Generative-AI, a Learning Assistant? Factors Influencing Higher-Ed Students' Technology Acceptance

被引:1
作者
Kanont, Kraisila [1 ]
Pingmuang, Pawarit [1 ]
Simasathien, Thewawuth [1 ]
Wisnuwong, Suchaya [1 ]
Wiwatsiripong, Benz [1 ]
Poonpirome, Kanitta [1 ]
Songkram, Noawanit [3 ]
Khlaisang, Jintavee [2 ]
机构
[1] Chulalongkorn Univ, Fac Educ, Dept Educ Technol & Commun, Bangkok, Thailand
[2] Chulalongkorn Univ, Fac Educ, Ctr Excellence Educ Invent & Innovat, Dept Educ Technol & Commun, Bangkok, Thailand
[3] Chulalongkorn Univ, Learning Innovat Thai Soc Res Unit LIFTS, Bangkok, Thailand
来源
ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF E-LEARNING | 2024年 / 22卷 / 06期
关键词
Artificial Intelligence in education; Educational technology; Generative-AI; Student perceptions; Technology Acceptance Model; SEM research; INTRINSIC MOTIVATION; PERCEIVED EASE; MODEL;
D O I
10.34190/ejel.22.6.3196
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study investigates the factors influencing the adoption of Generative-AI tools amongst Thai university students, employing the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) as a theoretical framework. Data from 911 higher education students from 10 different Thai Universities Health Sciences, Sciences and Technology, Social Sciences and Humanities, and Vocational Fields were analysed via Structural Equation Modelling (SEM). The instrument used in collecting the data was a questionnaire. Results indicated that Expected Benefits, Perceived Usefulness, Attitude Toward Technology, and Behavioural Intention all significantly impacted student adoption of Generative AI. Intriguingly, Perceived Ease of Use was negatively correlated with Perceived Usefulness, challenging conventional TAM assumptions. This study underscores the need to address language barriers, foster a culture of innovation, and establish ethical guidelines to promote responsible AI use within education. Despite inherent limitations, this research contributes to our understanding of AI adoption in educational settings and helps inform strategies for equitable access and responsible innovation. The result demonstrated that the easier a tool was to use, the less value leaners seemed to see in it for their learning process. It can be implied that as Generative- AI get more intuitive, learners think they're less helpful. These finding challenges a few of those assumptions we usually make within the TAM model. It also points out the characteristic of learners which affects their learning preferences and expectation. Another finding showed the impact of language barrier on non-native English speaker that obstruct the user experience in AI services. Moreover, the role of universities in fostering both AI integration for learning for and the ethical implementation of Generative AI. By providing a supportive environment that encourages AI experimentation, redesign learning, empowering learners and faculty instructors to investigate how Generative AI can be applied across disciplines, and developing guidelines for ethical use, universities play a critical role in shaping the effective and responsible integration of AI into the next educational landscape.
引用
收藏
页码:18 / 33
页数:16
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]   Artificial Intelligence and Its Role in Education [J].
Ahmad, Sayed Fayaz ;
Rahmat, Mohd Khairil ;
Mubarik, Muhammad Shujaat ;
Alam, Muhammad Mansoor ;
Hyder, Syed Irfan .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (22)
[2]  
Al Darayseh A., 2023, COMPUTERS ED ARTIFIC, V4, P100132, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.CAEAI.2023.100132
[3]   Extending the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to Predict University Students' Intentions to Use Metaverse-Based Learning Platforms [J].
Al-Adwan, Ahmad Samed ;
Li, Na ;
Al-Adwan, Amer ;
Abbasi, Ghazanfar Ali ;
Albelbis, Nour Awni ;
Habibi, Akhmad .
EDUCATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2023, 28 (11) :15381-15413
[4]   Technology Acceptance Model in M-learning context: A systematic review [J].
Al-Emran, Mostafa ;
Mezhuyev, Vitaliy ;
Kamaludin, Adzhar .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2018, 125 :389-412
[5]  
Ahmed YA, 2021, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:2108.11455
[6]  
Buddemeyer A., 2021, arXiv, DOI [10.48550/arXiv.2111.08581, DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.2111.08581]
[7]  
Bulathwela S., 2021, arXiv
[8]   Understanding managers' attitudes and behavioral intentions towards using artificial intelligence for organizational decision-making [J].
Cao, Guangming ;
Duan, Yanqing ;
Edwards, John S. ;
Dwivedi, Yogesh K. .
TECHNOVATION, 2021, 106
[9]   The Promises and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence for Teachers: a Systematic Review of Research [J].
Celik, Ismail ;
Dindar, Muhterem ;
Muukkonen, Hanni ;
Jarvela, Sanna .
TECHTRENDS, 2022, 66 (04) :616-630
[10]  
Chan CKY, 2023, Arxiv, DOI [arXiv:2305.00290, 10.48550/arXiv.2305.00290, DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.2305.00290]