Comparison of the impact of team-based learning and lecture-based learning on nursing students' core competencies: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:7
作者
Gao, Xin [1 ]
Yan, Di [2 ]
Zhang, Ya [3 ]
Ruan, Xiang [3 ]
Kang, Tingyu [3 ]
Wang, Ruotong [4 ]
Zheng, Qi [1 ]
Chen, Siju [1 ]
Zhai, Jinxia [1 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Med Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Occupat & Environm Hlth, Meishan Rd 81, AH-230032 Hefei, Peoples R China
[2] Anhui Med Univ, Sch Hlth Management, Dept Publ Affairs Adm, Meishan Rd 81, AH-230032 Hefei, Peoples R China
[3] Anhui Med Univ, Sch Clin Med 1, Meishan Rd 81, AH-230032 Hefei, Peoples R China
[4] Anhui Med Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Meishan Rd 81, AH-230032 Hefei, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Core competence; Theoretical knowledge; Practical skills; Professional effects; Meta-analysis; Nursing education research; Pedagogy; Team-based learning; Lecture-based learning; Systematic review; EDUCATION; PERFORMANCE; PERCEPTION; KNOWLEDGE; PATIENT; BIAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.nepr.2024.103945
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aim: This study aims to evaluate the effect of team-based learning on the core competence of nursing students compared with traditional teaching methods. Background: In recent years, team-based learning has been widely used as a learning and teaching method in the world. Not only the necessary knowledge, skills and attitudes, but also the core competence is necessary to cope with various clinical situations for nursing students. However, the effect of this new teaching method on core competence of nursing students is not consistent. Design: The study was designed according to the preferred reporting entries guidelines statement for systematic reviews and meta-analyses and population, intervention, comparison, outcome and study. Methods: Data were collected from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, ScienceDirect and Scopus. The quality of studies was assessed using "The Newcastle Ottawa scale". A random-effect model of meta-analyses was conducted to generate pooled standardized mean differences (SMD) for core competence using Rev Man 5.4.1 software and STATASE 15. Moreover, subgroup, heterogeneity, sensitivity and publication bias analyses were conducted. Results: A total of 14 articles with 1942 participants were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with the traditional pedagogy among nursing students, team-based learning pedagogy significantly increased theoretical performance, professional effects (self-directed learning ability and communication ability) but did not affect practice skills. In addition, one study found that learning attitudes were not improved in students with high or low academic performance. This might mean that the teaching model should be implemented for a long time, which essentially changed students' learning attitudes to improve students' self-directed learning ability and core competence, especially for students with low scores. Conclusions: In summary, findings indicated that team-based learning pedagogical approaches might be beneficial to improve teaching quality in nursing education. However, practice skills might not be sensitive to teambased learning because of the seriation of the original course. Nursing educators need to explore teaching strategies to cultivate high-quality nursing talents to cultivate nursing students with core competence and ensure that they are successfully qualified for new employment.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A meta-analysis of students' readiness assurance test performance with team-based learning
    Phan Nguyen Ngoc
    Cheng, Chao-Ling
    Lin, Yen-Kuang
    Wu, Ming-Shun
    Chu, Jan-Show
    Tang, Kung-Pei
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [22] Problem-based learning in comparison with lecture-based learning among medical students
    Faisal, Rizwan
    Khalil-ur-Rehman
    Bahadur, Sher
    Shinwari, Laiyla
    JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 66 (06) : 650 - 653
  • [23] The comparison of knowledge score between lecture-based learning and the combination of problem-based (learning) and lecture-based learning among internal medicine students A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Fajar, J. K.
    Soenarti, S.
    ARCHIVES OF HELLENIC MEDICINE, 2024, 41 (01): : 99 - 104
  • [24] Comparison of team-based learning vs. lecture-based teaching with small group discussion in a master's degree in nursing education course
    Xue, Hui
    Yuan, Hua
    Li, Guichen
    Liu, Jiamei
    Zhang, Xiuying
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2021, 105
  • [25] Team-based learning versus traditional teaching effect on pharmacy Students' Performance: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis
    Korayem, Ghazwa B.
    Alghamdi, Albandari A.
    Aljuhani, Ohoud
    Ivy, Delaney
    Alhubaishi, Alaa A.
    Alkofide, Hadeel
    SAUDI PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 32 (04)
  • [26] Evaluating team-based, lecture-based, and hybrid learning methods for neurology clerkship in China: a method-comparison study
    Lian-Hong Yang
    Long-Yuan Jiang
    Bing Xu
    Shu-Qiong Liu
    Yan-Ran Liang
    Jin-Hao Ye
    En-Xiang Tao
    BMC Medical Education, 14
  • [27] Choice-based learning: lecture-based or team learning?
    Opdecam, Evelien
    Everaert, Patricia
    ACCOUNTING EDUCATION, 2019, 28 (03) : 239 - 273
  • [28] The effect of team-based learning on content knowledge: A meta-analysis
    Swanson, Elizabeth
    McCulley, Lisa V.
    Osman, David J.
    Lewis, Nancy Scammacca
    Solis, Michael
    ACTIVE LEARNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2019, 20 (01) : 39 - 50
  • [29] Comparison of Lecture-Based Learning vs Discussion-Based Learning in Undergraduate Medical Students
    Zhao, Beiqun
    Potter, Donald D.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2016, 73 (02) : 250 - 257
  • [30] Effects of simulation technology-based learning on nursing students' learning outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies
    Mulyadi, Mulyadi
    Tonapa, Santo Imanuel
    Rompas, Sefti Selfijani Jehermia
    Wang, Ruey-Hsia
    Lee, Bih-O
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2021, 107