Zirconia full-arch implant prostheses: Survival, complications, and prosthetic space dimensions with 115 edentulous jaws

被引:0
|
作者
Papaspyridakos, Panos [1 ,2 ]
Sinada, Naif
Ntovas, Panagiotis [2 ]
Barmak, Abdul Basir [1 ]
Chochlidakis, Konstantinos [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Eastman Inst Oral Hlth, Dept Prosthodont, Rochester, NY USA
[2] Tufts Univ, Sch Dent Med, Dept Prosthodont, One Kneeland St, Boston, MA 02111 USA
关键词
dental implants; digital workflow; full-arch implant rehabilitation; full-arch zirconia prosthesis; full-arch zirconia; prosthetic space; survival and complications; FIXED DENTAL PROSTHESES; FRACTURE-RESISTANCE;
D O I
10.1111/jopr.13922
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
PurposeTo assess the survival and complication rates of 115 monolithic zirconia implant-supported fixed complete dental prostheses (IFCDPs) with an up to 6-year follow-up.Materials and MethodsOne hundred fifteen edentulous jaws (71 patients) underwent complete-arch implant treatment with a digital workflow and were rehabilitated with monolithic zirconia IFCDPs. The primary outcome was to assess survival and complication rates while the secondary outcome was to measure the cross-sectional dimensions (prosthetic space) of those 115 monolithic zirconia IFCDPs and to correlate potential technical complications with the prosthetic space dimensions.ResultsOut of the 115 zirconia IFCDPs, 2 fractured, yielding a 98.6% survival rate up to a 6-year follow-up. The most commom minor technical complications were loss of screw access channel filling and porcelain chipping for the modified monolithic IFCDPs. There was no significant association between the count and type of complications and jaw location (maxilla vs. mandible) or prosthesis type (FP1 vs. FP3), according to Fisher's exact test. For maxillary zirconia IFCDPs, the mean square surface for the at the posterior abutment cross-sectional area was 25.18 mm2 at the lingual side of the abutment and 34.19 mm2 at the buccal side, respectively. The anterior abutment cross-sectional area was 33.92 mm2 at the lingual side of the abutment and 29.49 mm2 at the buccal side, respectively. For mandibular zirconia IFCDPs, the mean square surface at the posterior abutment cross-sectional area was 29.89 mm2 at the lingual side of the abutment and 39.05 mm2 at the buccal side, respectively. The anterior abutment cross-sectional area was 27.07 mm2 at the lingual side of the abutment and 56.50 mm2 at the buccal side, respectively. At the connector cross-sectional area, the mean square surface for the maxillary zirconia IFCDPs was 64.33 and 90.56 mm2 for the mandibular zirconia IFCDPs. The two fractures occurred in the midline (anterior area) for both maxillary FP1 prosthesis and mandibular FP3 prosthesis. The mean surface area at the connector for the maxillary FP1 prosthesis was 28.50 and 82.11 mm2 for the mandibular FP3 prosthesis, and was within the range of IFCDP connector square surface area. There was no significant association between the thickness of the zirconia prosthesis and the encountered prosthesis fractures.ConclusionsMonolithic zirconia IFCDPs yielded a 98.6% survival rate, after a mean observation period of 62 months with an SE of 3.1. The connector mean surface area in the two fractured IFCDPs was within the square surface range (minimum-maximum) as for the remaining 113 complication-free IFCDPs.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 280
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Digital Workflow for Implant Rehabilitation with Double Full-Arch Monolithic Zirconia Prostheses
    Papaspyridakos, Panos
    Chochlidakis, Konstantinos
    Kang, Kiho
    Chen, Yo-wei
    Alghfeli, Abdulla
    Kudara, Yukio
    Weber, Hans-Peter
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2020, 29 (06): : 460 - 465
  • [2] Digital vs Conventional Full-Arch Implant Impressions: A Retrospective Analysis of 36 Edentulous Jaws
    Papaspyridakos, Panos
    De Souza, Andre
    Finkelman, Matthew
    Sicilia, Elena
    Gotsis, Sotirios
    Chen, Yo-wei
    Vazouras, Konstantinos
    Chochlidakis, Konstantinos
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2023, 32 (04): : 325 - 330
  • [3] Full-arch implant-prosthetic rehabilitation
    Dell'Innocenti, Fabrizio
    Ceccanti, Gianluca
    Lazzerini, Giulio
    Pardossi, Gianluca
    DENTAL CADMOS, 2018, 86 (03) : 214 - 226
  • [4] Retrospective Cohort Evaluation of Full-Arch Zirconia Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses
    Al-Tarawneh, Sandra
    Thalji, Ghadeer
    Shonberg, David
    Fayz, Lily
    Cooper, Lyndon
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2023, 38 (02) : 381 - +
  • [5] Rehabilitation of Edentulous Jaws with Full-Arch Fixed Implant-Supported Prostheses: An Approach with Short and Ultrashort Implants and Metal-Free Materials
    Aiuto, Riccardo
    Barbieri, Christian
    Garcovich, Daniele
    Dioguardi, Mario
    Redaelli, Mattia
    De Micheli, Luca
    CASE REPORTS IN DENTISTRY, 2020, 2020
  • [6] Implant Survival in Immediately Loaded Full-Arch Rehabilitations Following an Anatomical Classification System-A Retrospective Study in 1200 Edentulous Jaws
    Carames, Joao Manuel Mendez
    Marques, Duarte Nuno da Silva
    Carames, Goncalo Bartolo
    Francisco, Helena Cristina Oliveira
    Vieira, Filipe Araujo
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (21)
  • [7] Complications of Fixed Full-Arch Implant-Supported Metal-Ceramic Prostheses
    Gonzalez-Gonzalez, Ignacio
    deLlanos-Lanchares, Hector
    Brizuela-Velasco, Aritza
    Alvarez-Riesgo, Jose-Antonio
    Llorente-Pendas, Santiago
    Herrero-Climent, Mariano
    Alvarez-Arenal, Angel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (12) : 1 - 23
  • [8] Full-arch prostheses from translucent zirconia: Accuracy of fit
    Sachs, Caroline
    Groesser, Julian
    Stadelmann, Markus
    Schweiger, Josef
    Erdelt, Kurt
    Beuer, Florian
    DENTAL MATERIALS, 2014, 30 (08) : 817 - 823
  • [9] Full-arch implant-supported monolithic zirconia fixed dental prostheses: An updated systematic review
    AlTarawneh, Sandra
    Thalji, Ghadeer
    Cooper, Lyndon
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2021, 14 (01) : 13 - 22
  • [10] Effect of different implant configurations on biomechanical behavior of full-arch implant-supported mandibular monolithic zirconia fixed prostheses
    Zhong, Jingxiao
    Guazzato, Massimiliano
    Chen, Junning
    Zhang, Zhongpu
    Sun, Guangyong
    Huo, Xintao
    Liu, Xinglong
    Ahmad, Rohana
    Li, Qing
    JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS, 2020, 102