Zirconia full-arch implant prostheses: Survival, complications, and prosthetic space dimensions with 115 edentulous jaws

被引:0
|
作者
Papaspyridakos, Panos [1 ,2 ]
Sinada, Naif
Ntovas, Panagiotis [2 ]
Barmak, Abdul Basir [1 ]
Chochlidakis, Konstantinos [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Eastman Inst Oral Hlth, Dept Prosthodont, Rochester, NY USA
[2] Tufts Univ, Sch Dent Med, Dept Prosthodont, One Kneeland St, Boston, MA 02111 USA
关键词
dental implants; digital workflow; full-arch implant rehabilitation; full-arch zirconia prosthesis; full-arch zirconia; prosthetic space; survival and complications; FIXED DENTAL PROSTHESES; FRACTURE-RESISTANCE;
D O I
10.1111/jopr.13922
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
PurposeTo assess the survival and complication rates of 115 monolithic zirconia implant-supported fixed complete dental prostheses (IFCDPs) with an up to 6-year follow-up.Materials and MethodsOne hundred fifteen edentulous jaws (71 patients) underwent complete-arch implant treatment with a digital workflow and were rehabilitated with monolithic zirconia IFCDPs. The primary outcome was to assess survival and complication rates while the secondary outcome was to measure the cross-sectional dimensions (prosthetic space) of those 115 monolithic zirconia IFCDPs and to correlate potential technical complications with the prosthetic space dimensions.ResultsOut of the 115 zirconia IFCDPs, 2 fractured, yielding a 98.6% survival rate up to a 6-year follow-up. The most commom minor technical complications were loss of screw access channel filling and porcelain chipping for the modified monolithic IFCDPs. There was no significant association between the count and type of complications and jaw location (maxilla vs. mandible) or prosthesis type (FP1 vs. FP3), according to Fisher's exact test. For maxillary zirconia IFCDPs, the mean square surface for the at the posterior abutment cross-sectional area was 25.18 mm2 at the lingual side of the abutment and 34.19 mm2 at the buccal side, respectively. The anterior abutment cross-sectional area was 33.92 mm2 at the lingual side of the abutment and 29.49 mm2 at the buccal side, respectively. For mandibular zirconia IFCDPs, the mean square surface at the posterior abutment cross-sectional area was 29.89 mm2 at the lingual side of the abutment and 39.05 mm2 at the buccal side, respectively. The anterior abutment cross-sectional area was 27.07 mm2 at the lingual side of the abutment and 56.50 mm2 at the buccal side, respectively. At the connector cross-sectional area, the mean square surface for the maxillary zirconia IFCDPs was 64.33 and 90.56 mm2 for the mandibular zirconia IFCDPs. The two fractures occurred in the midline (anterior area) for both maxillary FP1 prosthesis and mandibular FP3 prosthesis. The mean surface area at the connector for the maxillary FP1 prosthesis was 28.50 and 82.11 mm2 for the mandibular FP3 prosthesis, and was within the range of IFCDP connector square surface area. There was no significant association between the thickness of the zirconia prosthesis and the encountered prosthesis fractures.ConclusionsMonolithic zirconia IFCDPs yielded a 98.6% survival rate, after a mean observation period of 62 months with an SE of 3.1. The connector mean surface area in the two fractured IFCDPs was within the square surface range (minimum-maximum) as for the remaining 113 complication-free IFCDPs.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 280
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Fracture Strength of Standard and Small Diameter Prosthetic Abutments for Full-Arch Implant-Supported Restorations
    Martins de Sa, Bruno Costa
    Andrighetto, Augusto Ricardo
    Bernardes, Sergio Rocha
    Tiossi, Rodrigo
    JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2017, 43 (03) : 175 - 179
  • [42] Efficacy of rehabilitation with different approaches of implant-supported full-arch prosthetic designs: A systematic review
    Ramanauskaite, Ausra
    Becker, Kathrin
    Wolfart, Stefan
    Lukman, Fanya
    Schwarz, Frank
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2022, 49 : 272 - 290
  • [43] Biomechanical behavior of titanium and zirconia frameworks for implant-supported full-arch fixed dental prosthesis
    Tiossi, Rodrigo
    Gomes, Erica Alves
    Lapria Faria, Adriana Claudia
    Silveira Rodrigues, Renata Cristina
    Ribeiro, Ricardo Faria
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2017, 19 (05) : 860 - 866
  • [44] Clinical evaluation of full-arch screw-retained implant-supported fixed prostheses and full-arch telescopic-retained implant-supported fixed prostheses: A 5-12 year follow-up retrospective study
    Mori, Gentaro
    Oda, Yukari
    Sakamoto, Kei
    Ito, Taichi
    Yajima, Yasutomo
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2019, 30 (03) : 197 - 205
  • [45] Clinical outcomes of full arch fixed implant-supported zirconia prostheses: A systematic review
    Bidra, Avinash
    Rungruanganunt, Patchanee
    Gauthier, Marissa
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2017, 10 : 35 - 45
  • [46] Immediate implant placement in fresh sockets versus implant placement in healed bone for full-arch fixed prostheses with conventional loading
    Altintas, N. Y.
    Taskesen, F.
    Bagis, B.
    Baltacioglu, E.
    Cezairli, B.
    Senel, F. C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2016, 45 (02) : 226 - 231
  • [47] Peri-implant Tissue Health and Bone Resorption in Patients with Immediately Loaded, Implant-Supported, Full-Arch Prostheses
    Menini, Maria
    Setti, Paolo
    Pera, Paolo
    Pera, Francesco
    Pesce, Paolo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2018, 31 (04) : 327 - 333
  • [48] Full-arch implant-supported rehabilitations: A prospective study comparing porcelain-veneered zirconia frameworks to monolithic zirconia
    Carames, Joao
    Marques, Duarte
    Barbosa, Joao Malta
    Moreira, Andre
    Crispim, Pedro
    Chen, Andre
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2019, 30 (01) : 68 - 78
  • [49] A Comparison Between Fixed and Removable Mandibular Implant-Supported Full-Arch Prostheses: An Overview of Systematic Reviews
    Tsigarida, Alexandra
    Chochlidakis, Konstantinos
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2021, 34 : S85 - S92
  • [50] Tooth Fractures in Fixed Full-Arch Implant-Supported Acrylic Resin Prostheses: A Retrospective Clinical Study
    Ventura, Javier
    Jimenez-Castellanos, Emilio
    Romero, Jose
    Enrile, Francisco
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2016, 29 (02) : 161 - 165