Support for the Time-Varying Drift Rate Model of Perceptual Discrimination in Dynamic and Static Noise Using Bayesian Model-Fitting Methodology

被引:0
作者
Deakin, Jordan [1 ,2 ]
Schofield, Andrew [3 ]
Heinke, Dietmar [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Sch Psychol, Birmingham B15 2TT, England
[2] Univ Hamburg, Fac Psychol & Human Movement Sci, Gen Psychol, Von Melle Pk, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany
[3] Aston Univ, Sch Psychol, Birmingham B4 7ET, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
selective influence; Bayesian cognitive modelling; perceptual decision making; perceptual integration; DIFFUSION DECISION-MODEL; PROBABILITY; ACCURACY; SPEED; INTEGRATION; PARAMETERS; ATTENTION; STRENGTH; SEARCH; MEMORY;
D O I
10.3390/e26080642
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
The drift-diffusion model (DDM) is a common approach to understanding human decision making. It considers decision making as accumulation of evidence about visual stimuli until sufficient evidence is reached to make a decision (decision boundary). Recently, Smith and colleagues proposed an extension of DDM, the time-varying DDM (TV-DDM). Here, the standard simplification that evidence accumulation operates on a fully formed representation of perceptual information is replaced with a perceptual integration stage modulating evidence accumulation. They suggested that this model particularly captures decision making regarding stimuli with dynamic noise. We tested this new model in two studies by using Bayesian parameter estimation and model comparison with marginal likelihoods. The first study replicated Smith and colleagues' findings by utilizing the classical random-dot kinomatogram (RDK) task, which requires judging the motion direction of randomly moving dots (motion discrimination task). In the second study, we used a novel type of stimulus designed to be like RDKs but with randomized hue of stationary dots (color discrimination task). This study also found TV-DDM to be superior, suggesting that perceptual integration is also relevant for static noise possibly where integration over space is required. We also found support for within-trial changes in decision boundaries ("collapsing boundaries"). Interestingly, and in contrast to most studies, the boundaries increased with increasing task difficulty (amount of noise). Future studies will need to test this finding in a formal model.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]   Excitatory versus inhibitory feedback in Bayesian formulations of scene construction [J].
Abadi, Alireza Khatoon ;
Yahya, Keyvan ;
Amini, Massoud ;
Friston, Karl ;
Heinke, Dietmar .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY INTERFACE, 2019, 16 (154)
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2021, MATLAB version 9.11.0 (Version R2021b)
[3]   Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioral experiment builder [J].
Anwyl-Irvine, Alexander L. ;
Massonnie, Jessica ;
Flitton, Adam ;
Kirkham, Natasha ;
Evershed, Jo K. .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2020, 52 (01) :388-407
[4]   Empirical validation of the diffusion model for recognition memory and a comparison of parameter-estimation methods [J].
Arnold, Nina R. ;
Broeder, Arndt ;
Bayen, Ute J. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2015, 79 (05) :882-898
[5]   TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL SUMMATION IN HUMAN VISION AT DIFFERENT BACKGROUND INTENSITIES [J].
BARLOW, HB .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1958, 141 (02) :337-350
[6]   A theoretical analysis of the reward rate optimality of collapsing decision criteria [J].
Boehm, Udo ;
van Maanen, Leendert ;
Evans, Nathan J. ;
Brown, Scott D. ;
Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan .
ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2020, 82 (03) :1520-1534
[7]   Trial-by-trial fluctuations in CNV amplitude reflect anticipatory adjustment of response caution [J].
Boehm, Udo ;
van Maanen, Leendert ;
Forstmann, Birte ;
van Rijn, Hedderik .
NEUROIMAGE, 2014, 96 :95-105
[8]   The physics of optimal decision making: A formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced-choice tasks [J].
Bogacz, Rafal ;
Brown, Eric ;
Moehlis, Jeff ;
Holmes, Philip ;
Cohen, Jonathan D. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2006, 113 (04) :700-765
[9]   The urgency-gating model can explain the effects of early evidence [J].
Carland, Matthew A. ;
Thura, David ;
Cisek, Paul .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2015, 22 (06) :1830-1838
[10]   Time pressure affects the efficiency of perceptual processing in decisions under conflict [J].
Dambacher, Michael ;
Huebner, Ronald .
PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2015, 79 (01) :83-94