.
    He, Emily
    Saville, Marion
    Grogan, Paul
    Coupe, Veerle M. H.
    Canfell, Karen
    LANCET PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 2 (07) : E331 - E340
  • [3] Accuracy and long-term effectiveness of established screening modalities and strategies in colorectal cancer screening: An umbrella review
    Zhang, Yuelun
    Song, Kai
    Zhou, Yueyang
    Chen, Yuqing
    Cheng, Xinran
    Dai, Min
    Wu, Dong
    Chen, Hongda
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2025,
  • [4] Long-term cost-effectiveness of screening strategies for hearing loss
    Liu, Chuan-Fen
    Collins, Margaret P.
    Souza, Pamela E.
    Yueh, Bevan
    JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 48 (03) : 235 - 243
  • [5] Estimated cost-effectiveness of sequential screening for colorectal cancer: evidence from the largest province- wide colorectal cancer screening program in China
    Zhu, Juan
    Jiang, Bingjie
    Xia, Ruyi
    Zhu, Chen
    Wu, Weimiao
    Du, Lingbin
    LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH-WESTERN PACIFIC, 2025, 55
  • [6] Evaluation of the benefits, harms and cost-effectiveness of potential alternatives to iFOBT testing for colorectal cancer screening in Australia
    Lew, Jie-Bin
    St John, D. James B.
    Macrae, Finlay A.
    Emery, Jon D.
    Ee, Hooi C.
    Jenkins, Mark A.
    He, Emily
    Grogan, Paul
    Caruana, Michael
    Sarfati, Diana
    Greuter, Marjolein J. E.
    Coupe, Veerle M. H.
    Canfell, Karen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2018, 143 (02) : 269 - 282
  • [7] Cost-effectiveness analysis of two strategies for mass screening for colorectal cancer in France
    Berchi, C
    Bouvier, V
    Réaud, JM
    Launoy, G
    HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2004, 13 (03) : 227 - 238
  • [8] Cost-effectiveness analysis of alternative colorectal cancer screening strategies in high-risk individuals
    Benamouzig, Robert
    Barre, Stephanie
    Saurin, Jean-Christophe
    Leleu, Henri
    Vimont, Alexandre
    Taleb, Sabrine
    De Bels, Frederic
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 14
  • [9] Cost-effectiveness analysis of a community-based colorectal cancer screening program in Shanghai, China
    Jiang, Hongli
    Zhang, Peng
    Gu, Kai
    Gong, Yangming
    Peng, Peng
    Shi, Yan
    Ai, Dashan
    Chen, Wen
    Fu, Chen
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10
  • [10] Tuberculosis screening for long-term care: a cost-effectiveness analysis
    Verma, G.
    Chuck, A. W.
    Jacobs, P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TUBERCULOSIS AND LUNG DISEASE, 2013, 17 (09) : 1170 - 1177