The relationship between receptive and productive knowledge of L2 English collocations

被引:1
作者
Lee, Senyung [1 ]
机构
[1] Chonnam Natl Univ, Dept English, Sch Int Studies, Daehak Ro 50, Yeosu 59626, Jeollanam, South Korea
关键词
lexical development; second language acquisition; VOCABULARY KNOWLEDGE; R PACKAGE; 2ND-LANGUAGE; PHRASEOLOGY; LANGUAGE; WORDS; LIST;
D O I
10.1111/ijal.12605
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study investigated the gap between receptive and productive knowledge of second language (L2) collocations across different L2 proficiency levels and whether the two types of knowledge constitute distinct constructs or not. Four groups of adult learners of English (n = 205) and two groups of native speakers of English (n = 85) completed four written tasks: a sentence writing task, fill-in-the-blank task, multiple-choice task, and Yes/No acceptability judgment task. Each task addressed 64 academic English collocations, including verb-noun, adverb-adjective, adjective-noun, and adverb-verb collocations. Results showed that the gap between receptive and productive knowledge gradually decreased as learners' L2 proficiency increased. Implicational scaling analysis showed an acquisition order of four different types of collocation knowledge and suggested that recall mastery of collocations should not be considered equivalent to productive mastery of collocations. Results from confirmatory factor analysis showed that receptive and productive knowledge of L2 collocations are two distinct constructs.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 133
页数:25
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Developing the Academic Collocation List (ACL) - A corpus-driven and expert-judged approach [J].
Ackermann, Kirsten ;
Chen, Yu-Hua .
JOURNAL OF ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES, 2013, 12 (04) :235-247
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
[3]  
Bachman L. F., 1990, FUNDAMENTAL CONSIDER
[4]  
Bardovi-Harlig K., 2011, Pragmatics: Teaching natural conversation, P7
[5]  
Bonk W.J., 2001, FOCUS LANGUAGE TEST, P113
[6]   The Vocabulary Knowledge Scale: A Critical Analysis [J].
Bruton, Anthony .
LANGUAGE ASSESSMENT QUARTERLY, 2009, 6 (04) :288-297
[7]  
Carr N.T., 2011, DESIGNING ANAL LANGU
[8]  
Coxhead A., 2008, PHRASEOLOGY FOREIGN, P149
[9]   Corpus-based versus traditional learning of collocations [J].
Daskalovska, Nina .
COMPUTER ASSISTED LANGUAGE LEARNING, 2015, 28 (02) :130-144
[10]  
Davies M., 2008, The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA), DOI DOI 10.1017/9781108770750.002